Alburnus magnificus, a new species of bleak from the Orontes River drainage (Teleostei: Leuciscidae)
Author
Freyhof, Jörg
Author
Turan, Davut
text
Zootaxa
2019
2019-02-20
4559
2
373
383
journal article
27455
10.11646/zootaxa.4559.2.10
39a36038-a621-477e-97af-f4d214503b2e
1175-5326
2626928
804C91DE-17C9-4F2F-8454-530E8891DB5B
Alburnus magnificus
,
new species
(
Figure 2–4
)
Holotype
.
FFR 998, 76 mm SL;
Turkey
:
Kilis
prov: stream
Afrin
about
5 km
east of
Kocabeyli
, 36.806 36.982.
Paratypes
.
FFR 0 4672, 16,
35–65 mm
SL; same data as holotype.—
FFR
0 0 990, 86,
42–82 mm
SL;
Turkey
:
Hatay Province
:
stream Bedirge north east of
Akıncılar
, 36.371 36.1938—
FFR
0 4673, 2,
60–70 mm
SL;
Turkey
:
Gaziantep Province
:
stream Karasu at Tilmen Höyük 37.030 36.705.—
FSJF 2298
,
22
,
33–72
mm
SL;
Turkey
: Hatay
prov.: stream Büyük Karaçay at Karaçay, 36.1355 36.0422.—
FSJF 2412
,
21
,
41–78
mm
SL;
Turkey
: Hatay
prov.: stream Yıldırım at Serinyol, 36.3662 36.1811.—
FSJF 2915
,
14
,
47–78
mm
SL;
Turkey
:
Kilis
prov.: stream Afrin about
16 km
west of
Kilis
, 36.8133 36.9837.
Diagnosis.
Alburnus magnificus
is distinguished from
A. qalilus
(
Fig. 5
) by having its anal-fin origin below or behind the vertical through the last dorsal-fin ray (vs. below the 5
th
or 6
th
branched dorsal-fin ray), 4–5 scale rows between the lateral line and anal-fin origin (vs. 3), and a clear pattern of bold black or brown scales in live individuals (vs. fuzzy and usually blurred). The species are further distinguished by a minimum K2P distance of 1.8% in the COI sequence data (M. Geiger, pers. comm.; see
Geiger
et al
. 2014
for methods).
FIGURE 2
.
Alburnus magnificus
, holotype, FFR 998, female, 76 mm SL; Turkey; stream Afrin.
Alburnus magnificus
is sympatric—but not (as yet) syntopic—with
A
.
orontis
(
Fig. 6
) in the Orontes drainage. It is distinguished from
A. orontis
by having the ventral keel between the posterior end of the pelvic-fin base and anus exposed for 5–10 scales in front of the anus (vs. 0–2 scales), 9½–11½ branched anal-fin rays (vs. 12½–15½), 45–52 total lateral line scales (vs. 50–62) and 4–5 scale rows between the lateral line and anal-fin origin (vs. 5–7).
Alburnus magnificus
is distinguished from
A. baliki
(
Fig. 6
) by having well-developed pelvic axillary scales (vs. absence), 9½–11½ branched anal-fin rays (vs. 12½–14½) and well developed, overlapping scales on the back, flank and abdomen (vs. scales reduced, often not overlapping, absent on abdomen in front of pelvic-fin base). The new species is distinguished from
A
.
caeruleus
(
Fig. 6
) by lacking black pigments (vs. having numerous black pigments) on the distal margin of the dorsal and anal fins and having 9½–11½ branched anal–fin rays (vs. 13½– 17½).
Description.
See
Figures 2–4
for general appearance,
Table 1
for morphometric and
Table 2
for meristic data of the
holotype
and
30 paratypes
. Dorsal and ventral body profile slightly convex, ventral profile more convex than dorsal profile. Head long, its length 24–27% SL, its upper profile slightly convex with a convex interorbital region. Mouth oblique, lower jaw slightly projecting beyond upper jaw. Eye diameter about equal to interorbital distance. Caudal-peduncle depth 1.6–2.3 times in its length. Anal-fin origin below or behind vertical through last dorsal-fin ray. Axillary pelvic scales present. Keel between anus and pelvic-fin base exposed for 5–10 scales in front of anus. Maximum known size
82 mm
SL.
