139 lines
13 KiB
XML
139 lines
13 KiB
XML
<document ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5193634" ID-GBIF-Dataset="a02f182b-32e4-4649-afe0-983cb21ceb9e" ID-GBIF-Taxon="160690028" ID-Zenodo-Dep="5193634" approvalRequired="5" approvalRequired_for_illustrations="3" approvalRequired_for_treatments="2" checkinTime="1576077498408" checkinUser="jeremy" docAuthor="M. A. Lieftinck" docDate="1940" docId="03B487FFFFB8FFD3FF10B927FA4AACCE" docLanguage="en" docName="Lieftinck - 1940 - Descriptions and records of South-east Asiatic Odonata (II) ABBYYed.pdf.imf" docOrigin="Treubia 17 (4)" docStyle="DocumentStyle{}" docTitle="Amphicnemis smedleyi Laidlaw 1926" docType="treatment" docVersion="12" lastPageId="39" lastPageNumber="373" masterDocId="FF8DFF87FF9EFFF4FFF0BE36FF92AF52" masterDocTitle="Descriptions and records of South-East Asiatic Odonata (II)" masterLastPageNumber="392" masterPageNumber="337" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" updateTime="1632324461921" updateUser="ExternalLinkService">
|
|
<mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
|
|
<mods:titleInfo>
|
|
<mods:title>Descriptions and records of South-East Asiatic Odonata (II)</mods:title>
|
|
</mods:titleInfo>
|
|
<mods:name type="personal">
|
|
<mods:role>
|
|
<mods:roleTerm>Author</mods:roleTerm>
|
|
</mods:role>
|
|
<mods:namePart>M. A. Lieftinck</mods:namePart>
|
|
</mods:name>
|
|
<mods:typeOfResource>text</mods:typeOfResource>
|
|
<mods:relatedItem type="host">
|
|
<mods:titleInfo>
|
|
<mods:title>Treubia</mods:title>
|
|
</mods:titleInfo>
|
|
<mods:part>
|
|
<mods:date>1940</mods:date>
|
|
<mods:detail type="pubDate">
|
|
<mods:number>1940-01-01</mods:number>
|
|
</mods:detail>
|
|
<mods:detail type="volume">
|
|
<mods:number>17</mods:number>
|
|
</mods:detail>
|
|
<mods:detail type="issue">
|
|
<mods:number>4</mods:number>
|
|
</mods:detail>
|
|
<mods:extent unit="page">
|
|
<mods:start>337</mods:start>
|
|
<mods:end>392</mods:end>
|
|
</mods:extent>
|
|
</mods:part>
|
|
</mods:relatedItem>
|
|
<mods:classification>journal article</mods:classification>
|
|
<mods:identifier type="DOI">http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3571116</mods:identifier>
|
|
<mods:identifier type="GBIF-Dataset">a02f182b-32e4-4649-afe0-983cb21ceb9e</mods:identifier>
|
|
<mods:identifier type="Zenodo-Dep">3571116</mods:identifier>
|
|
</mods:mods>
|
|
<treatment ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5193634" ID-GBIF-Taxon="160690028" ID-Zenodo-Dep="5193634" LSID="urn:lsid:plazi:treatment:03B487FFFFB8FFD3FF10B927FA4AACCE" httpUri="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B487FFFFB8FFD3FF10B927FA4AACCE" lastPageId="39" lastPageNumber="373" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
<subSubSection box="[224,877,1809,1848]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" type="nomenclature">
|
|
<paragraph blockId="38.[219,1716,213,2650]" box="[224,877,1809,1848]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1926" box="[224,685,1809,1848]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="smedleyi">
|
|
<emphasis bold="true" box="[224,685,1809,1848]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">Amphicnemis smedleyi</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
<emphasis box="[714,869,1809,1840]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">LAIDLAW</emphasis>
|
|
.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</subSubSection>
|
|
<subSubSection pageId="38" pageNumber="373" type="reference_group">
|
|
<paragraph blockId="38.[219,1716,213,2650]" box="[222,1374,1868,1908]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
1915. RIS, Tijdschr. Ent. 58, p. 13 14. - ♀ Simaioer id. (
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1913" box="[1235,1355,1868,1904]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="louisae">
|
|
<emphasis box="[1235,1355,1868,1904]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">louisae</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
).
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
<paragraph blockId="38.[219,1716,213,2650]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
1926.
|
|
<emphasis box="[334,475,1921,1946]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">LAIDLAW</emphasis>
|
|
, J. Mal. Br. Roy. As. Soc. 4, p. 232 fig. 3 (apps. ♂). — ♂♀ Siberoet & Pagai Ids. (
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1913" box="[541,652,1965,1992]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="louisae">louisae</taxonomicName>
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1926" box="[672,822,1964,1996]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="smedleyi">smedleyi</taxonomicName>
|
|
).
