166 lines
23 KiB
XML
166 lines
23 KiB
XML
<document id="F57B07048A56C111F8C95D94C71A08C0" ID-CLB-Dataset="298699" ID-DOI="10.21307/jofnem-2022-003" ID-GBIF-Dataset="f78b7a11-93a0-4029-8993-53561cf3e1f9" ID-ISSN="2640-396X" ID-Zenodo-Dep="11644663" IM.bibliography_approvedBy="juliana" IM.illustrations_approvedBy="juliana" IM.materialsCitations_approvedBy="juliana" IM.metadata_approvedBy="juliana" IM.tables_approvedBy="juliana" IM.taxonomicNames_approvedBy="juliana" IM.treatments_approvedBy="juliana" checkinTime="1718309315020" checkinUser="felipe" docAuthor="Gordon, Kara L, Schrimsher, Drew W & Lawrence, Kathy S" docDate="2022" docId="03BA87F3FFE2FB71FCF6FD3753FB2C0D" docLanguage="en" docName="JNematol.54.1.003.pdf" docOrigin="Journal of Nematology 54 (1)" docSource="http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2022-003" docStyle="DocumentStyle:DDD1F39569878942AA8312288C6178BF.2:JNematol.2018-.journal_article" docStyleId="DDD1F39569878942AA8312288C6178BF" docStyleName="JNematol.2018-.journal_article" docStyleVersion="2" docTitle="Meloidogyne incognita" docType="treatment" docVersion="6" lastPageNumber="13" masterDocId="FF83FF8BFFE9FB7DFFC0FFB7567C2E3C" masterDocTitle="Additional fertilizer and nematicide combinations on upland cotton to manage Rotylenchulus reniformis and Meloidogyne incognita in Alabama" masterLastPageNumber="15" masterPageNumber="1" pageNumber="12" updateTime="1718908242418" updateUser="ExternalLinkService" zenodo-license-document="CC-BY-4.0">
|
|
<mods:mods id="9642F9A06E9C8D3E3B7798EA14779EE5" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
|
|
<mods:titleInfo id="B472678C31C6ED2E3DC2094031AC6E5D">
|
|
<mods:title id="90AF2BCF5AD6751D3152090F8C1403C4">Additional fertilizer and nematicide combinations on upland cotton to manage Rotylenchulus reniformis and Meloidogyne incognita in Alabama</mods:title>
|
|
</mods:titleInfo>
|
|
<mods:name id="6E81B57FF0CDA63783D520B2C20A1F66" type="personal">
|
|
<mods:role id="22962E28D1085FA5CF6A625B1241327F">
|
|
<mods:roleTerm id="447DD8E72A8B1ED0AA9FD8103D0827BD">Author</mods:roleTerm>
|
|
</mods:role>
|
|
<mods:namePart id="8C16939BEEC9A236F14FF78CEE29A5E8">Gordon, Kara L</mods:namePart>
|
|
<mods:affiliation id="F72D82A2D6ABD3643800E33138342108">Auburn University, 559 Devall Dr. CASIC Building, Auburn, AL 36849.</mods:affiliation>
|
|
</mods:name>
|
|
<mods:name id="AFE5B6FAF0D315F5FB813A77246C9B68" type="personal">
|
|
<mods:role id="50F50DCA8C613AB0C6EB5F80DCA2ED3E">
|
|
<mods:roleTerm id="10DA9F9DB9B75F1EFA4A62BE7EBBC6F3">Author</mods:roleTerm>
|
|
</mods:role>
|
|
<mods:namePart id="9181D4DA8909F328148338D03BA1673E">Schrimsher, Drew W</mods:namePart>
|
|
<mods:affiliation id="8E039C41A4ABF7B263567A04FDE32B90">Auburn University, 559 Devall Dr. CASIC Building, Auburn, AL 36849.</mods:affiliation>
|
|
</mods:name>
|
|
<mods:name id="647F4F7EE3704A28C475AE26764EB688" type="personal">
|
|
<mods:role id="86368911F5897A78B317128C17306572">
|
|
<mods:roleTerm id="2C538E1F5CBD39FE3597DB79391732FC">Author</mods:roleTerm>
|
|
</mods:role>
|
|
<mods:namePart id="4C2DF5ED76E4EB495EE02D565E41F2AB">Lawrence, Kathy S</mods:namePart>
|
|
<mods:affiliation id="A9D2E81B7FFE3BC7FFD16D5D4C1105BB">Auburn University, 559 Devall Dr. CASIC Building, Auburn, AL 36849.</mods:affiliation>
|
|
<mods:nameIdentifier id="1426A1DC174FF9BED4D214A47C314770" type="email">lawrekk@auburn.edu</mods:nameIdentifier>
|
|
</mods:name>
|
|
<mods:typeOfResource id="4A03F1BA015D8A21F443E3AF3941F40E">text</mods:typeOfResource>
|
|
<mods:relatedItem id="C40000B996BB7B2682832FFC9535BAED" type="host">
|
|
<mods:titleInfo id="A2E30ED08DF2B1ACB8B1082949C3016D">
|
|
