treatments-xml/data/03/FF/87/03FF87B7FFDDFF9941EAFEEB1BEDFAD6.xml
2024-06-21 12:22:17 +02:00

139 lines
18 KiB
XML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<document id="067E961886ED15228E1197CB7483F1BE" ID-CLB-Dataset="29146" ID-DOI="10.11646/zootaxa.4422.2.6" ID-GBIF-Dataset="47816d99-6645-43ad-a52d-33cc68a6a7c7" ID-ISSN="1175-5326" ID-Zenodo-Dep="1455619" ID-ZooBank="F6658C2B-9681-430A-8975-7B3AE2C233EE" IM.materialsCitations_approvedBy="felipe" IM.metadata_approvedBy="felipe" IM.tables_requiresApprovalFor="existingObjects,plazi" IM.taxonomicNames_approvedBy="felipe" checkinTime="1539185629917" checkinUser="plazi" docAuthor="Shear, William A." docDate="2018" docId="03FF87B7FFDDFF9941EAFEEB1BEDFAD6" docLanguage="en" docName="zootaxa.4422.2.6.pdf" docOrigin="Zootaxa 4422 (2)" docStyle="DocumentStyle:647186512141C8FC8976D5BCC54AEB7D.9:Zootaxa.2013-.journal_article" docStyleId="647186512141C8FC8976D5BCC54AEB7D" docStyleName="Zootaxa.2013-.journal_article" docStyleVersion="9" docTitle="Buethobius huestoni Williams &amp; Hefner 1928" docType="treatment" docVersion="7" lastPageNumber="270" masterDocId="FFC6FFCFFFD6FF92417DFFAA1B3DFFD7" masterDocTitle="The centipede family Anopsobiidae new to North America, with the description of a new genus and species and notes on the Henicopidae of North America and the Anopsobiidae of the Northern Hemisphere (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha)" masterLastPageNumber="283" masterPageNumber="259" pageNumber="270" updateTime="1698573810455" updateUser="ExternalLinkService">
<mods:mods id="5EF07879D8638D5D329793B6942FFC76" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods:titleInfo id="91D08F0CB4D43CD4F9CD7BE0354AA3E9">
<mods:title id="F9A88323806864BD01C0E0DDB0EADC24">The centipede family Anopsobiidae new to North America, with the description of a new genus and species and notes on the Henicopidae of North America and the Anopsobiidae of the Northern Hemisphere (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha)</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:name id="265364C97248EA4C3D5BCBB4CE5610C1" type="personal">
<mods:role id="7805256A67BF50D3C9241315F9765F2F">
<mods:roleTerm id="2FA714071CE1F359E4C2D18694750C95">Author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart id="BD33875DBC6185EFFA864D0B77F65090">Shear, William A.</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:typeOfResource id="BFEF4CA275A3FB283D8C6F0E066CA66A">text</mods:typeOfResource>
<mods:relatedItem id="FFC4E3B3ED3C46652E3C417F707FB6A3" type="host">
<mods:titleInfo id="A20D0BDBE95617F4C432C47DE98492C7">
<mods:title id="FF8AA69990BB9C1E13D5D5F894736DFD">Zootaxa</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:part id="CC667FF7F07B7AB20538D31EE2EB34D1">
<mods:date id="B6731E684166D0A518F11191F9256709">2018</mods:date>
<mods:detail id="390D564293D9A1C8470A4C9C6AE75EAA" type="volume">
<mods:number id="294CFF391D924CC2BB50A8FA4EDDBF62">4422</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:detail id="6867D47C6291DFC0917CFFEA36E2220B" type="issue">
<mods:number id="3D833A60D728C88FBB17B88C15292FF8">2</mods:number>
</mods:detail>
<mods:extent id="13435EA466D53F09E80A94D577444A32" unit="page">
<mods:start id="B8D6EACE807EF518A2417D8FC98388F7">259</mods:start>
<mods:end id="D1644A29E6270BB0CBC9873486245800">283</mods:end>
</mods:extent>
</mods:part>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:classification id="CFFB57538344087C56501F9B4D4D3470">journal article</mods:classification>
<mods:identifier id="B9821F7FFA338C2A5A0892BFE3CF196E" type="CLB-Dataset">29146</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="E9354BC16E8AD592A926DB200020F8CB" type="DOI">10.11646/zootaxa.4422.2.6</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="3FBDAB184F3CB2199CAC00859E1E3539" type="GBIF-Dataset">47816d99-6645-43ad-a52d-33cc68a6a7c7</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="77E549FE88CF58151E191E144B6F73F4" type="ISSN">1175-5326</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="D7827EC29516CC15E13A87127FA743D8" type="Zenodo-Dep">1455619</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier id="160A53ED5331DE4C583A67C19C7C0856" type="ZooBank">F6658C2B-9681-430A-8975-7B3AE2C233EE</mods:identifier>
</mods:mods>
