Predatory midges of the genus Schizohelea Kieffer, 1917 in Europe and North Africa (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) Author Szadziewski, Ryszard Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80 - 308 Gdańsk, Poland Author Dominiak, Patrycja TromsØ University Museum, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, NO- 9037 TromsØ, Norway Author Rumišek, Mario Division of Zoology, Faculty of Science, HR- 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Author Neinhuis, Christoph Chair of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany Author Wanke, Stefan Chair of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany & Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany & Abteilung Botanik und molekulare Evolutionsforschung, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Author Rupp, Thomas Department of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria text Zootaxa 2024 2024-09-26 5514 2 169 187 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5514.2.5 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.5514.2.5 1175-5326 13849728 B20A1F98-0B55-48DF-AD7F-EA4339591E32 Genus Schizohelea Kieffer, 1917 Schizohelea Kieffer, 1917: 295 . Type species Ceratopogon copiosus Winnertz, 1852 (= Ceratopogon leucopeza Meigen, 1804 ); Wirth & Grogan 1988: 78 (diagnosis, synonymy); Szadziewski et al. 2022: 7 (notes on diagnosis, fossil species). Kiefferomyia Mayer, 1937: 303 . Type species Kiefferomyia gorana Mayer, 1937 (= Ceratopogon leucopeza Meigen, 1804 ). Diagnosis . Moderately large midges with black, shiny body (tarsi slightly lighter) and plane, hyaline wings. Frons and vertex separated by fused eyes in both sexes, narrowly in male, broadly in female ( Fig. 1c ); eyes in both sexes with more or less distinct microtrichia between ommatidia covering the whole surface or restricted to median part only. Female mandible armed with 9–12 strong retrorse teeth. Flagellum without sensilla coeloconica, all 13 flagellomeres separated ( Figs. 1b , 11a ). Female flagellum with distal 5 flagellomeres slightly longer than preceding ones ( Fig. 1b ), antennal ratio AR about 1.0. Male flagellum with 3 distal flagellomeres elongated and with well-developed plume ( Figs. 1a , 11a ). Palpus with 5 segments, palpomere 3 without sensory pit ( Figs. 1d–e , 11b–c ). Paratergite small, anterior anepisternum large, anepisternal cleft narrow ( Fig. 1f ). Wing membrane without macrotrichia except for females of S. incerta ( Clastrier, 1963 ) ( Fig. 4c ), both first radial cells present, vein M 2 broadly interrupted at base ( Figs. 1g –h ). Legs slender to slightly stout, hind femur usually stout, unarmed except for male S. armata ( Remm, 1993 ) bearing ventral spines on hind femur ( Fig. 11d ). Tarsomeres 4 subcylindrical to cylindrical. Tarsomere 5 of hind leg with ventral swelling at base in female ( Fig. 2e ), without swelling in male. Fore and mid claws of female short, equal, each with basal inner tooth, hind claw of female single with long basal tooth ( Figs. 2e–f , 11e ); claws of all legs in male short. In male genitalia sternite 9 slightly excavated, tergite 9 short, narrowing distally, gonocoxite with strong 2–3 lobed lateroventral expansion or tubercle at base; gonostylus usually slender, Ccurved, shorter to longer than gonocoxite with proportions 0.7–1.3. Parameres rodlike, separate, with apex bearing a pointed projection and usually a hyaline flap. Aedeagus arched, simple or with two submedian apical projections; dentate ventral plate present in S. incerta and S. clastrieri Szadziewski, Dominiak, Rumišek et Rupp , sp. nov. ( Fig. 5h ). Female abdominal sternite 9 separated medially, with forked or single arms ( Figs. 3e , 11g ), underneath sternite 8 usually well visible internal sclerites of unknown origin ( Fig. 3f ). Two small functional spermathecae with slender necks present, rudimentary spermatheca sometimes well developed ( Figs. 2h , 4h , 11f ). Comments . Females of the genus are morphologically very similar to each other and cannot be identified with certainty. For example, the shape of single arms of female sternite 9 can vary between specimens. Despite their mandibles being armed with strong teeth, Schizohelea females have never been observed preying on other insects. It is possible that they are facultative predators and feed mostly on flowers (see comments under species).