Krobia xinguensis, a new species of cichlid fish from the Xingu River drainage in Brazil (Teleostei: Cichlidae)
Author
Kullander, Sven O.
text
Zootaxa
2012
3197
43
54
journal article
45401
10.5281/zenodo.214913
f3afc225-ba1a-4f79-b236-ca0328a801b1
1175-5326
214913
Krobia xinguensis
,
new species
Figs. 1–9
,
Tables 3–4
Holotype
.
INPA
35653. Adult male,
74.4 mm
SL
.
Brazil
, State of Pará,
Ilha
de Babaquara, rio Xingu,
03°12’43’’S
,
52°12’12’’W
.
5 Oct 1990
. L. Rapp Py-Daniel & J. Zuanon (
Fig. 1
).
FIGURE 1
.
Krobia xinguensis
, INPA 35653. Holotype, adult male, 74.4 mm SL. Brazil, State of Pará, Ilha de Babaquara, rio Xingu.
FIGURE 2.
Krobia xinguensis
, IRSNB 979. Paratype, female, 60.5 mm SL. Brazil, State of Mato Grosso, small igarapé tributary to Lago Upavi, Kamaiurá village, Posto Leonardo Vilas-Boas.
Paratypes
:
All from
Brazil
, rio Xingu drainage.
BMNH
1985.6.20:
1223–1242
pt. 1,
40.1 mm
SL
. Mato Grosso, córrego do Gato.
22 Apr 1968
. R.H. Lowe-McConnell. —
INPA
4219. 16,
35.3–77.2 mm
SL
;
NRM
61781. 3,
45.5–84.6 mm
SL
. Collected with
holotype
. —
IRSNB
877. 1,
67.7 mm
SL
. Mato Grosso, laguna at margin of rio Tuatuari upstream of Posto Leonardo Vilas-Boas.
12 Oct 1964
. J.-P. Gosse & Léopold III. —
IRSNB
878. 1,
47.1 mm
SL
. Mato Grosso, igarapé of Lago Yamarikumao, at Suiá village on rio Suiá-Missu.
3 Nov 1964
. J.-P. Gosse & Léopold III. —
IRSNB
879. 10,
38.6–60.5 mm
SL
. Mato Grosso, small igarapé tributary to Lago Upavi, Kamaiurá village, Posto Leonardo Vilas-Boas.
19 Oct 1964
. J.-P. Gosse & Léopold III. —
IRSNB
880. 1, 86.0 mm
SL
. Mato Grosso, laguna and inundated forest on right bank of rio Xingu upstream of Posto Diauarum.
15 Nov 1964
. J.-P. Gosse & Léopold III. —
USNM
235640. 2,
80.6–82.9 mm
SL
;
USNM
329625. 1,
50.8 mm
SL
. Mato Grosso, small tributary of rio Batovi.
Sep 1964
. H. Schultz.
Non-types:
NRM
60938–60939, 2,
65.8–76.1 mm
SL
. Aquarium specimens. E. Åhlander,
23 Jul 2010
.
Diagnosis.
Distinguished from other species of
Krobia
by slightly deeper caudal peduncle (17.6–19.6% SL, vs. 15.6–17.4 % in
K. itanyi
), dark lateral band reaching to end of dorsal-fin base (vs. ending well before in
K. itanyi
) (
Figs. 1–2
), two prominent dark interorbital stripes (vs. faint or obsolete in
K. itanyi
,
absent in
K. guianensis
) (
Fig. 3
), slightly curved suborbital stripe (vs. straight); presence of dark brown spot anterolaterally on each side of the lower jaw (vs. absence).
Description.
General aspect and colour pattern is illustrated in
Figs. 1–3
. Measurement data are summarised in
Table 3
. Sexes are very similar, with slightly shorter soft dorsal and soft anal fins, and pelvic fin in females.