<treatment id="03FF87B7FFDDFF9941EAFEEB1BEDFAD6" ID-DOI="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5969827" ID-GBIF-Taxon="148671727" ID-Zenodo-Dep="5969827" LSID="urn:lsid:plazi:treatment:03FF87B7FFDDFF9941EAFEEB1BEDFAD6" httpUri="http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF87B7FFDDFF9941EAFEEB1BEDFAD6" lastPageNumber="270" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<subSubSection id="C34C652AFFDDFF9941EAFEEB19F3FE8C" box="[151,718,321,347]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" type="nomenclature">
<paragraph id="8BE936A1FFDDFF9941EAFEEB19F3FE8C" blockId="11.[151,718,321,347]" box="[151,718,321,347]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<heading id="D0A181CDFFDDFF9941EAFEEB19F3FE8C" bold="true" box="[151,718,321,347]" fontSize="11" level="1" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" reason="1">
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF9941EAFEEB19F3FE8C" authority="Williams &amp; Hefner, 1928" authorityName="Williams &amp; Hefner" authorityYear="1928" box="[151,718,321,347]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF9941EAFEEB19F3FE8C" bold="true" box="[151,718,321,347]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF9941EAFEEB1AACFE8C" bold="true" box="[151,401,321,347]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Buethobius huestoni</emphasis>
<bibRefCitation id="EFC74B50FFDDFF9940E5FEEB19F3FE8C" box="[408,718,321,347]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" refId="ref17312" refString="Williams, S. R. &amp; Hefner, R. A. (1928) The millipedes and centipedes of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin, 4, 91 - 146." type="journal article">Williams &amp; Hefner, 1928</bibRefCitation>
</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
</heading>
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
<subSubSection id="C34C652AFFDDFF9941EAFE221BEDFAD6" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" type="reference_group">
<paragraph id="8BE936A1FFDDFF9941EAFE221F7AFE49" blockId="11.[151,1095,392,414]" box="[151,1095,392,414]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<treatmentCitationGroup id="AB46118FFFDDFF9941EAFE221F7AFE49" box="[151,1095,392,414]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF9941EAFE2219A0FE49" authority="Williams &amp; Hefner 1928: 139" authorityName="Williams &amp; Hefner" authorityPageNumber="139" authorityYear="1928" box="[151,669,392,414]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF9941EAFE221A58FE49" box="[151,357,392,414]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Buethobius huestoni</emphasis>
<treatmentCitation id="0AF710B0FFDDFF994016FE2219A0FE49" author="" box="[363,669,392,414]" page="139" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<bibRefCitation id="EFC74B50FFDDFF994016FE221957FE49" box="[363,618,392,414]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" refId="ref17312" refString="Williams, S. R. &amp; Hefner, R. A. (1928) The millipedes and centipedes of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin, 4, 91 - 146." type="journal article">Williams &amp; Hefner 1928</bibRefCitation>
: 139
</treatmentCitation>
</taxonomicName>
;
<treatmentCitation id="0AF710B0FFDDFF9943DAFE221858FE49" author="" box="[679,869,392,414]" page="44" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<bibRefCitation id="EFC74B50FFDDFF9943DAFE22187FFE49" box="[679,834,392,414]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" refId="ref16977" refString="Mercurio, R. J. (2010) An annotated catalog of the centipedes (Chilopoda) from the United States of America, Canada and Greenland (1758 - 2008). XLibris Corporation, Bloomington, IN, 559 pp." type="book chapter">Mercurio 2010</bibRefCitation>
: 44
</treatmentCitation>
(complete references)
</treatmentCitationGroup>
</paragraph>
<paragraph id="8BE936A1FFDDFF9941EAFE601BEDFAD6" blockId="11.[151,1437,458,1281]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
The description is brief, but contains more detail than that of the following species. Nevertheless, key characters go unmentioned. Deep red in color,
<quantity id="4CAE9B44FFDDFF994378FE45196EFDD1" box="[517,595,495,519]" metricMagnitude="-2" metricUnit="m" metricValue="1.0" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" unit="mm" value="10.0">10 mm</quantity>
long, “antennae long, more than 30 segments,” coxal pores “2, 3, 3, 24, 5, 5, 5.”
