treatments-xml/data/AE/22/87/AE2287E34E02FF81FD4DF9E0A3BCFEA5.xml
2024-06-21 12:47:47 +02:00

183 lines
22 KiB
XML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<document id="4A32609261673486003C308D16DF8674" ID-CLB-Dataset="8095" ID-DOI="10.5252/z2010n3a1" ID-GBIF-Dataset="8f1c0fde-2086-43a6-bd59-d462151b5f02" ID-ISSN="1638-9387" ID-Zenodo-Dep="4521152" IM.materialsCitations_approvedBy="felipe" IM.metadata_approvedBy="felipe" IM.tables_requiresApprovalFor="existingObjects,plazi" IM.taxonomicNames_approvedBy="felipe" checkinTime="1612809657348" checkinUser="felipe" docAuthor="Rabet, Nicolas" docDate="2010" docId="AE2287E34E02FF81FD4DF9E0A3BCFEA5" docLanguage="en" docName="Zoosystema.32.3.373-391.pdf" docOrigin="Zoosystema 32 (3)" docSource="http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5252/z2010n3a1" docStyle="DocumentStyle:E638A3C99FA728B529662B46F84D75FD.3:Zoosystema.2009-2010.journal_article" docStyleId="E638A3C99FA728B529662B46F84D75FD" docStyleName="Zoosystema.2009-2010.journal_article" docStyleVersion="3" docTitle="Eulimnadia alluaudi Daday de Dees 1926" docType="treatment" docVersion="8" lastPageNumber="378" masterDocId="521BFF9B4E06FF84FF89FFCAA047FFF7" masterDocTitle="Revision of the egg morphology of Eulimnadia (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata)" masterLastPageNumber="391" masterPageNumber="373" pageNumber="377" updateTime="1698928426118" updateUser="ExternalLinkService" zenodo-license-document="CC0-1.0" zenodo-license-figures="CC0-1.0" zenodo-license-treatments="UNSPECIFIED">
<mods:mods id="C685387FE9EF04079A03AF85A91ECB37" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods:titleInfo id="19D429C840F8EA3CAAE4A1D1DF2AA2B1">
<mods:title id="79EA5A31A45EFCAE29425C066CD326B1">Revision of the egg morphology of Eulimnadia (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata)</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:name id="E97DE35B43745A44142040027B6BFFE7" type="personal">
<mods:role id="DF297E7821ECCFC6D89E231742872B8D">
<mods:roleTerm id="F332D8542CF7E984A2EFC169B966052F">Author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart id="EA332BFB30B5EF33076C3ED296A690CD">Rabet, Nicolas</mods:namePart>
<mods:affiliation id="69F18873455C17469BADA00C115C95BB">Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, UMR 7138, Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, CNRS UPMC MNHN IRD, case 05, 7 quai St Bernard, F- 75005 Paris (France) nicolas. rabet @ upmc. fr</mods:affiliation>
<mods:nameIdentifier id="44E5745A1CA6D76C6AD618DD7BB1F703" type="email">rabet@upmc.fr</mods:nameIdentifier>
</mods:name>
<mods:typeOfResource id="9043785B515D97E8AB7C068ADC88DA25">text</mods:typeOfResource>
<mods:relatedItem id="A78F77CC7C2D37EFC0D76FDB22ED9980" type="host">
<mods:titleInfo id="D7FEA4E35A08C1525C1DEE5E6B3533BD">
<mods:title id="AD3A4C5FC1BB61FD8637F6C31320E603">Zoosystema</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:part id="C047AA877F904235754190800764E2DA">
<mods:date id="789D79E06F141690546DAF0FCA63A3F0">2010</mods:date>
<mods:detail id="66BAF20354635D05904B897231082937" type="pubDate">
<mods:number id="BEBE7B66077D0CA2CC837EDFB803940A">2010-09-30</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:detail id="00CE730E7DA41FBE638951ADA0D8F14B" type="volume">
<mods:number id="0C57F77C1DB5C8AF33E1C3F4BB84B1AF">32</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:detail id="B26DDE3B95F0516989DFEB6FDEAF43A7" type="issue">
<mods:number id="5ADF9FF71AC69E7E2818E49395A57E9A">3</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:extent id="76BB3EFA8F780E6ACBE3E6F27889135F" unit="page">
<mods:start id="4A54EA6B9AB0F62C0E981F4EF88A022B">373</mods:start>