TABLE 3
. Standard length (in millimeters) and proportional measurements in percents of standard length of
Krobia xinguensis
. SD, standard deviation. Holotype (INPA 35653) data given separately (HT), as well as included in pooled data. Regression line parameters, a (intercept), b (slope), and r (Pearson’s correlation coefficient) are calculated from measurements expressed in millimeters.
n |
HT |
Min |
Max |
Mean |
SD |
a |
b |
r |
Standard length (mm) |
22 |
74.4 |
38.6 |
84.6 |
59.2 |
14.2 |
Head length |
22 |
24.7 |
33.2 |
36.8 |
34.6 |
1.0 |
1.349 |
0.322 |
0.996 |
Snout length |
22 |
5.3 |
6.3 |
9.2 |
7.6 |
0.7 |
-1.055 |
0.095 |
0.972 |
Body depth |
22 |
37.1 |
45.2 |
53.3 |
48.6 |
2.4 |
-4.992 |
0.575 |
0.994 |
Orbit diameter |
22 |
10.1 |
12.6 |
16.0 |
14.1 |
1.0 |
2.115 |
0.103 |
0.979 |
Head width |
22 |
15.7 |
18.5 |
21.7 |
20.2 |
0.8 |
-1.024 |
0.220 |
0.991 |
Interorbital width |
22 |
9.9 |
9.7 |
14.1 |
11.8 |
1.3 |
-2.444 |
0.162 |
0.970 |
Preorbital depth |
22 |
5.0 |
4.2 |
7.6 |
6.0 |
1.1 |
-2.376 |
0.102 |
0.980 |
Caudal peduncle depth |
22 |
14.1 |
17.6 |
19.6 |
18.9 |
0.6 |
-0.772 |
0.203 |
0.995 |
Caudal peduncle length |
22 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
11.7 |
10.4 |
0.8 |
0.236 |
0.100 |
0.952 |
Pectoral-fin length |
22 |
27.9 |
32.4 |
40.3 |
36.1 |
2.2 |
-3.188 |
0.417 |
0.980 |
Pelvic-fin length |
22 |
29.3 |
29.3 |
44.4 |
35.7 |
3.5 |
-6.902 |
0.479 |
0.975 |
Last dorsal-fin spine length |
22 |
14.4 |
16.5 |
21.6 |
18.9 |
1.2 |
-2.243 |
0.229 |
0.982 |
Body deep and high, ovoid in profile. Head and snout short. Head and anterior half of trunk broad; trunk above anal-fin base and caudal peduncle strongly compressed. Predorsal contour steep, curved above orbits; spinous dorsal-fin base straight or slightly curved, soft dorsal-fin base strongly recurved. Predorsal contour commonly slightly steeper than prepelvic contour which may be straight or slightly curved. Orbit large, diameter greater than snout length, greater part in anterior half of head and slightly removed from interorbital contour. Mouth small; jaws isognathous; maxilla reaching to or almost to vertical from anterior margin of orbit; lower jaw articulation below middle of orbit. Lips thin, lower lip fold broadly interrupted symphysially. Caudal peduncle notably short and deep, incorporating last half centrum or last halfcentrum and part or all of preceding vertebra.
Jaw teeth similar in upper and lower jaw. Outer row of mostly blunt-tipped unicuspid, subcaniniform, erect, straight or slightly recurved, fixed or slightly movable, slightly increasing in size from posterior to symphyseal; symphyseal teeth about
0.6 mm
long in large specimens. Teeth in upper jaw left outer hemiseries 14–21, in lower jaw left outer hemiseries 14–20. Several (2–5, commonly 3) irregular rows of much smaller inner teeth in a band, short, slender, subcaniniform, slightly recumbent, straight or slightly recurved, slightly depressible, of about uniform size, or innermost slightly smaller.
FIGURE 3
. Facial view of
Krobia xinguensis
,
holotype, INPA 35653, 74.4 mm SL, to the left, to show transverse frontal stripes and, indicated by black arrows, anterolateral blotches on lower jaw close to lower lip; and
Krobia itanyi
, NRM 30357, 83.4 mm SL, to the right, showing considerably fainter transverse frontal stripes and absence of dark blotches on lower jaw.
