Catalog of the Diptera types described by Camillo Rondani Author Sforzi, Alessandra 0000-0001-6974-7741 alessandra.sforzi@libero.it Author Sommaggio, Daniele 0000-0001-6974-7741 alessandra.sforzi@libero.it text Zootaxa 2021 2021-06-17 4989 1 1 438 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 1175-5326 4980621 89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 Anthomyia imbrida Rondani, 1866 ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1866a: 144 (key), 148 (description). TYPE LOCALITY: Rondani gave no type locality in his original description but presumably it is Italy because the work deals with Italian species . TYPE MATERIAL: 1 ♂ , lectotype ( MZUF : Box 25): Anthomyia Mgn / imbrida Rnd. , ♂ , Parma / 1368 / ♂ / lectotype ♂ , Anthomyia imbrida Rond., 1866 , desig. V. Michelsen , 1978 . PARALECTOTYPES EXAMINED: 3 ♂♂ ( MZUF : Box 25): Anthomyia Mgn / imbrida Rnd. , ♂ , Parma / 1368 / ♂ / paralectotype ♂ , Anthomyia imbrida Rond., 1866 , desig. V. Michelsen, 1978; 1 ♀ ( MZUF : Box 25): Anthomyia Mgn / imbrida Rnd. , ♀ , Parma / 1368 / ♀ / paralectotype ♀ , Anthomyia imbrida Rond., 1866 , desig. V. Michelsen, 1978 / = Anthomyia procellaris Rond. , ♀ , V. Michelsen det., 1978. PARALECTOTYPES NOT EXAMINED: 1 ♂ (in poor condition, missing head, right wing, both fore- and left mid-legs) (MSNC: Box DIPTERA Ex collezione Rondani - I): Anthomya procellaris R. 509 ♂ 2 Parma / Coll. Rondani, scatola n° 6, posiz. E-8 / Museo di Storia Naturale Università di Pisa, Calci (PI) ex collezione Rondani; 1 ♂ (in poor condition, only head, part of thorax and right wing remain) (MSNC: Box DIPTERA Ex collezione Rondani - I): Anthomya procellaris R. ♂ Parm. / Coll. Rondani, scatola n° 6, posiz. E-9 / Museo di Storia Naturale Università di Pisa, Calci (PI) ex collezione Rondani. CURRENT STATUS: valid species ( Dely-Draskovits 1993: 21 , Gorodkov et al. 1995: 5 ). REMARKS: Rondani (1866a: 148) described both sexes of Anthomyia imbrida from an unspecified number of specimens. Michelsen (1980a: 283) designated a lectotype ( ♂ ) and paralectotypes ( 2 ♂♂ , 1 ♀ ) without mentioning a fourth male, but labeling all of them as paralectotypes . We are unable to single out the two males designated as paralectotypes by Michelsen and consider the three males as paralectotypes . Michelsen (1980a: 283) did not mention an additional two males in the MSNC (both of these additional specimens are paralectotypes ).