Revision of the spider genus Mystaria Simon, 1895 (Araneae: Thomisidae) and the description of a new genus from the Afrotropical region Author Honiball Lewis, Allet S. Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 South Africa ahoniball@gmail.com Author Dippenaar-Schoeman, Ansie S. Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 South Africa & ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute, P / Bag X 134, Queenswood, 0121 South Africa text Zootaxa 2014 2014-10-15 3873 2 101 144 journal article 5298 10.11646/zootaxa.3873.2.1 1053c042-2d20-480a-b084-05eda83a77a4 1175-5326 4948115 AC318953-2804-4BBB-B885-27A8F1DB1EAB Genus Leroya gen. n. Type species: Leroya silva sp. n. Etymology. Named after John and Astri Leroy, John, who sampled a specimen of L. unicolor at the age of six when accompanying Dr. Sedel during an expedition in the then Belgian Congo , now the Democratic Republic of Congo ( DRC ). Diagnosis. Carapace with granular texture; dorsally planar, uniformly dark in colour ( Figs 133, 135, 137 ); sturdier and larger than in Mystaria ; AME situated very close to clypeal edge, lateral eyes large, situated on carapace lateral edge and on small tubercles; clypeal length very short, much shorter than MOQ (in contrast to Mystaria ), ( Figs 139, 140 ). Chelicerae with retromargin smooth and without cheliceral teeth or appendages. Anterior legs stronger than in Mystaria , posterior legs pale with dark band over distal part of femur and partly on patella ( Figs 133, 135, 137 ), leg colour is genus specific, varies from variable leg colouration in Mystaria ; Female epigyne darkly sclerotised ( Figs 136, 138 ), intromittent canals curve and open into large kidney-shaped spermathecae from behind ( Figs. 143, 145 ), in contrast to numerous very long complex coils opening into small round spermathecae in Mystaria . Male bulb with large swollen tegulum ( Figs 134 , 142 ), embolus thickened and sclerotised in contrast to long thin coiling embolus in Mystaria ; RTA originate well below VTA, long, rigid with sharp tip curving antero-laterally ( Figs 134 , 141 ). Description. Body length 3.04–3.92 in males, 3.46–5.21 in females. Colour . Carapace a shiny-metallic copper-red to darker copper-brown or black in females; darker and shiny metallic copper to dark turquoise in males; abdomen pale brown or darker blue-green (turquoise); leg I–II similar colour as carapace, with leg III–IV femora distally, patellae proximally, metatarsi and tarsi red to dark copperbrown, remaining leg segments pale white sometimes with a faint brown line laterally on both sides of tibiae III–IV; palp with femur and tarsus brown, tibia paler with longitudinal brown stripe dorsally. Carapace . Without coloured patterns or marks; slightly elevated in thoracic area; steeply sloping anteriorly and posteriorly; with dense, short setae; long, erectile setae on postero-thoracic edge, laterally on carapace and/or on lateral eye area. Clypeus . Vertical, long, erectile setae on edge. Chelicerae. Obtuse, fairly small, broadened at base narrowing to tip with long serrated setae on promargin ( Fig. 128 ). Mouth parts . Labium cube-shaped to oval, endites indented with few scopula hairs. Sternum . Heart-shaped covered with fine setae. Palp . With single dentated claw; setae on all segments. Eyes . Both eye rows re-curved, AER=PER; ALE>AME; AME closest to each other; PLE>PME; MOQ eye area wider than long, narrower in front; PME nearer to lateral eyes than to each other; LE large, usually sessile sometimes with a black spot; situated laterally on edge of carapace. Legs . Medium to long; leg segments densely covered with short setae; spiniform setae present dorsally on femora, patellae, tibiae of leg I–IV and ventrally of tibiae III–IV; shorter spiniform setae present ventrally and/or laterally or distally on tibiae and metatarsi I–IV; scopula hairs present ventrally on metatarsi and tarsi I–IV, denser on legs III–IV; trichobothria dorsally in single rows on tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi I–IV; tarsal claws and tufts both at a sharp angle from tarsi, differ as follows from Sylligma ( Figs 150–153 ), tufts not presented at an angle, and from Mystaria ( Figs 91-114 ) in which claws have a thicker base with modified claws, whereas Leroya has uniform claws and an even base ( Figs 129-132 ); claw base curved with claws of legs I-II with>8 teeth and legs III-IV <8 teeth. Abdomen . Round with numerous setae; five sigillae present dorsally, grouped in an arrow-shape formation; ventrally with stria. Spinnerets . Small, conical, anterior pair largest, median pair smallest. Epigyne . Without rim or atrium ( Figs 136, 138 ); intromittent orifices as in Figs 144, 146 . Palp . Bulb heavily sclerotised; embolus of medium-length ( Figs 134 , 141 ); RTA shorter than VTA; VTA with curve, thickened tip ( Fig. 142 ). Natural history. Members of the genus Leroya gen. n. have been sampled from rain forests and primary canopy forests by hand or fogging. Distribution. This genus is endemic to the Afrotropical region, known from very few localities in the Democratic Republic of Congo ( DRC ), Cote d’ Ivoire, Rwanda and Uganda ( Figs 147, 148 ). Remarks. Simon (1895) diagnosed the genus Mystaria based on its carapace shape, variation in eye size and distance, cheliceral spinules, labium and leg characters. In the present revision, it is revealed that the species M. unicolor was wrongly placed in this genus and that a number of new characters such as sexual dimorphic characters, smooth cheliceral margins, eye arrangement, PME size, clypeal length, leg and body colour warrant the species to be placed into its own genus.