<mods:end id="101866C4126D4C892F771E04270A2A6B">391</mods:end>
</mods:extent>
</mods:part>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:location id="94B112447BD72D7F255F1AAC23ED652D">
<mods:url id="3450B26494CBBFC952C8C8086C9E3F19">http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5252/z2010n3a1</mods:url>
</mods:location>
<mods:classification id="90191586FE59AE795998F5BC3A685326">journal article</mods:classification>
<mods:identifier id="6A03FA6B2866D8FED7D1C7527C327B78" type="CLB-Dataset">8095</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="D4B99D2C902C14304933DA86BCD48A26" type="DOI">10.5252/z2010n3a1</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="4C3CBFBE3C5CD725E54550ED7476FFCC" type="GBIF-Dataset">8f1c0fde-2086-43a6-bd59-d462151b5f02</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="5B5C0232231076ED146C5360D8BD4221" type="ISSN">1638-9387</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="2944E553CED1248401F64FC73CBC2908" type="Zenodo-Dep">4521152</mods:identifier>
</mods:mods>
<treatment id="AE2287E34E02FF81FD4DF9E0A3BCFEA5" ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4552292" ID-GBIF-Taxon="177429298" ID-Zenodo-Dep="4552292" LSID="urn:lsid:plazi:treatment:AE2287E34E02FF81FD4DF9E0A3BCFEA5" httpUri="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE2287E34E02FF81FD4DF9E0A3BCFEA5" lastPageId="5" lastPageNumber="378" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">
<subSubSection id="6E91657E4E02FF80FD4DF9E0A3A8F992" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" type="nomenclature">
<paragraph id="263436F54E02FF80FD4DF9E0A4DDF9B2" blockId="4.[708,1178,1578,1637]" box="[708,1178,1578,1605]" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">
<heading id="7D7C81994E02FF80FD4DF9E0A4DDF9B2" box="[708,1178,1578,1605]" centered="true" fontSize="11" level="2" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" reason="2">
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E02FF80FD4DF9E0A4DDF9B2" ID-CoL="50bed678-6d1d-453c-8b4b-6cffaa8a8670" authority="Daday de Dees, 1926" authorityName="Daday de Dees" authorityYear="1926" box="[708,1178,1578,1605]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Eulimnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="alluaudi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E02FF80FD4DF9E0A3EEF9B2" bold="true" box="[708,937,1578,1605]" italics="true" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">Eulimnadia alluaudi</emphasis>
<bibRefCitation id="421A4B044E02FF80FC39F9E0A4DDF9B2" author="DADAY DE DEES E." box="[944,1178,1578,1605]" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" pagination="1 - 81" refId="ref9246" refString="DADAY DE DEES E. 1926. - Monographie systematique des Phyllopodes Conchostraces. Troisieme partie. Annales des Sciences naturelles, Zoologie, 10 e serie 9: 1 - 81 (= 505 - 586)." type="journal article" year="1926">Daday de Deés, 1926</bibRefCitation>
</taxonomicName>
</heading>
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="263436F54E02FF80FCE6F980A3A8F992" blockId="4.[708,1178,1578,1637]" box="[879,1007,1610,1637]" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">
<heading id="7D7C81994E02FF80FCE6F980A3A8F992" box="[879,1007,1610,1637]" centered="true" fontSize="11" level="2" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" reason="2">
(