<mods:title id="4EE2C014950398D61B6D169F7D8B99B6">Journal of Nematology</mods:title>
|
|
</mods:titleInfo>
|
|
<mods:part id="E82B37157D428C6957347DF45ACFD592">
|
|
<mods:date id="8565803C92976FD0982265685EE2EAC2">2022</mods:date>
|
|
<mods:detail id="611CC131155804E05B318F254BB213A3" type="pubDate">
|
|
<mods:number id="8345368FB44B1EB1A7421D30AF11B402">2021-08-19</mods:number>
|
|
</mods:detail>
|
|
<mods:detail id="2852497E528A3E25548C9D3505960F72" type="volume">
|
|
<mods:number id="238AEDEC5B4D7F0489338E979943CB88">54</mods:number>
|
|
</mods:detail>
|
|
<mods:detail id="BE8F097C63DFFDAEDA2AD96B5E448DCB" type="issue">
|
|
<mods:number id="2447DA69E23B06DD8FA4184D3A7D8241">1</mods:number>
|
|
</mods:detail>
|
|
<mods:extent id="399D34F74D1873F664B02A3656B57CDE" unit="page">
|
|
<mods:start id="E2CDF52C10618FCEB9CD3CC1528CB548">1</mods:start>
|
|
<mods:end id="182331E65F5FC1009A8762807699D1B5">15</mods:end>
|
|
</mods:extent>
|
|
</mods:part>
|
|
</mods:relatedItem>
|
|
<mods:location id="D96C958D1417002A2676D4564A5512C8">
|
|
<mods:url id="0385BFFB7998D1A5E6242FF645B4F7C5">http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2022-003</mods:url>
|
|
</mods:location>
|
|
<mods:classification id="47B3BC55154713A354BF60FBB08C9F74">journal article</mods:classification>
|
|
<mods:identifier id="08C964E6415972B86F95653B242B7F8E" type="CLB-Dataset">298699</mods:identifier>
|
|
<mods:identifier id="AE360644B114C0396CB6C8438DCAC992" type="DOI">10.21307/jofnem-2022-003</mods:identifier>
|
|
<mods:identifier id="1181B24DC582B701D252851E02AAF951" type="GBIF-Dataset">f78b7a11-93a0-4029-8993-53561cf3e1f9</mods:identifier>
|
|
<mods:identifier id="06D87ABFEFA7F47B089FF8E8310E969D" type="ISSN">2640-396X</mods:identifier>
|
|
<mods:identifier id="A5B03A7B3B7A0D092853B3B3BB7428DB" type="Zenodo-Dep">11644663</mods:identifier>
|
|
</mods:mods>
|
|
<treatment id="03BA87F3FFE2FB71FCF6FD3753FB2C0D" ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12191735" ID-GBIF-Taxon="233242979" ID-Zenodo-Dep="12191735" LSID="urn:lsid:plazi:treatment:03BA87F3FFE2FB71FCF6FD3753FB2C0D" httpUri="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA87F3FFE2FB71FCF6FD3753FB2C0D" lastPageId="12" lastPageNumber="13" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
|
|
<subSubSection id="C309656EFFE2FB76FCF6FD3753122CA2" box="[822,1390,640,670]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" type="nomenclature">
|
|
<paragraph id="8BAC36E5FFE2FB76FCF6FD3753122CA2" blockId="11.[822,1390,640,670]" box="[822,1390,640,670]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
|
|
<heading id="D0E48189FFE2FB76FCF6FD3753122CA2" box="[822,1390,640,670]" fontSize="12" level="2" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" reason="2">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FCF6FD3753122CA2" bold="true" box="[822,1390,640,670]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FCF6FD3752FA2CA2" ID-CoL="8GCCK" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[822,1158,640,670]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">Meloidogyne incognita</taxonomicName>
|
|
field evaluation
|
|
</emphasis>
|
|
</heading>
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</subSubSection>
|
|
<subSubSection id="C309656EFFE2FB71FCF6FD0D53FB2C0D" lastPageId="12" lastPageNumber="13" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" type="discussion">
|
|
<paragraph id="8BAC36E5FFE2FB76FCF6FD0D5583286F" blockId="11.[820,1440,698,1907]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
|
|
At PBU, the combination that supported the largest root fresh weight sampled at PHS + FB was a nematicide ST + (NH4)2SO4 at PHS.