<bibRefCitation id="EFC74B50FFDDFF9941A1FDB81925FDFC" box="[220,536,530,555]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" refId="ref17312" refString="Williams, S. R. &amp; Hefner, R. A. (1928) The millipedes and centipedes of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin, 4, 91 - 146." type="journal article">Williams and Hefner (1928)</bibRefCitation>
also state: “No pigmented ocelli; a light spot which resembles a non-pigmented area.” Interestingly, the margins of the coxosternum are said to have no teeth. The descriptions by Williams and Hefner of their
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF994028FDF11AEEFDA4" ID-CoL="62GTT" authorityName="Chamberlin" authorityYear="1911" box="[341,467,603,627]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF994028FDF11AEEFDA4" box="[341,467,603,627]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Buethobius</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
species are accompanied by two crude drawings, labelled only as “
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF99447AFDF11EA1FDA4" box="[1287,1436,603,627]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF99447AFDF11EB2FDA4" ID-CoL="62GTT" authorityName="Chamberlin" authorityYear="1911" box="[1287,1423,603,627]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Buethobius</taxonomicName>
,”
</emphasis>
without reference to either species. However,
<figureCitation id="136D2A24FFDDFF9943E8FDD419C5FD40" box="[661,760,638,663]" captionStart="FIGURE 26" captionStartId="19.[151,250,1114,1136]" captionTargetBox="[151,1436,195,1093]" captionTargetId="figure@19.[151,1436,195,1093]" captionTargetPageId="19" captionText="FIGURE 26. An unidentified troglomorphic anopsobiid centipede from Lost Soldier Cave, Sequoia Kings Canyon National Park, California. Photograph courtesy of Jean Krejca." httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/1455633/files/figure.png" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Fig. 26A</figureCitation>
shows the posterior segments of a female with 5 coxal pores on the 15th coxa, and
<figureCitation id="136D2A24FFDDFF9940FBFD0F1AD4FD69" box="[390,489,677,702]" captionStart="FIGURE 26" captionStartId="19.[151,250,1114,1136]" captionTargetBox="[151,1436,195,1093]" captionTargetId="figure@19.[151,1436,195,1093]" captionTargetPageId="19" captionText="FIGURE 26. An unidentified troglomorphic anopsobiid centipede from Lost Soldier Cave, Sequoia Kings Canyon National Park, California. Photograph courtesy of Jean Krejca." httpUri="https://zenodo.org/record/1455633/files/figure.png" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Fig. 26B</figureCitation>
shows a male with a coxal pore formula of 2, 4, 4, 5. Since
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF9945F2FD0C1E0DFD6A" ID-CoL="NNVL" authorityName="Williams &amp; Hefner" authorityYear="1928" box="[1167,1328,677,701]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="translucens">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF9945F2FD0C1E0DFD6A" box="[1167,1328,677,701]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">B. translucens</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
is said to have coxal pores 2, 2, 2, 2, it seems reasonable to assume that the illustrations are of
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF994533FD601FE9FD36" box="[1102,1236,713,737]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF994533FD601FEDFD36" box="[1102,1232,713,737]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni">B. huestoni</taxonomicName>
.