<figureCitation id="BEB02A704E02FF80FCFEF980A3F2F992" box="[887,949,1610,1637]" captionStart="FIG" captionStartId="6.[113,123,1270,1287]" captionTargetBox="[113,1210,215,1235]" captionTargetId="figure-16@6.[453,845,548,895]" captionTargetPageId="6" captionText="FIG. 2.— Eggs morphology:A-D, Eulimnadia alluaudi Daday de Deés,1926,eggs from the type specimen;E-I, Eulimnadia chaperi (Simon, 1886), eggs from the type specimen; E, immature egg; F-I, mature eggs. Scale bars: A-C, E, F, 100 μm; D, G, H, 20 μm; I, 5 μm." figureDoi="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4521156" httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/4521156/files/figure.png" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">Fig. 2</figureCitation>
A-D)
</heading>
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="6E91657E4E02FF81FD2CF941A19EFF18" lastPageId="5" lastPageNumber="378" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" type="reference_group">
<paragraph id="263436F54E02FF80FD2CF941A4FDF954" blockId="4.[677,1210,1675,1699]" box="[677,1210,1675,1699]" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">
<treatmentCitationGroup id="069B11DB4E02FF80FD2CF941A4FDF954" box="[677,1210,1675,1699]" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">
<treatmentCitation id="A72A10E44E02FF80FD2CF941A425F954" author="DADAY DE DEES E." box="[677,1122,1675,1699]" page="567" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" year="1926">
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E02FF80FD2CF941A425F954" ID-CoL="50bed678-6d1d-453c-8b4b-6cffaa8a8670" authority="Daday de Dees, 1926: 567" authorityName="Daday de Dees" authorityPageNumber="567" authorityYear="1926" box="[677,1122,1675,1699]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Eulimnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="alluaudi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E02FF80FD2CF941A325F954" box="[677,866,1675,1699]" italics="true" pageId="4" pageNumber="377">Eulimnadia alluaudi</emphasis>
<bibRefCitation id="421A4B044E02FF80FCEFF941A425F954" author="DADAY DE DEES E." box="[870,1122,1675,1699]" pageId="4" pageNumber="377" pagination="1 - 81" refId="ref9246" refString="DADAY DE DEES E. 1926. - Monographie systematique des Phyllopodes Conchostraces. Troisieme partie. Annales des Sciences naturelles, Zoologie, 10 e serie 9: 1 - 81 (= 505 - 586)." type="journal article" year="1926">Daday de Deés, 1926: 567</bibRefCitation>
</taxonomicName>
</treatmentCitation>
, fig. 144.
</treatmentCitationGroup>
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FF1DA19EFF18" blockId="5.[113,473,215,239]" box="[113,473,215,239]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
<treatmentCitationGroup id="069B11DB4E03FF81FFF8FF1DA19EFF18" box="[113,473,215,239]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FFF8FF1DA163FF18" ID-CoL="eea94cf3-ce79-470c-bebb-5b0d7e859d5b" authority="(Daday de Deés, 1926)" box="[113,292,215,239]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Limnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="alluaudi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FFF8FF1DA163FF18" box="[113,292,215,239]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Limnadia alluaudi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
<treatmentCitation id="A72A10E44E03FF81FEB4FF1DA192FF18" author="BRTEK J." box="[317,469,215,239]" page="56" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" year="1997">
<bibRefCitation id="421A4B044E03FF81FEB4FF1DA192FF18" author="BRTEK J." box="[317,469,215,239]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" pagination="3 - 50" refId="ref9144" refString="BRTEK J. 1997. - Checklist of the valid and invalid names of the &quot; large branchiopods &quot; (Anostraca, Notostraca, Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata), with a survey of the taxonomy of all Branchiopoda. Zbornik Slovenskeho Narodneho Muzea, Prirodne vedy 43: 3 - 50." type="journal article" year="1997">Brtek 1997: 56</bibRefCitation>
</treatmentCitation>
.
