Revision of Eudorylas Aczel, 1940 (Diptera, Pipunculidae) in the Middle East, with the description of four new species Author Motamedinia, Behnam Plant Protection Research Department, South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Birjand, Iran & Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, ON K 1 A 0 C 6, Ottawa, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-4030 bmoetamedi@yahoo.com Author Skevington, Jeffrey Hunter Carleton University, Biology Department, 207 Nesbitt Biology Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K 1 S 5 B 6, Ottawa, Canada & Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, ON K 1 A 0 C 6, Ottawa, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-9870 Author Kelso, Scott Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, ON K 1 A 0 C 6, Ottawa, Canada text Biodiversity Data Journal 2020 8 53609 53609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e53609 journal article http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e53609 1314-2828-8-e53609 616668E23F9C4652A41CDAB664204656 4568AC7B881D53E48A5F40589BE68AC4 Eudorylas jenkinsoni Coe, 1966 Diagnosis This species can be recognised by the size of the right surstylus in dorsal view, wider than long with inner finger-like projection; left surstylus triangular-shaped in dorsal view and dorsal margin of left surstylus humped in lateral view; gonopods small and equal in height; phallic guide short and straight with two triangular projection dorsomedially in lateral view (for illustration, see Kehlmaier, 2005: Fig. 31a, n). Distribution Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iran (Fig. 6 ), Italy, Japan, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland ( Kehlmaier 2005a , Motamedinia et al. 2017 , Skevington 2020 ). Notes DNA barcodes of Eudorylas jenkinsoni overlap with those of E. obliquus (0.62-1.63% pairwise divergence). The genitalia of these species differ by the size of the right surstylus in dorsal view, wider than long in E. jenkinsoni , so this is likely another case of recently-diverged species or ancestral hybridisation. There is always a possibility that it is a single species with polymorphic genitalia, so future genetic work is warranted.