treatments-xml/data/D5/5C/96/D55C9623452CF3D0D1625D79245D03BC.xml
2024-06-21 12:53:16 +02:00

111 lines
11 KiB
XML

<document id="8038EEAAE0443E961DAE598253852CFD" ENCODING="UTF8" ID-GBIF-Dataset="849a9d10-c07c-46b2-8104-40991f863c9a" ModsDocAuthor="van der Hammen, L." ModsDocDate="1959" ModsDocID="ORI111" ModsDocOrigin="http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/148866" ModsDocTitle="Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites" checkinTime="1326879907731" checkinUser="thomas" docAuthor="van der Hammen, L." docDate="1959" docId="D55C9623452CF3D0D1625D79245D03BC" docLanguage="en" docName="vanderHammen1959_gg1.xml" docOrigin="Zoologische Verhandelingen 40" docSource="http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/148866" docTitle="Meristacarus rubescens" docType="treatment" docVersion="11" lastPageNumber="60" masterDocId="21A98ADFF4D6ACB8C046B731D66A6379" masterDocTitle="Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites" masterLastPageNumber="93" masterPageNumber="1" pageNumber="60" updateTime="1701313550157" updateUser="plazi">
<mods:mods id="5B07AEE3FBE9F03BA8689C73A2ADF40D" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods:titleInfo id="B4FEAD1DFEB9EB2DE95764F05C39B544">
<mods:title id="4BEF82C7CAF5F30A95D80FE1E1E0F9B0">Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:name id="772B347AE86E4225F03BECF0AD5C8B1D" type="personal">
<mods:role id="727CDC71B5FC4744F251F3E41A8A888E">
<mods:roleTerm id="B5F144D811BBE82905E4A414424C4482">Author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart id="BCAD2D38B29BFE2E5E5BF3CA06CE5DFC">van der Hammen, L.</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:typeOfResource id="F12B55807BF753A85F2C48C82412EA8C">text</mods:typeOfResource>
<mods:relatedItem id="11B37082AA39E1D19AE6AE60D1DD54CD" type="host">
<mods:titleInfo id="43D9CEE9D5D1706CDEE1E0BB467BC815">
<mods:title id="3A58EAF1700201646FF2504133DF9F54">Zoologische Verhandelingen</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:part id="44A0FC6A8B3BA41214AAF34D2B1E525B">
<mods:date id="DBD963D4770F6501C9F69793AC4FC9FD">1959</mods:date>
<mods:detail id="454C0A9CF6021045073667E38B43D8CF" type="volume">
<mods:number id="2E51CDC199AD65BC471186393BAFD379">40</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:extent id="BA5AA77420082FE222ACED3689ACE8DD" unit="page">
<mods:start id="579E936B82C966FFACFD477D3DAAE77C">1</mods:start>
<mods:end id="D382190EC8262BDBE4620E922D4692E2">93</mods:end>
</mods:extent>
</mods:part>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:location id="93D1FDA58A7EEE4300C30E2944918912">
<mods:url id="8E48E0309AA484FF1CD25C0F25BDFD21">http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/148866</mods:url>
</mods:location>
<mods:classification id="9420679F16CD561A3939F01917433987">journal article</mods:classification>
<mods:identifier id="CB8C3B7BCE6BEF89E0D74ABA1AEFF1D9" type="Plazi-Custom">ORI111</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="BD5A3651D1739992C53E043C3272E8E4" type="ZooBank">0DC6B575-3CB3-41C1-A3EC-850520AE4487</mods:identifier>
</mods:mods>
<treatment id="D55C9623452CF3D0D1625D79245D03BC" ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285521" ID-GBIF-Taxon="100122974" ID-Zenodo-Dep="6285521" LSID="urn:lsid:plazi:treatment:D55C9623452CF3D0D1625D79245D03BC" httpUri="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D55C9623452CF3D0D1625D79245D03BC" lastPageNumber="60" pageNumber="60">
<subSubSection id="CB17BE200599946839BF91C279FA71D9" type="nomenclature">
<paragraph id="7B1EFB56DBBBA8B2DF4FA9FF9FA48DE0" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
<taxonomicName id="D119C9CAB94DA72B7304AF5FDE7BACFB" ID-CoL="73BBM" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="rubescens">
<pageBreakToken id="054419E060664C4C3102BA1C2157B27E" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" start="start">Meristacarus</pageBreakToken>
rubescens
</taxonomicName>
(Canestrini, 1897)
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="7671D932FE7CD9F07152E8B34A658D3A" type="reference_group">
<paragraph id="BF05D6EB364BBBE2E806D1F522D3B016" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
<taxonomicName id="33BF0A532F78CBD019B9B5A7CBDF2A71" class="Arachnida" family="Hermanniidae" genus="Hermannia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="rubescens">Hermannia rubescens Canestrini</taxonomicName>
, 1897, pp. 461, 467; 1898, p. 393 (sep. p. 9), pl. 24 fig. 4.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="FB9DFA9656CE0F438DB06FC8999328F2" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
?