</treatmentCitationGroup>
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="6E91657E4E03FF81FFF8FECDA259FD4C" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" type="materials_examined">
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FECDA159FE2F" blockId="5.[112,648,263,472]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
<collectionCode id="409AAE304E03FF81FFF8FECDA145FEEA" box="[113,258,263,287]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
<typeStatus id="F93088574E03FF81FFF8FECDA0E5FEEB" box="[113,162,263,287]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">TYPE</typeStatus>
LOCALITY
</collectionCode>
. —
<bibRefCitation id="421A4B044E03FF81FEA5FECDA242FEE8" author="DADAY DE DEES E." box="[300,517,263,287]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" pagination="1 - 81" refId="ref9246" refString="DADAY DE DEES E. 1926. - Monographie systematique des Phyllopodes Conchostraces. Troisieme partie. Annales des Sciences naturelles, Zoologie, 10 e serie 9: 1 - 81 (= 505 - 586)." type="journal article" year="1926">Daday de Deés (1926)</bibRefCitation>
reported two localities for this species. The first locality is considered as the
<typeStatus id="F93088574E03FF81FF3AFEF6A09AFEA3" box="[179,221,316,340]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">type</typeStatus>
locality, and that sample was studied here (south of
<collectingCountry id="5E9C76654E03FF81FF58FE9CA103FE99" box="[209,324,342,366]" name="Madagascar" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Madagascar</collectingCountry>
in Bekitro commune). The other locality is from Topani, between Sekuma in Kalahari state, collected by L. Schultze the
<date id="523510354E03FF81FE46FE41A2CFFE54" box="[463,648,395,419]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" value="1897-11-04">4 November 1897</date>
(Bostwana). It is possible that each population represents a separate species.
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FE25A0FBFDCB" blockId="5.[113,648,495,572]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
MATERIAL EXAMINED. —
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FEF0FE25A1BEFDF0" bold="true" box="[377,505,495,519]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
<collectingCountry id="5E9C76654E03FF81FEF0FE25A1B2FDF0" box="[377,501,495,519]" name="Madagascar" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Madagascar</collectingCountry>
.
</emphasis>
Manambahy, Bekitro, 1901, Ch. Alluaud,&gt;
<specimenCount id="308DFD7C4E03FF81FE35FDC0A25FFDD5" box="[444,536,522,546]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" type="egg">100 eggs</specimenCount>
(MNHN-Bp319)
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FD9EA259FD4C" blockId="5.[113,647,596,699]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
<collectionCode id="409AAE304E03FF81FFF8FD9EA0F4FD9D" box="[113,179,596,620]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">RANGE</collectionCode>
. — The present knowledge of egg morphology suggests this species is restricted to the
<typeStatus id="F93088574E03FF81FE3DFDA4A19AFD71" box="[436,477,622,646]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">type</typeStatus>
locality as defined above, in the south of
<collectingCountry id="5E9C76654E03FF81FEB7FD43A1F7FD56" box="[318,432,649,673]" name="Madagascar" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Madagascar</collectingCountry>
. The other population, in southern Africa, needs to be investigated.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="6E91657E4E03FF81FFF8FD38A205FB7D" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" type="description">
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FD38A179FCFC" blockId="5.[111,649,754,1162]" box="[113,318,754,781]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">EGG MORPHOLOGY</paragraph>
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FCD8A205FB7D" blockId="5.[111,649,754,1162]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