FIGURE 4
.
Krobia xinguensis
. Occlusal view of lower pharyngeal toothplate, from NRM 61781, 72.6 mm SL.
Lower pharyngeal tooth plate (
Fig. 4
) short and wide (length 75% of width of tooth plate). Dentigerous area length 56 % of width of dentigerous area. Teeth in posterior row 19, along midline 6 or 7. Marginal teeth compressed, central and posteromedian teeth coarser; anterior pair with retrorse major cusp, remainder bicuspid with antrorse pointed posterior cusp and lower anterior bulge, except central teeth considerably worn, some with rounded tip. Marginal teeth short, teeth gradually longer caudad and mediad. Gill rakers short, well spaced, externally on first gill arch one epibranchial, one in angle, and 4 (17), 5 (5), 6 (1) ceratobranchial. Ceratohyal with a distinct lateral furrow for the hyoid artery; anterior ceratohyal posteriorly with a short indentation in the dorsal margin, immediately lateral to a short elevation from the lateral face. Supraneurals 2 (15). Vertebrae 12+13 (14), 13+13 (1).
Scales in E1 row 22 (5), 23 (18). Scales cycloid on cheek and gill cover. Predorsal and prepelvic scales cycloid or with a few marginal cteni. Cheek scales in three rows. Preopercular scales absent. Flank scales with narrow marginal band of cteni. Predorsal scales about as large as flank scales. Prepelvic scales slightly smaller than flank scales. Two horizontal rows of scales passing between pectoral and pelvic fins. Predorsal squamation anteriorly with a scale on each side of coronalis pore, followed by midline row of usually seven scales with slightly convex, truncate, or slightly concave posterior margin. Scales flanking first dorsal-fin spine may overlap anterior to the spine, or a small midline scale may be present immediately anterior to first dorsal-fin spine, commonly concealed by larger predorsal midline scale. Circumpeduncular scale rows 16 (7 above, 7 below lateral lines). Lateral lines separated by two horizontal scale rows. Lateral line scales 14/6 (2), 14/7 (1), 14/8 (2), 15/5 (1), 15/6 (1), 15/7 (1), 15/8 (8), 15/9 (1), 16/7 (5), 16/8 (1). One or two scales continuing lower lateral line on caudal-fin base. One canalbearing scale present basally on dorsal lobe in three specimens, positioned between rays D2-3 (1) or D3-4 (2); one or two canal-bearing scales present basally on ventral lobe in six specimens, between rays
V3–4
(1) or
V4–5
(5). Scales between upper lateral line and dorsal-fin base 3 anteriorly, 1 (occasionally 1.5) posteriorly. Usually 4–5 small scales along base of soft dorsal fin. Caudal fin with small scales proximally, covering approximately 1/3 of fin length.
Dorsal-fin rays XIV.8 (1), XIV.9 (14), XIV.10 (7), XIV.11 (1). First dorsal-fin spine short, spines increasing in length to fourth after which subequal in length, last two slightly longer. Soft dorsal fin pointed, fourth and fifth rays longest, reaching to middle or end of caudal fin. Anal-fin rays
III.7
(1),
III.8
(21). Soft anal fin similar to opposite dorsal fin, but reaching at most to 2/3 of caudal fin. Pectoral-fin rays 12 (6), 13 (16), 14 (1). Pectoral fin pointed, fourth ray longest, reaching to vertical from first or second anal-fin spine. Pelvic fin pointed, first ray longest, reaching to third anal fin spine or at most to base of third soft anal-fin ray. Caudal-fin rays ii.
i7
+
8i.
iii (2), iii.
i7
+
7i.
iii (12). Caudal fin rounded.
Colour pattern in preservative.
