treatments-xml/data/03/C3/87/03C387D68A33224CEA846DC9EC7FFA80.xml
2024-06-21 12:22:17 +02:00

224 lines
28 KiB
XML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<document id="47F679AA6BBDDC524B24EA2C1D1D7DE3" ID-DOI="10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.1" ID-GBIF-Dataset="61bbe4a2-0c80-4fa7-915e-46cba4581f00" ID-ISSN="1175-5326" ID-Zenodo-Dep="271096" ID-ZooBank="6A79B596-26E0-454B-8830-D69FFCBC4684" IM.materialsCitations_approvedBy="felipe" IM.metadata_approvedBy="felipe" IM.taxonomicNames_approvedBy="felipe" checkinTime="1459847611809" checkinUser="plazi" docAuthor="Lonsdale, O. &amp; Marshall, S. A." docDate="2016" docId="03C387D68A33224CEA846DC9EC7FFA80" docLanguage="en" docName="zootaxa.4098.1.1.pdf.imf" docOrigin="Zootaxa 4098 (1)" docStyle="DocumentStyle:647186512141C8FC8976D5BCC54AEB7D.9:Zootaxa.2013-.journal_article" docStyleId="647186512141C8FC8976D5BCC54AEB7D" docStyleName="Zootaxa.2013-.journal_article" docStyleVersion="9" docTitle="Nothybus absens Lonsdale &amp; Marshall, 2016, spec. nov." docType="treatment" docVersion="12" lastPageNumber="14" masterDocId="FFFAFFAE8A382241EA13686EE977FF8D" masterDocTitle="Revision of the family Nothybidae (Diptera: Schizophora)" masterLastPageNumber="42" masterPageNumber="1" pageNumber="12" updateTime="1698224978163" updateUser="plazi">
<mods:mods id="C780872751F5FCDE370C3116F3BC6BB9" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods:titleInfo id="96862F66A34867F15D01FB5073178C55">
<mods:title id="0A5CFCCF683E377AD981713CB77D933B">Revision of the family Nothybidae (Diptera: Schizophora)</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:name id="FB8D656552DF68DD79485AF44597D7DA" type="personal">
<mods:role id="A28352F942C74D0DD39D49CF57D7D3E9">
<mods:roleTerm id="6A78F34BBF46E5257254BDC6AC4C6CB7">Author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart id="DAD6D72B962DC5E2CF386D07023EA5DA">Lonsdale, O.</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name id="E04577FB392D46A46BD5A8205603EA11" type="personal">
<mods:role id="D027130506FCF2CE2DE7F16670EA2D55">
<mods:roleTerm id="7A356A9F68A66EB377DD42A79240C957">Author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart id="7D7465078EB4436B2A302838CDAE1BF2">Marshall, S. A.</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:typeOfResource id="DED2B16BA5124F33D786CCEB3A929D54">text</mods:typeOfResource>
<mods:relatedItem id="90F9939887DAEA3DFADA4E92370259DB" type="host">
<mods:titleInfo id="364DB72A5E7F2A0AEC293705D09679EA">
<mods:title id="E713735305E80FBAA54FC1DBDC40C839">Zootaxa</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:part id="2F2B3887DD7DD7F32628AB4665AEF566">
<mods:date id="C7F9F9995E4015346C10A0D1E619ADBC">2016</mods:date>
<mods:detail id="CC474228DE64B7C57E5310DC216F7482" type="volume">
<mods:number id="454D5464070BA8A50641021CA03A9E4B">4098</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:detail id="F92B187ECD10270B46D6D0867BBFB207" type="issue">
<mods:number id="5477E05F310FAA690D45295B9925EEDD">1</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:extent id="21B70263A60EA50F60C464457FADB30F" unit="page">
<mods:start id="82DD1644C17725CF4D7263BAAD430669">1</mods:start>
<mods:end id="4A242F74C245014123327B15ABF698F5">42</mods:end>
</mods:extent>
</mods:part>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:classification id="60EAC87D9094DD96E6D4751132201D0A">journal article</mods:classification>
<mods:identifier id="6455333C1205360480E7B9A9464301DF" type="DOI">10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.1</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="00EF4A0612892D4D6B0ABE7AB6EA3A3A" type="GBIF-Dataset">61bbe4a2-0c80-4fa7-915e-46cba4581f00</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="DF7ECE108C9AD0DF39A061283618E8F0" type="ISSN">1175-5326</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="26CD5799CEF44095653087750F128339" type="Zenodo-Dep">271096</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="AF1EFCC3D948091323E664F4BC7B3722" type="ZooBank">6A79B596-26E0-454B-8830-D69FFCBC4684</mods:identifier>
</mods:mods>