The eggs, collected in the bottom of the bottle and in position below the carapace, have a more or less cylindrical structure with a wider, very inflated side creating a pentagonal shape, though in some orientations the eggs seem to be spherical (compare eggs in
<figureCitation id="BEB02A704E03FF81FF4FFC7AA15EFC3C" box="[198,281,944,971]" captionStart="FIG" captionStartId="6.[113,123,1270,1287]" captionTargetBox="[113,1210,215,1235]" captionTargetId="figure-16@6.[453,845,548,895]" captionTargetPageId="6" captionText="FIG. 2.— Eggs morphology:A-D, Eulimnadia alluaudi Daday de Deés,1926,eggs from the type specimen;E-I, Eulimnadia chaperi (Simon, 1886), eggs from the type specimen; E, immature egg; F-I, mature eggs. Scale bars: A-C, E, F, 100 μm; D, G, H, 20 μm; I, 5 μm." figureDoi="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4521156" httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/4521156/files/figure.png" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Fig. 2A</figureCitation>
and
<figureCitation id="BEB02A704E03FF81FEDCFC7AA1EFFC3C" box="[341,424,944,971]" captionStart="FIG" captionStartId="6.[113,123,1270,1287]" captionTargetBox="[113,1210,215,1235]" captionTargetId="figure-16@6.[453,845,548,895]" captionTargetPageId="6" captionText="FIG. 2.— Eggs morphology:A-D, Eulimnadia alluaudi Daday de Deés,1926,eggs from the type specimen;E-I, Eulimnadia chaperi (Simon, 1886), eggs from the type specimen; E, immature egg; F-I, mature eggs. Scale bars: A-C, E, F, 100 μm; D, G, H, 20 μm; I, 5 μm." figureDoi="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4521156" httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/4521156/files/figure.png" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Fig. 2B</figureCitation>
with
<figureCitation id="BEB02A704E03FF81FE65FC7AA202FC3C" box="[492,581,944,971]" captionStart="FIG" captionStartId="6.[113,123,1270,1287]" captionTargetBox="[113,1210,215,1235]" captionTargetId="figure-16@6.[453,845,548,895]" captionTargetPageId="6" captionText="FIG. 2.— Eggs morphology:A-D, Eulimnadia alluaudi Daday de Deés,1926,eggs from the type specimen;E-I, Eulimnadia chaperi (Simon, 1886), eggs from the type specimen; E, immature egg; F-I, mature eggs. Scale bars: A-C, E, F, 100 μm; D, G, H, 20 μm; I, 5 μm." figureDoi="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4521156" httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/4521156/files/figure.png" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Fig. 2C</figureCitation>
). The furrows covering the main cylindrical part of the egg are parallel, but on the inflated side the furrows are randomly distributed. The furrow bottoms are narrow, while the ridges are large and round.In detail, the surface bears very small pores (
<figureCitation id="BEB02A704E03FF81FE44FB85A266FB9D" box="[461,545,1103,1130]" captionStart="FIG" captionStartId="6.[113,123,1270,1287]" captionTargetBox="[113,1210,215,1235]" captionTargetId="figure-16@6.[453,845,548,895]" captionTargetPageId="6" captionText="FIG. 2.— Eggs morphology:A-D, Eulimnadia alluaudi Daday de Deés,1926,eggs from the type specimen;E-I, Eulimnadia chaperi (Simon, 1886), eggs from the type specimen; E, immature egg; F-I, mature eggs. Scale bars: A-C, E, F, 100 μm; D, G, H, 20 μm; I, 5 μm." figureDoi="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4521156" httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/4521156/files/figure.png" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">Fig. 2D</figureCitation>
). Average egg height is
<quantity id="E1739B104E03FF81FF70FBA5A109FB7D" box="[249,334,1135,1162]" metricMagnitude="-1" metricUnit="m" metricValue="1.75" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" unit="mm" value="175.0">175 µm</quantity>
(n = 3,
<collectingRegion id="E44FF8174E03FF81FE2DFBA5A18FFB7D" box="[420,456,1135,1162]" country="Serbia" name="Sid" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">SD</collectingRegion>
=
<quantity id="E1739B104E03FF81FE6DFBA5A271FB7D" box="[484,566,1135,1162]" metricMagnitude="-3" metricUnit="m" metricValue="7.9" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" unit="mm" value="7.9">7.9 µm</quantity>
).