<taxonomicName id="97C6565836E8D47044D6BE2D34B2B3D1" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Lohmannia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="rubescens">Lohmannia rubescens</taxonomicName>
, Berlese, 1916a, p. 176.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="0BA350FCA0282017573296FEEC303701" type="distribution">
<paragraph id="79F626921206884022E75655AC83AFC3" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
The type-material of
<taxonomicName id="02BE8505505AA68634BE9379DB7703AF" class="Arachnida" family="Hermanniidae" genus="Hermannia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="rubescens">Hermannia rubescens Canestrini</taxonomicName>
originates from Seleo (Berlin Harbor, Territory of New Guinea); I do not know if it is still in existence.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="7FFDB76A3E927CE175B4D40195A5A09D" type="discussion">
<paragraph id="D7966C4AC1413F5E59FAB27068E82CAF" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
Canestrini published two descriptions of the species, which are nearly exactly similar; the second description is accompanied by a superficial figure of the ventral surface, which strongly reminds of a
<taxonomicName id="ADF419BEDC948AE0CBD262C8849ED7D6" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Meristacarus</taxonomicName>
. The outline of the body is elliptic. The prae-anal plate is distinct. The genital plates are not divided; Canestrini probably overlooked the separate anals. The data mentioned about the structure of the mandible agree with those known in other
<taxonomicName id="958798A1A78EDFD618F972E9475A39CB" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="family">Lohmanniidae</taxonomicName>
, with the exception of the fact that Canestrini did not observe the fourth (paraxial) tooth of the fixed finger. The sensillus is described as filiform, but Canestrini probably overlooked the pinnate structure. The exorbitant measurements (2.20 X 1.00 mm) are exactly two times as large as in the type-species of the genus
<taxonomicName id="5739A5CFE649D662833480ED27AC9099" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Meristacarus</taxonomicName>
; it is not impossible that Canestrini made a mistake in his calculation.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="0964D446620009FF704577BA4784FB73" type="materials_examined">
<paragraph id="2E63342F5A34B562BD657F2BCC7AD08D" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
I myself repeatedly collected a
<taxonomicName id="511D5F34882EB107BD6120DFAC513D58" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Meristacarus</taxonomicName>
species in New Guinea, which is closely related to
<taxonomicName id="353D9AF0BDF440E739028F189B5C4C7A" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" genus.outerRound="1" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="porcula">M. porcula</taxonomicName>
. When studied in air, in reflected light, at a faint enlargement, the ventral surface of this species shows a distinct similarity to Canestrini's figure 4.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="37FCAD437D882834FE5A41D37AF3C5DA" type="discussion">
<paragraph id="4D1448126BF400D01CCB26DB4008ADD9" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
As mentioned above Canestrini described
<taxonomicName id="9F6762066E78D1E5F1406764D869CB10" class="Arachnida" family="Hermanniidae" genus="Hermannia" genus.completionEvidence="missing, matching species" genus.innerRound="1" genus.outerRound="1" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="rubescens">rubescens</taxonomicName>
as a
<taxonomicName id="5CE60D462B62C0473EF208F07A95FC8B" class="Arachnida" family="Hermanniidae" genus="Hermannia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Hermannia</taxonomicName>
, without any explication; Berlese (1916a) added the species to the genus
<taxonomicName id="66338E041E61B446FF5478578AB0D1F4" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Lohmannia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Lohmannia</taxonomicName>
.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="11B8793EFEA2531BAC089299CDCDC149" type="materials_examined">
<paragraph id="FA80876F6E4F27D2F9FB32191129493B" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
In the Berlese Collection several preparations labelled as
<taxonomicName id="E73872DA0972DFA3A704CAC88739522A" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Lohmannia" genus.bestMatchDistance="280" genus.bestMatchVote="2" genus.innerRound="1" genus.outerRound="1" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="rubescens">L. rubescens</taxonomicName>
are present; none of these originates from New Guinea, and I do not know if Berlese indeed compared his specimens with the type. I studied slide no. 137/14 from Semarang, Java; this preparation strongly reminds of
<taxonomicName id="E0ED5CC58A819942C526434BF76D2143" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" genus.outerRound="1" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="porcula">M. porcula</taxonomicName>
, but the barbules of the notogastral hairs are distinctly longer.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="B0CCC87D527F370041263E66D642C6A4" type="discussion">
<paragraph id="A205DE1F7B23C3C76A45377458ABBD75" pageId="59" pageNumber="60">
A study of the variability of my own
<taxonomicName id="BD16C7FAF7A0A5996B1DF46C4CA16144" class="Arachnida" family="Lohmanniidae" genus="Meristacarus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Sarcoptiformes" pageId="59" pageNumber="60" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Meristacarus</taxonomicName>
specimens will certainly be helpful in solving this problem.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
</treatment>
</document>