<treatment id="03C387D68A33224CEA846DC9EC7FFA80" ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6053678" ID-GBIF-Taxon="119369843" ID-Zenodo-Dep="6053678" LSID="urn:lsid:plazi:treatment:03C387D68A33224CEA846DC9EC7FFA80" httpUri="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C387D68A33224CEA846DC9EC7FFA80" lastPageId="13" lastPageNumber="14" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<subSubSection id="C370654B8A33224AEA846DC9E86BFA6E" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" type="nomenclature">
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A33224AEA846DC9E896FA4F" blockId="11.[151,481,1447,1507]" box="[151,481,1447,1474]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<heading id="D09D81AC8A33224AEA846DC9E896FA4F" bold="true" box="[151,481,1447,1474]" fontSize="11" level="1" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" reason="1">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A33224AEA846DC9E896FA4F" bold="true" box="[151,481,1447,1474]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A33224AEA846DC9E814FA4C" ID-CoL="8GV32" box="[151,355,1447,1473]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="absens" status="sp. nov.">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A33224AEA846DC9E814FA4C" bold="true" box="[151,355,1447,1473]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Nothybus absens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
<taxonomicNameLabel id="A22D57A98A33224AEB796DC6E896FA4F" box="[362,481,1448,1474]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" rank="species">spec. nov.</taxonomicNameLabel>
</emphasis>
</heading>
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A33224AEA846DA4E86BFA6E" blockId="11.[151,481,1447,1507]" box="[151,284,1482,1507]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<figureCitation id="13512A458A33224AEA846DA4E86BFA6E" box="[151,284,1482,1507]" captionStart="FIGURES 5, 6" captionStartId="3.[151,264,1952,1975]" captionTargetBox="[196,1422,529,1928]" captionTargetId="figure@3.[192,1428,523,1936]" captionTargetPageId="3" captionText="FIGURES 5, 6. Nothybus absens spec. nov., holotype female, China, © S. A. Marshall. Fig. 7: N. lineifer Enderlein, Sabah, male, © S. Gaimari. Figs 8 10: N. sumatranus Enderlein, Vietnam, male, © S. A. Marshall." httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/271098/files/figure.png" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Figures 56</figureCitation>
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="C370654B8A33224DEA846E7CED54FE22" lastPageId="12" lastPageNumber="13" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" type="description">
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A33224AEA846E7CEA0FF9A6" blockId="11.[151,1437,1554,2015]" box="[151,888,1554,1579]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A33224AEA846E7CE856F9A6" bold="true" box="[151,289,1554,1579]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Description</emphasis>
(female only, based on field photographs—Figs 5, 6)
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A33224AEAD46E58EAEDF936" blockId="11.[151,1437,1554,2015]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A33224AEAD46E58E873F9C2" box="[199,260,1590,1615]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Head</emphasis>
: Base colour yellowish-brown with orange tint. Distal half of first flagellomere black, extending to distal 2/3 on inner surface. Face with ventral 2/3 silvery tomentose with small medial glossy black spot. Ocellar tubercle black. Frons with posterior velvety patch well-developed; anterior pair of patches fused on anterior half. Colour of clypeus and labellum unknown; palpus light yellow, at least apically.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A33224AEAD46EA8EDF9F81E" blockId="11.[151,1437,1554,2015]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A33224AEAD46EA8E86FF952" box="[199,280,1734,1759]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Thorax</emphasis>
: Base colour yellowish-brown with orange tint. Scutum with dark brown medial stripe bounded by four rows of acrostichal setulae, with margins ill-defined posteriorly. Scutellum and subscutellum dark brown. Dorsal margin of postpronotum brownish, with remainder of postpronotum covered by tomentose/iridescent stripe that continues to cover anterolateral margin of brownish notopleuron and most of anepisternum and katepisternum; remainder of anepisternum brownish; posterior region of notopleuron with second narrower, fainter tomentose stripe posteriorly joining broad anterior stripe on anepisternum. Laterotergites dark brown.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A33224DEAD46FF1EAD6FF5A" blockId="11.[151,1437,1554,2015]" lastBlockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" lastPageId="12" lastPageNumber="13" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A33224AEAD46FF1E988F83B" box="[199,255,1951,1974]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Wing</emphasis>