Dorsal fin with 3 simple and 7½ branched rays, outer margin straight. Anal fin with 3 simple and 9½–11½ branched rays, outer margin straight or concave. Pectoral fin with 1 simple and 13–16 branched rays, outer margin convex. Pelvic fin with 1 simple and 7 branched rays, outer margin slightly convex. Caudal-fin deeply forked, its lobes slightly pointed. Lateral line complete, reaching caudal-fin base, with 45–52 total lateral line scales. 8–11 scale rows between lateral line and dorsal-fin origin; 4–5 scale rows between lateral line and anal-fin origin. 9–12 short gill rakers on first gill arch. Pharyngeal teeth 1.4–4.1. Number of total vertebrae 38 (1), 39 (6) and 40 (3); predorsal vertebrae 14 (4), 15 (5) and 16 (1); abdominal vertebrae 20 (1), 21 (2) and 22 (7), caudal vertebrae 17 (5), 18 (4) and 19 (1). Vertebral formulae 20+19 (1), 21+17 (1), 21+18(1), 22+17 (4) or 22+18 (3).
Colouration.
In formalin-preserved fish, back and upper part of flank brown or dark-grey, lower part of flank and belly white or yellowish. In life, dorsal part of head and back brown, flank silvery with brown, grey or black pattern. An indistinct dark-grey inner axial stripe. Flank scales with small brown, black or dark-grey dots, some scales very densely pigmented forming a mottled pattern of brown, black or dark-grey scales organised in blotches or short rows. Pattern of brown, black or dark-grey scales irregularly set, often less dense on flank below lateral line, usually more dense on flank behind vertical of anal-fin origin. All fins hyaline, orange or with an orange central field and hyaline proximal and distal margins. Small black dots on fin rays usually present.
Sexual dimorphism.
Male with small tubercles on head.
Distribution
.
Alburnus magnificus
has only been recorded from the lower Orontes drainage in
Turkey
(
Fig. 1
) but is expected to be found also in adjacent
Syria
, most likely in the Afrin River drainage. Despite extensive fieldwork in the middle and upper Orontes in
Syria
by
Krupp (1985)
and JF, the species was not found and appears to be absent.
Alburnus magnificus
might inhabit smaller streams and tributaries in the Orontes drainage (
Fig. 7
), but its specific ecology and habitat preferences remain unclear.
Etymology.
Named
magnificus
for the magnificent colour of the species. An adjective.
FIGURE 3
.
Alburnus magnificus
, paratypes, FFR 990; from top: 75 mm SL, 74 mm SL, 73 mm SL; Turkey; stream Bedirge.
Discussion.
The two species of
Alburnus
in the Orontes are immediately distinguished by their branched analfin ray counts.
Krupp (1992)
identified the species with 12½–15½ branched anal-fin rays as
A. orontis
(vs. 9½–11½ in
A. qalilus
) and we follow that conclusion.
Krupp (1992)
counted the last two anal-fin rays, which are based on a single pterygophore, as 1 ray and not 1½ rays as here. This character state has also been described by
Sauvage (1882)
, who gives 16 anal-fin rays in his description of
A. orontis
. Based on
Sauvage’s (1882)
descriptions of species with a very stable number of anal-fin rays (as
Barbus
), it is clear that he counted the unbranched and branched fin rays together and counted the last 1½ rays as 1 ray.
Alburnus orontis
has 3 unbranched and 12½–15½ branched rays, thus 15–18 rays in total versus
12–14 in
A. qalilus
following the methodology applied by
Sauvage (1882)
, clearly demonstrating that
Krupp (1992)
identified
A. orontis
correctly.
TABLE 1.
Morphometric data of
Alburnus magnificus
(holotype: FFR 998, paratypes: FFR 4672, n=10; FFR 990, n=20). Calculations include the holotype.