Ground colour whitish, pale greyish or pale brownish yellow, depending on preservation. Seven faint vertical bars, as counted from the posteriormost rostrad: (1) Bar 1 across caudal peduncle, (2) Bar 2 between ends of dorsal- and anal-fin bases, (3) Bar 3 between dorsal and anal fins above middle of analfin base, (4) Bars 4+5 between dorsal and anal fins above spinous anal fin, (5) Bar 6 across side above posterior part of abdomen, (6) Bar 7 from dorsum down to middle of side, below dorsal-fin spines 3-4 usually indistinctly delimited, (7) Bar 8 a broad blotch around beginning of dorsal fin and top of head. Dark brown lateral band starting from posterior margin of orbit, forming elongate blotch where crossing Bar 7, and continued usually with constrictions between bars and expansions where crossing bars, ending at end of dorsal-fin base. Bar 6 including a dark brown or blackish blotch, approximately round, about 1½ scale deep and 3 scales long; incorporated in lateral band, but more prominent than rest of band. Dark brown suborbital stripe from lower margin of orbit, slightly curved across cheek, ending ventrally on preopercle. Suborbital stripe may be faded on middle producing dark blotch below orbit and another on preopercle. Dark brown preorbital stripe from anteroventral margin of orbit across tip of snout. Two dark brown bands between opposite side orbits. Lower jaw anterolaterally on each side with dark brown blotch close to lower lip (
Fig. 3
). Lower sides with indistinct pattern of parallel light and dark horizontal stripes formed by slightly darker overlapping parts of scales and lighter scale centres. Dorsal fin pale brownish, posterior interradial membranes lighter, with several rows of dark spots. Dorsal-fin lappets dark brown with hyaline distal margin. Anal fin pale brownish, posterior interradial membranes lighter, with several rows of dark spots. Caudal fin pale brownish or hyaline, with indistinct pattern of rows of small dark spots dorsally or across all of fin. Over most of base of dorsal lobe of caudal fin a round or vertically oval dark brown blotch, margined by narrow whitish ring. Pelvic fin only slightly pigmented, outer rays brownish.
Live coloration (
Fig. 5
)
. Considerable information on live colours of
Krobia xinguensis
is available from images in ornamental fish literature (e.g.,
Stawikowski, 2007
). The major difference from preserved specimens consists in the rich orange to red or orange markings. Upper lip, lachrymal, part of cheek, anterior and posterior margins of opercle, and pectoral axilla red or orange. Bases of most flank scales marked with short red or orange vertical stripe.
FIGURE 5.
Krobia xinguensis
. Adult male in live coloration, NRM 60938, 76.1 mm SL; right side, reversed. Photograph by Erik Åhlander.
FIGURE 6
. Comparative morphometrics of species of
Krobia
. Caudal peduncle depth plotted against Standard Length.
FIGURE 7
. Comparative morphometrics of species of
Krobia
. Body depth plotted against Standard Length.
Comparative morphometrics.
In a comparison with
Krobia guianensis
and
K. itanyi
(
Tables 1–2
),
K. xinguensis
is distinguished by proportionally deeper caudal peduncle (
Fig. 6
), and averaging slightly deeper body (
Fig. 7
), shorter snout, and shorter caudal peduncle (
Tables 1–3
). The principal component analysis separates
K. xinguensis
mainly by caudal peduncle distances and body depth (
Table 4
,
Fig. 8
).
Distribution.
Known only from the Xingu river drainage, with several localities in headwaters in Mato Grosso and the
type
locality at the
Ilha
Babaquara, close to Altamira (
Fig. 9
). No detailed habitat information has been available for the samples included in the
type
series.
Lowe-McConnell (1991)
reported
Krobia xinguensis
as “Nov. gen. spec. cf.
Aequidens guianensis
”
from the córrego do Gato in the Suiá-Missu drainage, a clear water habitat including a stream, a pool, and a small lake, with abundant vegetation and aquatic invertebrates. It is the
type
locality of
Crenicichla rosemariae
Kullander (1997)
. A small rocky stream at São Felix on the middle rio Xingu was figured by
Stawikowski (2007)
as habitat of
K. xinguensis
.
Etymology.
The specific name
xinguensis
is an adjective referring to the river basin inhabited by the species.