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FAC5FD4D55DD2D0F" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FAC5FD4D55DD2D0F" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">Meloidogyne incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
eggs per gram of root combined were lowest in the treatment combination of a nematicide ST + (NH4)2SO4 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS. This combination decreased
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FB0DFCCD53202DAF" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[1229,1372,890,915]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FB0DFCCD53202DAF" box="[1229,1372,890,915]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
eggs per gram of root by 15% when compared to the treatment of (NH4)2SO4 at PHS, with no nematicide. A study conducted by
|
|
<bibRefCitation id="EF824B14FFE2FB76FBE0FC6D53632DCF" author="Faske, T. R. & Hurd, K." box="[1056,1311,986,1011]" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" pagination="316 - 21" refId="ref10852" refString="Faske, T. R. and Hurd, K. 2015. Sensitivity of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis to fluopyram. Journal of Nematology 47: 316 - 21." type="journal article" year="2015">Faske and Hurd (2015)</bibRefCitation>
|
|
also found that a nematicide ST reduced
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FB4EFC4D53672A2F" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[1166,1307,1018,1043]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FB4EFC4D53672A2F" box="[1166,1307,1018,1043]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
population levels when compared to treatments with only a base fungicide. The combination of a nematicide ST + 28- 0-0-5 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB was the most effective at increasing lint yield. This combination also supported the largest seed cotton yield in the
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FC00FB0D522D2AEF" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[960,1105,1210,1235]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FC00FB0D522D2AEF" box="[960,1105,1210,1235]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
microplot trials in 2019 and 2020. The application of a nematicide ST (COPeO™ Prime) provided the greatest yield protection against
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FCF6FAAD55B22B0F" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[822,974,1306,1331]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FCF6FAAD55B22B0F" box="[822,974,1306,1331]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
in trials conducted by
|
|
<bibRefCitation id="EF824B14FFE2FB76FAC6FAAD55022B6F" author="Faske, T. R. & Allen, T. W. & Grabau, Z. & Kemerait, R. C. & Langston, D. & Lawrence, K. S. & Mueller, J. & Price, P. & Thiessen, L. D. & Wheeler, T." pageId="11" pageNumber="12" pagination="326 - 329" refId="ref10884" refString="Faske, T. R., Allen, T. W., Grabau, Z., Kemerait, R. C., Langston, D., Lawrence, K. S., Mueller, J., Price, P., Thiessen, L. D. and Wheeler, T. 2021. Beltwide nematode research and education committee report: field performance of seed and soil applied nematicides, 2020. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Vol 1: 326 - 329. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN." type="journal article" year="2021">Faske et al. (2021)</bibRefCitation>
|
|
. This finding contrasts with
|
|
<bibRefCitation id="EF824B14FFE2FB76FB1FFA8D55062B4F" author="Anderson, M. G. & Wheeler, T. A. & Woodward, J. E." pageId="11" pageNumber="12" pagination="239 - 241" refId="ref10539" refString="Anderson, M. G., Wheeler, T. A. and Woodward, J. E. 2012. Evaluation of variety tolerance and use of Vydate C-LV for management of southern root-knot nematodes. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Vol 1: 239 - 241. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN." type="journal article" year="2012">Anderson et al. (2012)</bibRefCitation>
|
|
who found applications of Vydate® C-LV did not have an impact on cotton lint yield. Nematicide applications were analyzed individually to evaluate lint yield responses. The application of a nematicide ST increased overall lint by 20%, a single Vydate® C-LV application increased overall lint by 11%, and sequential Vydate® C-LV applications increased overall lint by 5%.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
<paragraph id="8BAC36E5FFE2FB71FC9CF9ED57012F6D" blockId="11.[820,1440,698,1907]" lastBlockId="12.[149,768,184,1905]" lastPageId="12" lastPageNumber="13" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">
|
|
The largest mean profit was obtained with the combination of a nematicide ST + 28-0-0-5 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB. This combination also supported the largest lint yields, correlating increased lint yields with additional profit. Established on lower and upper profit, there is a 90% chance that if this combination is used in a