</emphasis>
However, neither illustration shows the prominent process of the 15th coxa seen in other
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF99428CFD5A1F52FCDF" ID-CoL="62GTT" authorityName="Chamberlin" authorityYear="1911" box="[1009,1135,752,776]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF99428CFD5A1F52FCDF" box="[1009,1135,752,776]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Buethobius</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
species. Andrew Weaver collected intensively for many years in
<collectingRegion id="4992F843FFDDFF99432EFCBE19B6FCFA" box="[595,651,788,813]" country="United States of America" name="Ohio" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Ohio</collectingRegion>
and never encountered any species of
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF99453DFCBE1FF8FCFB" box="[1088,1221,788,812]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF99453DFCBE1FFCFCFB" ID-CoL="62GTT" authorityName="Chamberlin" authorityYear="1911" box="[1088,1217,788,812]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus">Buethobius</taxonomicName>
,
</emphasis>
though he claimed to have seen one specimen from
<collectingRegion id="4992F843FFDDFF994377FC921964FC86" box="[522,601,824,849]" country="United States of America" name="Illinois" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Illinois</collectingRegion>
matching the description of
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF9942E0FC931F21FC87" box="[925,1052,824,848]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF9942E0FC931F21FC87" box="[925,1052,824,848]" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">B. huestoni</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
(A. A. Weaver, unpublished data; this is may be the source of the
<collectingRegion id="4992F843FFDDFF994084FCF61975FCA2" box="[505,584,860,885]" country="United States of America" name="Illinois" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Illinois</collectingRegion>
record mentioned by
<bibRefCitation id="EFC74B50FFDDFF994243FCF618C4FCA2" box="[830,1017,860,885]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" refId="ref16977" refString="Mercurio, R. J. (2010) An annotated catalog of the centipedes (Chilopoda) from the United States of America, Canada and Greenland (1758 - 2008). XLibris Corporation, Bloomington, IN, 559 pp." type="book chapter">Mercurio [2010]</bibRefCitation>
since Weaver shared his unpublished notes widely), based on the inference that the species lacks coxosternal teeth. However, I found two specimens in the USNM collection labelled “
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF99437AFC0E18A8FC6A" authority="Oxford 1928" authorityName="Oxford" authorityYear="1928" box="[519,917,932,957]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni">Buethobius huestoni Oxford 1928</taxonomicName>
.” On the reverse, the handwritten label says “This is what we called
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF9940CCFC6219A4FC36" authority="Shear, 2018" authorityName="Shear" authorityYear="2018" box="[433,665,968,993]" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni" status="sp. nov.">Buethobius huestoni</taxonomicName>
<taxonomicNameLabel id="A21157C8FFDDFF9943DEFC6319DCFC37" box="[675,737,969,992]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" rank="species">n. sp.</taxonomicNameLabel>
we have only
<specimenCount id="9D50FD28FFDDFF9942F2FC6218DAFC36" box="[911,999,968,993]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" type="male">3 males</specimenCount>
so far.” The specimens, a male and a female, are in poor condition; one complete antenna has 38 segments and the pore counts conform to the range given by
<bibRefCitation id="EFC74B50FFDDFF994182FBBA1916FBFF" box="[255,555,1040,1065]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" refId="ref17312" refString="Williams, S. R. &amp; Hefner, R. A. (1928) The millipedes and centipedes of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin, 4, 91 - 146." type="journal article">Williams &amp; Hefner (1928)</bibRefCitation>
. I could not determine with certainty if an ocellus is present, but it appears it is not. As described in 1928, the forcipular coxosterna of both specimens have a straight, even margin lacking teeth. Leg-pairs 112 have single-segmented tarsi; the female retains leg 13, which has an incomplete suture dividing the tarsus. Neither specimen has legpairs 14 and 15. The coxae of legpair 15 do not have a distomesal spinous process. This combination of characters is unique in both anopsobiids and henicopids, so determining the status of
<taxonomicName id="4C564D22FFDDFF9944F9FB0B1BCBFB0B" authorityName="Shear" authorityYear="2018" class="Chilopoda" family="Henicopidae" genus="Buethobius" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Animalia" order="Lithobiomorpha" pageId="11" pageNumber="270" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="species" species="huestoni">
<emphasis id="B922EAB3FFDDFF9944F9FB0B1BCBFB0B" italics="true" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">B. huestoni</emphasis>
</taxonomicName>
must wait for fresh collections. Heuston Woods, Oxford,
<collectingRegion id="4992F843FFDDFF9942FBFB6E18FCFB0A" box="[902,961,1220,1245]" country="United States of America" name="Ohio" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">Ohio</collectingRegion>
, the
<typeStatus id="54ED8803FFDDFF994285FB6F1F15FB0A" box="[1016,1064,1221,1245]" pageId="11" pageNumber="270">type</typeStatus>
locality, is now a protected state park.
</paragraph>
</subSubSection>
</treatment>
</document>