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="6E91657E4E03FF81FFF8FB64A3BCFEA5" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" type="discussion">
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FB64A092FB30" blockId="5.[112,649,1198,1700]" box="[113,213,1198,1225]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">REMARKS</paragraph>
<paragraph id="263436F54E03FF81FFF8FB04A3BCFEA5" blockId="5.[112,649,1198,1700]" lastBlockId="5.[676,1210,216,338]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">
Following
<bibRefCitation id="421A4B044E03FF81FF6CFB04A199FB1E" author="DADAY DE DEES E." box="[229,478,1230,1257]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" pagination="1 - 81" refId="ref9246" refString="DADAY DE DEES E. 1926. - Monographie systematique des Phyllopodes Conchostraces. Troisieme partie. Annales des Sciences naturelles, Zoologie, 10 e serie 9: 1 - 81 (= 505 - 586)." type="journal article" year="1926">Daday de Deés (1926)</bibRefCitation>
, the egg of this species was firstly described as “Ova membrana tuberculata tecta”. The drawings suggest that the egg is spherical and ornamented by numerous peaks, which is not exactly compatible with the egg described here. However, the examined eggs were in natural position and clustered, thus excluding contaminations. Pentagonal eggs are also known in
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FFF9FA06A086FA12" authorityName="Daday de Dees" authorityYear="1926" box="[112,193,1484,1509]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Eulimnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="geayi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FFF9FA06A086FA12" box="[112,193,1484,1509]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. geayi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
(see Martin 1989;
<bibRefCitation id="421A4B044E03FF81FE1BFA01A2C1FA11" author="PEREIRA G. &amp; GARCIA J. V." box="[402,646,1483,1510]" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" pagination="640 - 652" refId="ref9886" refString="PEREIRA G. &amp; GARCIA J. V. 2001. - A review of the clam shrimp family Limnadidae (Branchiopoda, Conchostraca) from Venezuela, with the description of a new species. Journal of Crustacean Biology 21 (3): 640 - 652." type="journal article" year="2001">Pereira &amp; Garcia 2001</bibRefCitation>
and this study) though in
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FE07FA21A244F9F2" box="[398,515,1515,1541]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Limnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="alluaudi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FE07FA21A244F9F2" box="[398,515,1515,1541]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. alluaudi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
the inflated side seems to be more inflated than in
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FDB8F9C1A2C0F9D3" authorityName="Daday de Dees" authorityYear="1926" box="[561,647,1547,1572]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Eulimnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="geayi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FDB8F9C1A2C0F9D3" box="[561,647,1547,1572]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. geayi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
thus presenting an outline more spherical than cylindrical. In addition the two species are distinct because in
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FF6CF9A0A172F974" authorityName="Daday de Dees" authorityYear="1926" box="[229,309,1642,1667]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Eulimnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="geayi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FF6CF9A0A172F974" box="[229,309,1642,1667]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. geayi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
the bottom of furrows seems to be larger and the ridges sharper, and not rounded as in
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FD57FF13A314FF05" box="[734,851,216,242]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Limnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="alluaudi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FD57FF13A314FF05" box="[734,851,216,242]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. alluaudi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
. Among typical
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FB81FF13A43AFF05" box="[1032,1149,216,242]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Limnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="alluaudi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FB81FF13A43AFF05" box="[1032,1149,216,242]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. alluaudi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
eggs, I found in the bottom of the bottle, one spherical egg identical to those described for
<taxonomicName id="E18B4D764E03FF81FBBDFED2A4E7FEC6" baseAuthorityName="Simon" baseAuthorityYear="1886" box="[1076,1184,279,305]" class="Branchiopoda" family="Limnadiidae" genus="Eulimnadia" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diplostraca" pageId="5" pageNumber="378" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="chaperi">
<emphasis id="14FFEAE74E03FF81FBBDFED2A4E7FEC6" box="[1076,1184,279,305]" italics="true" pageId="5" pageNumber="378">E. chaperi</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
; I interpreted it as a contaminant.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
</treatment>
</document>