Review Of The Anotylus Cimicoides Species Group (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae) Author Makranczy, György text Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2017 2017-06-19 63 2 143 262 http://dx.doi.org/10.17109/azh.63.2.143.2017 journal article 10.17109/AZH.63.2.143.2017 2064-2474 12625425 671ADB82-5AA9-418A-BB5C-DB3B912D3BD2 Anotylus hartmanni sp. n. ( Figs 82 , 132–138 , 267 ) Typematerial – Holotype (m): NEPAL : ManasluMts., SE-slope, WGupchiDanda, 2200–2300 m [ 28°08‘37“N , 84°44‘42“E ], 28.V.2006 , leg. J. Schmidt , sifting leaf litter in for- estremainsalongmountaincrest ( NKME ) ; Paratypes (41): samedataasholotype ( 1 m , NHMW ) ; ManasluMts., DudhPokhariLekh, belowHelamPokhari, 2000 m [ 28°11‘N , 84°34‘E ], 22.IV.2003 , leg. J. Schmidt , sifting forest litter ( 2 m , 3 f, 22, NKME, 1, MNHP , 1, ZMUC , 1, ISNB , 1, NMPC , 1, CNCI , 1, FMNH , 1, AMNH , 1, MHNG , 1, SDEI , 1, SMNS , 1, NIBR , 1 m , BMNH , 1 m , HNHM ) ; NEPAL : Manaslu Mts. , Dudh Pokhari Lekh , upper Phulinagiri , Madi , 2500 m [abovePhulingiriMadi, 28°13‘N , 84°34‘E ], 19-21.IV.2003 , leg. J. Schmidt , siftingforestlitter (1, NKME ) . Description – Measurements (in mm, n=10): HW = 0.63 (0.60–0.65); TW = 0.65 (0.61– 0.68); PW = 0.90 (0.85–0.97); EW = 0.90 (0.84–0.95); AW = 0.97 (0.90–1.03); HL = 0.48 (0.45– 0.51); EL = 0.11 (0.10–0.12); TL = 0.21 (0.20–0.23); PL = 0.57 (0.53–0.60); SC = 0.48 (0.45–0.50); FB = 1.58 (1.49–1.65); BL = 3.30 (2.61–3.50). Habitus as in Fig. 82 . Forebody moderately shiningdespitesculpture, abdomenwithfaintcoriaceousmicrosculpture, shallowlypunc- tured, aslustrousasforebody. Bodyreddishdarkbrownexceptabdomen, anteriormargin ofhead, lateralmarginofpronotum, antennaeandmouthpartsmediumtodarkbrown. Headwithanteriormargintruncateinmiddle, obliquetosupraantennaltubercles (asmod- eratelyelevatedobliqueridges) wheregentlyangled (broadlyrounded) again, possessing slightrim, discslightlyimpressedneareyes. Epistomalsutureformingsubcircularimpression (lesspuncturedinside), uppersurfacewithouttactilesetae, eyessmallandrather flat; indorsalviewtemples (1.9× lengthofeye) alatiform, laterallybulgingandrounded, posteriorlyconstrictedtoformdistinctneck, however, dorsalsidenotseparatedbyoccipi- talfurrow, ratherbydorsumofneckbearingmicrosculptureinsteadofpunctation. Anten- nomere 1 flattenedclub-shapedandsmooth, segment 2 basallybroadovoid, segment 3 club-shaped, segment 4 smallandisodiametrical, segments 5–11 withbasaldishes, articles 6–10 slightlytransverse (about 1.4× broaderthanlong). Headandpronotumwithmostly lacunosesculpture. Pronotumwithlateralportionexplanateandslightlyup-turned, edge withafewshortsetae, lateralborderratherevenlyarched, withanumberofsmall, irregularlydistributedtubercles, posteriormarginincisedbeforecorners; discmediallyrather convex, withtwoposteriorlyconfluentlongitudinalridges, impressedalongsidethem, laterallyimpressednearsidemargins. Elytrawithmembranousposteriormarginextendingfromsuturalcornertolateral 5/6 ofhindmargin, asmallincision- likethinningbefore outercorner. Elytralepipleuralridgepresentwithup-turnedlateralalatiformportions, discdepressed; shouldersmoderatelydeveloped, surfacefoveolate, inbetweenpunctures torulose. Legsshort, pro-andmesotibiawithseveralspinuloserows, metatibiawithlon- gitudinalctenidiumofspinulesindistalhalf. Abdomenwithsidesweaklyarcuate, second segmentwithparatergitesstronglybroadeningposteriorly (abdomenappearingconstrict- edatbase), thoseofsegmentsIII–VIIthin, mesalparatergitesbroad. Posterioredgeof tergiteVIIwiththinpalisadefringe, medianpartofsterniteVIIasinFig. 132 , sterniteVIII ( Fig. 133 ), tergitesIX ( Fig. 134 ), X ( Fig. 135 ) andaedeagusasinFigs 136–138 , spermatheca asinFig. 267 . Figs 132–138. Anotylus hartmanni sp. n. , male. 132 = median part of sternite VII, 133 = ster- nite VIII, 134 = tergite IX, 135 = tergite X, 136 = aedeagus, frontal view, 137 = median lobe, lateral view, 138 = paramere, lateral view. Scales: 0.10 mm for Figs 136–138, 0.125 mm for Figs 134–135, 0.14 mm for Figs 132–133 Etymology – ThespeciesisnamedafterMatthiasHartmann (NKME), whocontributedsignificantlytothebetterknowledgeofthefaunaoftheHimalayas, particularlyNepal. Distribution – OnlyknownfromtheManaslumountainrangeinWestern Nepal . Remarks – Habitatnotesfromthecollector (JoachimSchmidt) forthe 40 paratypescollectedin 2003: Forestremnantsneartemporarystreams; species richforestsonbothcollectingsites, mainlyevergreentreesandshrubs, but markedlyinfluencedbytreecuttingandcow/yak/sheep/goatgrazing.