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</subSubSection>
|
|
<subSubSection pageId="38" pageNumber="373" type="materials_examined">
|
|
<paragraph blockId="38.[219,1716,213,2650]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
<materialsCitation ID-GBIF-Occurrence="2467684717" collectingDate="1924-09" collectorName="C. Boden Kloss & N. Smedley" country="Indonesia" location="Siberoet Id" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" specimenCount="4" specimenCount-female="2" specimenCount-male="2">
|
|
Material studied: -
|
|
<specimenCount box="[718,781,2035,2066]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" type="male">2 ♂</specimenCount>
|
|
(ad, crushed),
|
|
<specimenCount box="[1094,1153,2033,2065]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" type="female">2 ♀</specimenCount>
|
|
(one ad., one juv.),
|
|
<collectingRegion pageId="38" pageNumber="373">Siberoet Id</collectingRegion>
|
|
.,
|
|
<collectingDate box="[301,491,2090,2128]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">Sept. 1924</collectingDate>
|
|
,
|
|
<determinerName box="[523,1121,2089,2121]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
C. Boden
|
|
<emphasis box="[715,825,2090,2120]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">KLOSS</emphasis>
|
|
& N. SMEDLEY
|
|
</determinerName>
|
|
, ex coll.
|
|
<collectorName box="[1306,1579,2086,2118]" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
F. F.
|
|
<emphasis box="[1423,1579,2086,2117]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">LAIDLAW</emphasis>
|
|
</collectorName>
|
|
</materialsCitation>
|
|
.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</subSubSection>
|
|
<subSubSection lastPageId="39" lastPageNumber="374" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" type="discussion">
|
|
<paragraph blockId="38.[219,1716,213,2650]" lastBlockId="39.[253,1753,198,2645]" lastPageId="39" lastPageNumber="374" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">
|
|
These specimens differ from
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Selys" authorityYear="1863" box="[887,1034,2179,2211]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="wallacei">
|
|
<emphasis box="[887,1034,2179,2211]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">wallacei</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
(=
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1913" box="[1135,1257,2177,2209]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="louisae">louisae</taxonomicName>
|
|
<emphasis box="[1282,1372,2178,2209]" italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">LAID</emphasis>
|
|
.) in a number of characters, which I have enumerated in the key to the species. The ♂ is easily distinguished from
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Selys" authorityYear="1863" box="[580,726,2287,2320]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="wallacei">wallacei</taxonomicName>
|
|
by the different shape of the superior anal appendages and by the absence of a prothoracic spine. The ♀ has been described at length by Ris. This species is obviously most closely related to
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Kruger" authorityYear="1898" box="[1225,1353,2445,2484]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="gracilis">gracilis</taxonomicName>
|
|
, KRUGER, and
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Lieftinck" authorityYear="1937" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="kuiperi">
|
|
<emphasis italics="true" pageId="38" pageNumber="373">kuiperi</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
, LIEFT., two species in which the prothoracic spine is either also reduced, or absent altogether. Apart from the differences found in the sculpturing of the hinder lobe of the prothorax, the ♂ of
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1926" box="[1031,1191,2609,2648]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="38" pageNumber="373" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="smedleyi">smedleyi</taxonomicName>
|
|
may be distinguished from that of
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Lieftinck" authorityYear="1937" box="[412,541,304,344]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="kuiperi">
|
|
<emphasis box="[412,541,304,344]" italics="true" pageId="39" pageNumber="374">kuiperi</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
by the presence of a black streak to the outer surface of all femora; it differs further from
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Lieftinck" authorityYear="1937" box="[838,966,357,396]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="kuiperi">
|
|
<emphasis box="[838,966,357,396]" italics="true" pageId="39" pageNumber="374">kuiperi</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
in the shape of the superior anal appendages, which bear a very close resemblance to those of
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Kruger" authorityYear="1898" box="[1339,1467,409,448]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="gracilis">gracilis</taxonomicName>
|
|
, being in fact practically identical with those of that species (pl. 16
|
|
<figureCitation box="[1334,1433,464,502]" captionStart="Fig" captionStartId="6.[1204,1266,2355,2387]" captionTargetBox="[1162,1759,1494,2334]" captionTargetPageId="6" captionText="Fig. 2. Ventral aspect of seminal vesicle (top) and left side-view of anal appendages of Euphaea subnodalis Laid., from Mt. Marapok (bottom)." figureDoi="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3571120" httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/3571120/files/figure.png" pageId="39" pageNumber="374">fig. 2</figureCitation>
|
|
). On comparing
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1926" box="[256,416,518,558]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="smedleyi">
|
|
<emphasis box="[256,416,518,558]" italics="true" pageId="39" pageNumber="374">smedleyi</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
with
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Kruger" authorityYear="1898" box="[530,657,518,558]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="gracilis">
|
|
<emphasis box="[530,657,518,558]" italics="true" pageId="39" pageNumber="374">gracilis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
, these species proved to resemble each other very closely, and I could find no other distinctive features than those mentioned already in the key to the species. Granting the characters of the prothorax to be constant, there should be no difficulty in separating them; but it is doubtful if these differences are of specific significance. In view of the rarity of these extremely delicate species in collections, it seems worth recording the observed differences even on the small series available. Personally I am of opinion that
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Laidlaw" authorityYear="1926" box="[256,416,894,933]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="smedleyi">smedleyi</taxonomicName>
|
|
is only a subspecies of the Sumatran
|
|
<taxonomicName authorityName="Kruger" authorityYear="1898" box="[1182,1311,893,931]" class="Insecta" family="Coenagrionidae" genus="Amphicnemis" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Odonata" pageId="39" pageNumber="374" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="gracilis">gracilis</taxonomicName>
|
|
, KRUGER.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</subSubSection>
|
|
</treatment>
|
|
</document> |