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE2FB76FB9BF8AD529B290F" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[1115,1255,1818,1843]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="11" pageNumber="12" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE2FB76FB9BF8AD529B290F" box="[1115,1255,1818,1843]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="12">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
populated field, profit will fall between $692.42/ha and $875.58/ha. The input cost of this combination was $83.67/ha, making it one of the most expensive treatment combinations. A study conducted by
|
|
<bibRefCitation id="EF824B14FFE5FB71FDE5FF6F54822ECD" author="Zimet, D. J. & Smith, J. L. & Kinloch, R. A. & Rich, J. R. & Hewitt, T. D." box="[549,766,216,241]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" refId="ref12444" refString="Zimet, D. J., Smith, J. L., Kinloch, R. A., Rich, J. R. and Hewitt, T. D. 2004. Use of Telone and Temik 15 G to improve yields and returns of cotton grown in Northwest Florida fields infested with root-knot nematodes. University of Florida Extension. Fe 318." type="journal volume" year="2004">Zimet et al. (2004)</bibRefCitation>
|
|
found that nematicide treatments in
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FDF1FF4F54C12F2D" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[561,701,248,273]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FDF1FF4F54C12F2D" box="[561,701,248,273]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
fields with fewer input costs had reduced lint yields resulting in partial net returns.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
<paragraph id="8BAC36E5FFE5FB71FF7DFEEF57872D8D" blockId="12.[149,768,184,1905]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
|
|
There was a decrease in
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FE32FEEF54F42F4D" authority="Linford & Oliveira, 1940" authorityName="Linford and Oliveira" authorityYear="1940" box="[498,648,344,369]" class="Chromadorea" family="Rotylenchulidae" genus="Rotylenchulus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="reniformis">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FE32FEEF54F42F4D" box="[498,648,344,369]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">R. reniformis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
eggs per gram of root and an increase in seed cotton and lint yield with the combination of a nematicide and fertilizer at either PHS or PHS + FB. Greater profit per hectare was obtained in
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FE6BFE6F54472FCD" authority="Linford & Oliveira, 1940" authorityName="Linford and Oliveira" authorityYear="1940" box="[427,571,472,497]" class="Chromadorea" family="Rotylenchulidae" genus="Rotylenchulus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="reniformis">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FE6BFE6F54472FCD" box="[427,571,472,497]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">R. reniformis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
infested soil with combinations that included at least one nematicide in combination with an additional fertilizer at either PHS or PHS + FB. The three highest profiting treatments from field trials had an additional application of (NH4)2SO4 at PHS or PHS + FB. The same trend was seen with
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FED2FD2F57DF2C8D" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[274,419,664,689]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FED2FD2F57DF2C8D" box="[274,419,664,689]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
; eggs per gram of root were reduced and seed cotton and lint yield increased in combinations with a nematicide ST + an additional fertilizer combination at PHS or PHS + FB. Profit increased in combinations with a nematicide in combination with an additional application of fertilizer at PHS or PHS + FB. The three highest profiting treatments from field trials had an additional application of 28-0-0-5 at PHS or PHS + FB.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
<paragraph id="8BAC36E5FFE5FB71FF7DFC0F53FB2C0D" blockId="12.[149,768,184,1905]" lastBlockId="12.[805,1423,183,561]" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">
|
|
Our finding suggests that utilizing a nematicide with a fertilizer will increase yield and profit for growers with
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FF59FC4F57512A2D" authority="Linford & Oliveira, 1940" authorityName="Linford and Oliveira" authorityYear="1940" box="[153,301,1016,1041]" class="Chromadorea" family="Rotylenchulidae" genus="Rotylenchulus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="reniformis">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FF59FC4F57512A2D" box="[153,301,1016,1041]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">R. reniformis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
or