holotype |
paratypes |
In percent of standard length |
range |
mean |
SD |
Head length |
26.9 |
24.1–26.9 |
25.2 |
0.6 |
Body depth at dorsal–fin origin |
26.3 |
24.0–28.3 |
25.4 |
1.0 |
Predorsal length |
57.3 |
53.6–58.0 |
55.3 |
1.2 |
Prepelvic length |
51.0 |
46.9–51.0 |
48.4 |
1.0 |
Preanal length |
70.6 |
65.7 –70.6 |
67.7 |
1.2 |
Distance between pectoral and anal–fin origins |
45.1 |
42.0–47.1 |
44.1 |
1.2 |
Distance between pectoral and pelvic–fin origins |
24.4 |
22.8–25.6 |
24.2 |
0.8 |
Distance between pelvic and anal–fin origins |
21.4 |
18.3–21.8 |
20.2 |
0.7 |
Depth of caudal peduncle |
11.6 |
9.9–12.2 |
11.0 |
0.6 |
Length of caudal peduncle |
22.7 |
18.8–23.1 |
21.3 |
1.2 |
Dorsal–fin length |
21.7 |
18.8–23.0 |
20.9 |
1.1 |
Pectoral–fin length |
20.8 |
19.2–21.9 |
20.5 |
0.8 |
Pelvic–fin length |
16.5 |
14.6–16.7 |
15.5 |
0.6 |
Anal–fin length |
17.1 |
15.5–17.6 |
16.6 |
0.6 |
Upper caudal fin length |
24.5 |
23.4–26.5 |
24.5 |
0.8 |
Head width at eye |
12.1 |
11.2–12.9 |
11.9 |
1.4 |
Head width at nape |
14.2 |
12.7–14.2 |
13.5 |
0.5 |
Head depth at eye |
14.1 |
13.1–15.0 |
13.8 |
0.5 |
Head depth at nape |
19.2 |
16.9–19.2 |
18.1 |
0.6 |
Snout length |
7.7 |
7.3–8.9 |
7.7 |
0.4 |
Eye diameter |
7.1 |
6.4–7.9 |
7.0 |
0.4 |
Postorbital distance |
13.3 |
11.3–13.3 |
12.1 |
0.5 |
Interorbital distance |
8.9 |
7.5–9.2 |
8.1 |
0.4 |
Mouth width |
6.4 |
5.7–6.8 |
6.3 |
0.3 |
Krupp (1992)
mentions two individuals of
Alburnus sellal
(MNHN A.3903) from the Orontes at
Hamah
in
Syria
collected by E. Chantre in 1881. Despite intensive fieldwork in the Orontes drainage in
Syria
and
Turkey
,
A. sellal
was never found there. The same is true for
Cyprinion macrostomum
(Cyprinidae)
(MNHN 1880:1000), which was also uniquely recorded from the Orontes by E. Chantre, but otherwise has been found exclusively in the Persian Gulf basin. Both species are ubiquitous inhabitants of natural and modified rivers, streams and lakes and are generally resistant to human impacts on biodiversity, hence it is difficult to imagine that they have been extirpated from the Orontes drainage. We are therefore confident that neither species has ever occurred in the Orontes drainage and the early records constitute labelling errors in E. Chantres’ MNHN collection.
Alburnus magnificus
is distinguished from
A
.
sellal
,
A
.
heckeli
,
A. kurui
,
A. kotschyi
,
A
.
tarichi
and
A
.
timarensis
by presence of a pattern of irregularly set and shaped grey, dark-brown or black blotches on a silvery or brown body background (vs. absence).
Alburnus magnificus
additionally differs from
A
.
sellal
,
A
.
heckeli
,
A. kotschyi
,
A
.
timarensis
and
A
.
kurui
by absence of a dark-grey lateral epidermal stripe (vs. presence). In
A. magnificus
, there is an indistinct inner axial stripe in preserved individuals, but this is invisible in live fish.
Alburnus magnificus
has fewer total vertebrae than
A
.
sellal
,
A
.
heckeli
,
A
.
tarichi
,
A
.
timarensis
and
A. kotschyi
(38–40, vs. 41–45) and is further distinguished from
A
.
sellal
,
A
.
heckeli
,
A
.
tarichi
and
A
.
timarensis
by having fewer lateral line scales (45–52, vs.
66–82 in
A
.
sellal
,
77–93 in
A
.
heckeli
,
70–93 in
A. tarichi
,
54–72 in
A. timarensis
), fewer scale rows between the dorsal-fin origin and lateral line (8–11, vs.
11–16 in
A
.
sellal
,
13–15 in
A
.
heckeli
,
11–15 in
A. tarichi
,
10–13 in
A. timarensis
) and fewer scale rows between the anal-fin origin and lateral line (4–5, vs.
5–7 in
A
.
sellal
,
5–8 in
A
.
heckeli
,
5–8 in
A. tarichi
).