Venation pattern and revision of Orthoptera sensu nov. and sister groups. Phylogeny of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Orthoptera sensu nov. Author Béthoux, Olivier Author Nel, André text Zootaxa 2002 96 1 88 journal article 10.5281/zenodo.156112 f86b2225-fd69-4d14-888f-1656863a3244 1175­5326 156112 Genus Gerarus Scudder, 1885 . Type species. Gerarus vetus Scudder, 1885 . Composition. We restrict the genus to the species Gerarus vetus Scudder, 1885 , Gerarus bruesi Meunier, 1909 , Gerarus fisheri ( Brongniart, 1885 ) Burnham, 1983 , G erarus collaris Handlirsch, 1906 , and Gerarus danielsi Handlirsch, 1906 (see above). Diagnosis. Burnham ( 1983 ) compared Gerarus to Nacekomia , Progenentomum , Genentomum and Gerarulus . Kukalová­Peck & Brauckmann ( 1992 ) did not give a new diagnosis of the genus. Thus we propose a new diagnosis, based on forewings characters: ScP long, straight, anteriorly pectinate; branches of ScP simple or shortly ramified; RP with few distal branches; MA differentiated into MA 1 and MA 2 ; MA 1 generally connected to RP by a short cross­vein or shortly fused; MP ramified very proximally; CuPa present, more or less weak; CuPb ramified with an anterior branch long or reduced, and either connected or not to CuPa. Note. The very long, spiny pronotum of numerous Gerarus spp. is a strong synapomorphy ( Burnham 1983 ; Kukalová­Peck & Brauckmann 1992 ) but is unknown in Gerarus bruesi , thus it is not possible to determine if it is at the family or genus level. Discussion. Gerarus vetus as figured by Kukalová­Peck & Brauckmann ( 1992 : figs. 4,10,13) has a simple MP, suggesting closer relationships with Orthoptera than with G. bruesi and G. danielsi , which have an MP which is clearly and very proximally ramified. In his composite reconstruction of the holotype of G. vetus , Burnham ( 1983 : fig. 4 ) did not figure a simple but a forked MP vein. It is not certain if the holotype of G. vetus and the specimens studied by Kukalová­Peck & Brauckmann ( 1992 ) belong to the same species or even genus. Thus, the monophyly of this genus remains unclear.