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FEA0FC4F578E2A2D" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[352,498,1016,1041]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FEA0FC4F578E2A2D" box="[352,498,1016,1041]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
infested cotton fields. In
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FF77FBAF57342A0D" authority="Linford & Oliveira, 1940" authorityName="Linford and Oliveira" authorityYear="1940" box="[183,328,1048,1073]" class="Chromadorea" family="Rotylenchulidae" genus="Rotylenchulus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="reniformis">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FF77FBAF57342A0D" box="[183,328,1048,1073]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">R. reniformis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
field trials, 10 out of 10 fertilizer and nematicide combinations increased lint yields and 9 out of 10 combinations increased profits when compared to treatments with no nematicides. The three highest yielding combinations, a nematicide ST + (NH4)2SO4 at PHS and FB, a nematicide ST + (NH4)2SO4 + Vydate® C-LV at PHS and a nematicide ST + (NH4)2SO4 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS also had the largest profits. Combinations with applications of (NH4)2SO4 were the most economical in
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FDC5FA8F54E52B6D" authority="Linford & Oliveira, 1940" authorityName="Linford and Oliveira" authorityYear="1940" box="[517,665,1336,1361]" class="Chromadorea" family="Rotylenchulidae" genus="Rotylenchulus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="reniformis">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FDC5FA8F54E52B6D" box="[517,665,1336,1361]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">R. reniformis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
infested fields. These field trials suggested that the application of a nematicide ST increased lint yield by 8% and a single application of Vydate® C-LV increased lint yield by 19%. The addition of a nematicide ST increased profit by $32/ha and an additional application of Vydate® C-LV at PHS increased profit by $137/ha when compared to an additional fertilizer alone. In
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FE12F9AF5422280D" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[466,606,1560,1585]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FE12F9AF5422280D" box="[466,606,1560,1585]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
field trials, 10 out of 10 fertilizer nematicide combinations increased lint yields and profit when compared to treatments with no nematicides. The three highest yielding combinations were a nematicide ST + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB, a nematicide ST + 28-0-0-5 at PHS and FB, and a nematicide ST + 28-0-0-5 + Vydate® C-LV at PHS also had the largest profits. Combinations with applications of 28-0-0-5 were the most economical in
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FF59F88F575F296D" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[153,291,1848,1873]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FF59F88F575F296D" box="[153,291,1848,1873]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
infested fields. These trials suggested that the application of a nematicide ST increased lint yield by 20%, a single application of Vydate® C-LV increased lint yield by 11% and sequential Vydate® C-LV applications increased overall lint by 5%. The addition of a nematicide ST increased profit by $54/ha when compared to an additional fertilizer alone. The addition of a single application of Vydate® C-LV increased profit by $93/ ha and sequential applications of Vydate® C-LV at PHS and FB increased profit by $131/ha. In conclusion, our hypothesis that combining nematicides with fertilizers at PHS and FB plant growth stages can provide a management system for
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FB86FE4F52AA2C2D" authority="Linford & Oliveira, 1940" authorityName="Linford and Oliveira" authorityYear="1940" box="[1094,1238,504,529]" class="Chromadorea" family="Rotylenchulidae" genus="Rotylenchulus" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="reniformis">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FB86FE4F52AA2C2D" box="[1094,1238,504,529]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">R. reniformis</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
or
|
|
<taxonomicName id="4C134D66FFE5FB71FAC1FE4F53F12C2D" authority="(Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949" box="[1281,1421,504,529]" class="Chromadorea" family="Meloidogynidae" genus="Meloidogyne" kingdom="Animalia" order="Rhabditida" pageId="12" pageNumber="13" phylum="Nematoda" rank="species" species="incognita">
|
|
<emphasis id="B967EAF7FFE5FB71FAC1FE4F53F12C2D" box="[1281,1421,504,529]" italics="true" pageId="12" pageNumber="13">M. incognita</emphasis>
|
|
</taxonomicName>
|
|
infested cotton fields with potential for economic gains.
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</subSubSection>
|
|
</treatment>
|
|
</document> |