: Wing length unknown. Vein r-m surrounded by broad dark spot. Transverse stripe dark, surrounding dmcu and filling apex of cell r1; stripe extending apically to surround clear iridescent spots, with only spot in cell r2+3 open to wing margin; brown clouds surrounding dm-cu and apex of CuA1. Centre of wing apparently without iridescence (possibly not visible due to angle of wing in photograph).
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD4688AED73FECE" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD4688AE98BFF76" box="[199,252,228,251]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Legs</emphasis>
: Legs light yellowish with apices of femora (for a length slightly longer than width of apex) and tibiae brownish-black. Tarsi dark brown; fore basitarsomere white with base brownish-black for a length approximately equal to width of segment. Mid and hind coxae light yellow (base not visible).
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD46920ED54FE22" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD46920E846FEEA" box="[199,305,334,359]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Abdomen</emphasis>
: Tergites 13 dark brown with dorsum darker. Tergite 4 yellow with anterior margin, posterior margin and large posteromedial spot dark brown. Tergite 5 dark brown (texture not visible), possibly with posterlateral margin yellow. Remaining posterior segments yellow where visible.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="C370654B8A34224DEAD469D0E875FE76" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="etymology">
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD469D0E875FE76" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD469D0E839FE5A" bold="true" box="[199,334,446,471]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Etymology.</emphasis>
The specific epithet is Latin for “absent, missing, away, gone, physically elsewhere, nonexistent”.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="C370654B8A34224DEAD46A68EB5CFD92" box="[199,555,518,543]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="distribution">
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD46A68EB5CFD92" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" box="[199,555,518,543]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD46A68E817FD92" bold="true" box="[199,352,518,543]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Distribution.</emphasis>
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DEB746A68E8DDFD92" box="[359,426,518,543]" name="China" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">China</collectingCountry>
(Guangxi).
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="C370654B8A34224DEAD46A44EB3FFD06" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="materials_examined">
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD46A44EB3FFD06" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD46A44E8C6FDCE" bold="true" box="[199,433,554,579]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DEAD46A44E841FDCE" box="[199,310,554,579]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="holotype">Holotype</typeStatus>
.
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DEB5E6A44E8DBFDCE" box="[333,428,554,579]" name="China" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">CHINA</collectingCountry>
.
</emphasis>
Guangxi Province: near Nanning City, Damingshan National Reserve, Tianping Mountain, Ketao (??), 23°3042.70ʺN, 108°2635.76ʺE,
<quantity id="4C929B258A34224DE9016A21EA15FDEA" box="[786,866,591,615]" metricMagnitude="3" metricUnit="m" metricValue="1.241" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" unit="m" value="1241.0">1241m</quantity>
, bamboo forest, near stream,
<date id="FFD410008A34224DEEA66A21EC42FDEA" box="[1205,1333,591,615]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" value="2012-09-23">23.09.2012</date>
, Stephen A.
