<documentid="0E19DD269F6DC5BE152333F541A67FC6"ID-CLB-Dataset="27241"ID-DOI="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.677.12435"ID-GBIF-Dataset="e06ab083-5e00-4cee-bc7f-9543c2b3ceef"ID-PMC="PMC5534525"ID-Pensoft-Pub="1313-2970-677-97"ID-PubMed="28769690"ID-ZooBank="47DDCEE5B65C495D83DE0D2016A0F5D2"ModsDocAuthor=""ModsDocDate="2017"ModsDocID="1313-2970-677-97"ModsDocOrigin="ZooKeys 677"ModsDocTitle="Revision of the genus Reinmara Schaus, 1928 (Lepidoptera, Mimallonoidea, Mimallonidae) with the descriptions of four new species from South America"checkinTime="1555320242200"checkinUser="pensoft"docAuthor="Laurent, Ryan A. St, Herbin, Daniel & Mielke, Carlos G. C."docDate="2017"docId="9347DC934B5D77CA4F0E441CC8CA6505"docLanguage="en"docName="ZooKeys 677: 97-129"docOrigin="ZooKeys 677"docSource="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.677.12435"docTitle="Reinmara andensis Laurent, Herbin & Mielke, 2017, sp. n."docType="treatment"docUuid="0AFC5C82-6BB5-47FB-B86F-76B76B06259C"docUuidSource="ZooBank"docVersion="8"lastPageNumber="106"masterDocId="2D06FF97FFCDFF96FFADFFB7085AFFBC"masterDocTitle="Revision of the genus Reinmara Schaus, 1928 (Lepidoptera, Mimallonoidea, Mimallonidae) with the descriptions of four new species from South America"masterLastPageNumber="129"masterPageNumber="97"pageNumber="105"updateTime="1720467452061"updateUser="admin">
<mods:titleid="12A56913FE33ADA7CDE821573E982057">Revision of the genus Reinmara Schaus, 1928 (Lepidoptera, Mimallonoidea, Mimallonidae) with the descriptions of four new species from South America</mods:title>
Holotype, ♂. BOLIVIA: BOLIVIE, N. Yungas, 1000-1800 m, Oct,nov,Dec,2008, Leg. local collector for R. Marx, Coll. D. Herbin/ genitalia prep. D. Herbin ref H. 1134/ HOLOTYPE male
St Laurent, Herbin, & C. Mielke, 2017 [handwritten red label]/ (MNHN). Type locality: Bolivia, northern Yungas [no specific locality provided on data label].
<subSubSectionid="329D2F902293B5B711D51AEC25E36784"pageId="8"pageNumber="105"type="specimens of uncertain identity hereby excluded from the type series">
<paragraphid="4C016E1772C4B0EE1B76C8174A3453F5"pageId="8"pageNumber="105">Specimens of uncertain identity hereby excluded from the type series</paragraph>
but larger, with broader wings and broader submarginal areas, which are more uniformly light brown. Medially the light gray scaling is reduced in comparison with
, but are overall somewhat larger, the gnathos extensions are shorter and phallus more tubular with a more protruding ventral distal lip in comparison with
Male.Head: As for genus, but light brown in color. Thorax: Coloration as for head. Legs: Coloration as for thorax, vestiture thick, long. Forewing dorsum: Forewing length: 18.5-20.0 mm, avg.: 19.2 mm, wingspan: 37-40 mm, n=5. Triangular, margin slightly concave below apex; tornus notched, apex hardly falcate. Ground color light orange-brown, very sparsely scattered with tiny, dark brown, petiolate scales. Ante- and medial areas appearing lighter brown than more uniformly orange-brown submarginal area due to suffusion of lighter gray scales medially, especially near costa and on inner side of postmedial line, in some specimens medial area may be very dark brown with less suffusion of grayish pink. Antemedial line almost nonexistent. Discal mark pale gray, ovoid, variously darkened at center. Fringe coloration lighter than wing margin with nearly white trailing edge. Forewing ventrum: Similar to dorsum but more homogenously brown overall due to reduction in paler gray shading. Antemedial line absent, postmedial line reduced to traces. Hindwing dorsum: Notch on anterior margin weak, patterning as for forewing dorsum, but antemedial line absent, discal mark and postmedial line weakly defined. Hindwing ventrum: Following same pattern as forewing ventrum but traces of postmedial line outwardly bent mesally. Abdomen: Coloration as for thorax. Genitalia: (Fig. 25) n=4. Typical of genus, very similar to that of
but overall larger structures, with shorter but more robust gnathos extensions and a more tubular phallus with more prominent ventral distal lip. Female. Unknown [putative female from Wildsumaco, Napo, Ecuador does not differ from female
Additional material from MWM and MGCL from other localities in Peru besides those from the Puno region need verification due to the unreliability of the collector and/or unclear collecting data. We anticipate that this new species is more broadly distributed, but considering the close similarity to
and unavailability of recently collected Peruvian material, we restrict the type series of this species to include only those from northwestern Bolivia and adjacent southeast Peru. Although
. We do not consider single genes, particularly COI, to offer significant phylogenetic signal, especially considering recent work refuting species delimitation based on genetic evidence alone (
<bibRefCitationid="CC1C038BC51EF511FFEBBA0AB879CC15"author="Sukumaran, J"journalOrPublisher="Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"pageId="22"pageNumber="119"pagination="1607 - 1612"title="Multispecies coalescent delimits structure, not species."url="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607921114"volume="114"year="2017">Sukumaran and Knowles 2017</bibRefCitation>
), thus we include the tree in Fig. 7 merely as additional evidence differentiating the Amazonian
In the NHMUK, the Peruvian specimens were collected both during the "dry season" and "wet season" with those specimens from the dry season being smaller overall than those from the wet season. No significant genitalia differences were noted between these sets of specimens however.