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DEAAA6A1CE86AFD06" box="[185,285,626,651]" name="Marshall Islands" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Marshall</collectingCountry>
(1♀, photo voucher only).
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="C370654B8A34224CEAD46AF8EC7FFA80" lastPageId="13" lastPageNumber="14" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="discussion">
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD46AF8EAA5FC0A" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD46AF8E838FD22" bold="true" box="[199,335,662,687]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Comments.</emphasis>
Fusion of the dark, velvety anterolateral patches on the frons is characteristic of this species and unique in the family. Also useful for diagnosis in combination are three clear, iridescent, linearly arranged subapical wing spots, a complete medial stripe on the scutum, a white fore basitarsomere with a narrowly black base, and a yellow tergite 4 with a brown anterior margin and posteromedial spot. There is some possibility that specimens of this or other Chinese
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A34224DE8366B48EBDFFCB2" box="[549,680,806,831]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="family">Nothybidae</taxonomicName>
are in the collection of the
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DE9F36B48ED54FCB2" box="[992,1059,806,831]" name="China" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">China</collectingCountry>
Agricultural University (Beijing,
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DEA846B24E9A9FCEE" box="[151,222,842,867]" name="China" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">China</collectingCountry>
), but that collection has been under renovation for the several years we have been working on this revision and loans remain impossible (Ding Yang, personal communication 2015).
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD46BFCE8CAFB62" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEAD46BFCE83BFC26" bold="true" box="[199,332,914,939]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Discussion.</emphasis>
The fly on which this description is based was photographed in the field, but not collected. According to article 73.1.4 of the International Code of
<bibRefCitation id="EFFB4B318A34224DE9036BD8ED94FC42" box="[784,1251,950,975]" pageId="12" pageNumber="33" refString="International Committee of Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4 th Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp." type="book">Zoological Nomenclature (I.C.Z.N 1999)</bibRefCitation>
, “designation of an illustration of a single specimen as a
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DE8446BB4EBCEFC7E" box="[599,697,986,1011]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="holotype">holotype</typeStatus>
is to be treated as designation of the specimen illustrated; the fact that the specimen no longer exists or cannot be traced does not of itself invalidate the designation”. Further, although article 16.4 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature requires all
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DEE636C4CEDAAFBB6" box="[1136,1245,1058,1083]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="holotype">holotypes</typeStatus>
that are “extant” to be deposited in a collection, the
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DE8326C28EBF4FBD2" box="[545,643,1094,1119]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" type="holotype">holotype</typeStatus>
of
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A34224DE8B96C29EA60FBD2" box="[682,791,1094,1119]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="absens">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DE8B96C29EA60FBD2" box="[682,791,1094,1119]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">N. absens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
escaped capture and cannot be considered “extant”. This description therefore meets the standards imposed by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and is further justified by its context as a significant component of a comprehensive revision, and the fact that the photographs of the
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DEB946CDDE8C0FB46" box="[391,439,1203,1227]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">type</typeStatus>
include enough information for an adequate description and confident subsequent recognition of the species.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224DEAD46C94EB2AF9DA" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
<bibRefCitation id="EFFB4B318A34224DEAD46C94EB61FA9E" author="Marshall" box="[199,534,1274,1299]" pageId="12" pageNumber="33" refString="Marshall, S. A. &amp; Evenhuis, N. L. (2015) New species without dead bodies: a case for photo-based descriptions, illustrated by a striking new species of Marleyimyia Hesse (Diptera, Bombyliidae) from South Africa. Zookeys, 525, 117 - 127. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 525.6143" type="journal article" year="2015">
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DEAD46C94E85CFA9E" box="[199,299,1274,1299]" name="Marshall Islands" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Marshall</collectingCountry>
&amp; Evenhuis (2015)
</bibRefCitation>
recently discussed the legitimacy, and the pros and cons, of describing new species on the basis of character evidence captured in photographs of lost
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DE9EA6D71ED5EFABA" box="[1017,1065,1311,1335]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">type</typeStatus>
specimens. While agreeing that preserved
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DEB196D2DE832FAD6" box="[266,325,1347,1371]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">types</typeStatus>
are usually essential and always preferable as a basis for new species descriptions, they pointed out that there are circumstances under which new species could be confidently recognized and defined on the basis of photographs even if the
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DEBB06DE5E8A4FA2E" box="[419,467,1419,1443]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">type</typeStatus>
specimen is lost. Their paper, illustrated with a description of a distinctive new species of
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A34224DEAA66DC0E83EFA4A" box="[181,329,1454,1479]" class="Insecta" family="Bombyliidae" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="family">Bombyliidae</taxonomicName>
, made a case for naming such species using the rules of nomenclature despite the absence of a
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DEF7F6DC1ECEBFA4A" box="[1388,1436,1455,1479]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">type</typeStatus>
specimen. Unsurprisingly, given the centrality of the
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DE8E86DBDEA5CFA66" box="[763,811,1491,1515]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">type</typeStatus>
concept in the science of taxonomy, the
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A34224DEF146DBCEC1CFA66" box="[1287,1387,1490,1515]" name="Marshall Islands" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Marshall</collectingCountry>
and Evenhuis paper ignited controversy, with both strongly supportive and vociferously negative comments. Given this set of circumstances it is necessary for us to discuss and further justify our decision to give
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A34224DEED56E74ECF2F9BE" box="[1222,1413,1562,1587]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="absens">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A34224DEED56E74ECF2F9BE" box="[1222,1413,1562,1587]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">Nothybus absens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
a name in the absence of a preserved
<typeStatus id="54D188628A34224DE8356E51EB2DF9DA" box="[550,602,1599,1623]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">type</typeStatus>
.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A34224CEAD46E0DEB1AFD95" blockId="12.[151,1437,151,2019]" lastBlockId="13.[151,1437,151,1293]" lastPageId="13" lastPageNumber="14" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
A revision such as this represents a compilation of all that is known about the taxonomy and distribution of the clade under study. It is routine to recognize towards the end of the long period required to complete such a revision that it is not possible to treat some component species in the same detail as others. A species might be represented only by a compression fossil, a badly damaged specimen, or a specimen of the “wrong” sex (for example, a female in taxa with important characters in the male genitalia). In such cases it is up to the judgement of the taxonomist whether to name the species or not but, in general, if there is no doubt that the species is distinct it will be given a name. Now that digital macrophotography has come of age and image collections are growing at a much faster rate than specimen collections, it is inevitable that some authors of taxonomic revisions will discover species represented only by photographs, perhaps because the authors themselves photographed but failed to collect a specimen or perhaps because the photographs were found in image collections made by others (just as we routinely find useful specimens in collections made by others). This situation is really no different from that routinely faced when only a damaged specimen or a singleton female is available, and the revising taxonomist should be free to use his or her judgement. If enough characters can be retrieved from the photograph to confidently recognize and define the species then science is best served by giving it a stable name. To put this argument in the context of the current revision, we are confident that the species described here as
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A35224CE9B7696AED15FE90" box="[932,1122,260,285]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="13" pageNumber="14" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="absens">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A35224CE9B7696AED15FE90" box="[932,1122,260,285]" italics="true" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">Nothybus absens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
is a distinct species, which gives us three choices about how to handle it: 1—ignore it until we get specimens, 2—name it informally as “
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A35224CEF446949ECEBFECD" box="[1367,1436,295,320]" name="China" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">China</collectingCountry>
undescribed
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A35224CEB366922E8F8FEE8" box="[293,399,332,357]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="13" pageNumber="14" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A35224CEB366922E8F8FEE8" box="[293,399,332,357]" italics="true" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">Nothybus</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
” or something to that effect, 3—give it a unique name in the hope that it will be a stable and universal name for the species. Publishing without mention of the species would be dishonest, and waiting for specimens could indefinitely delay an otherwise complete and useful revision. Use of an informal name for a distinct species seems a bit of a throwback to pre-Linnean nomenclature when the ICZN is in place to help ensure that names are unique, universal and stable. We thus choose option 3, but feel compelled to defend this choice against some of the anticipated criticisms.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A35224CEAD46A4AE823FCD0" blockId="13.[151,1437,151,1293]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">
The most serious criticism leveled against describing species without an extant
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CEE296A4BED1DFDB0" box="[1082,1130,549,573]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
is that such a description is “non-science”. This seems to suggest that describing this new species as “
<collectingCountry id="F37D76508A35224CE9DE6A29ED65FDED" box="[973,1042,583,608]" name="China" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">China</collectingCountry>
new species” would be acceptable, but naming it “
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A35224CEB546A03E8C0FD08" box="[327,439,620,645]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="13" pageNumber="14" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="absens">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A35224CEB546A03E8C0FD08" box="[327,439,620,645]" italics="true" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">N. absens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
” constitutes “non-science”. In fact, neither the nature of the name nor the presence or absence of a
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CEB386AFEE82CFD25" box="[299,347,656,680]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
has any bearing on whether a description constitutes “science”. Putative defining characters are testable by collection and examination of new material, with or without a
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CE9C86ADBED78FD40" box="[987,1039,693,717]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
. A
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CEE256ADBED11FD40" box="[1078,1126,693,717]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
can be studied in search of previously overlooked characters that might corroborate or refute the original hypothesis, but in practice this sort of work is normally done with non-type material. Preserved
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CE93A6A93EA2EFC98" box="[809,857,765,789]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
specimens can help resolve the identity of a taxon when the original description and illustrations prove inadequate, but they are not the distinction between science and non-science.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A35224CEAD46B06ED5CFBD5" blockId="13.[151,1437,151,1293]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">
A more commonly expressed criticism of a move towards describing species with lost
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CEEA56B06ED86FC0D" box="[1206,1265,872,896]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">types</typeStatus>
but with good photos is that it “sets a dangerous precedent” and that it opens the door to bad taxonomy. But this is faulty logic, as the door has always been open to bad taxonomy, albeit somewhat blocked by good reviewers and good editors. We think it will be much harder to slip poor work by reviewers, editors and the community when the basis for a description is an accessible image than when the basis is a dubious specimen deposited in a distant museum, especially a specimen deposited in one of many museums from which loans are difficult or impossible. But of course the ideal is to have both good images and good
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CE8EF6C2EEA5BFBD5" box="[764,812,1088,1112]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
specimens if possible.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BD536C08A35224CEAD46C0AEC7FFA80" blockId="13.[151,1437,151,1293]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">
There are drawbacks to a description without an accessible
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CE9946C0BEACCFBF0" box="[903,955,1125,1149]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">type</typeStatus>
. We would prefer to have a specimen to dissect, and to deposit for future study of further character sets. But, whether we call this species “new species x” or “
<taxonomicName id="4C6A4D438A35224CEAD06CC3E847FB48" box="[195,304,1196,1221]" class="Insecta" family="Nothybidae" genus="Nothybus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" pageId="13" pageNumber="14" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="absens">
<emphasis id="B91EEAD28A35224CEAD06CC3E847FB48" box="[195,304,1196,1221]" italics="true" pageId="13" pageNumber="14">N. absens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
”, our description of this species is a testable hypothesis that will stand or fall on the basis of future collections or observations. If the character states in our description turn out to apply to multiple species distinguishable only by male genitalia, then a
<typeStatus id="54D188628A35224CE8896C9BEB84FA80" box="[666,755,1269,1293]" pageId="13" pageNumber="14" type="neotype">neotype</typeStatus>
will be necessary and can be easily designated.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
</treatment>
</document>