Tretogonia Melichar (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Proconiini): two new species from South Brazil and a redescription of T. dentalis Emmrich, 1988 Author Mejdalani, Gabriel DE1C60FA-FB28-4F73-B316-18E901D5783D Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. mejdalan@acd.ufrj.br Author Domahovski, Alexandre C. 0B988BD5-599B-42CE-ADCB-50FC813E104E Departamento de Zoologia, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531 - 980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. domahovskiac@yahoo.com.br Author Rendón-Mera, Diana I. A4349B08-D9E1-42D7-AB02-507A6DC1D051 Departamento de Zoologia, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531 - 980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. direndonm@gmail.com Author Cavichioli, Rodney R. 58DD5B1D-2A8E-4504-B427-6A6E18E87498 Departamento de Zoologia, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531 - 980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. cavich@ufpr.br text European Journal of Taxonomy 2019 2019-04-09 513 1 14 journal article 10.5852/ejt.2019.513 ccffc43d-6b4a-4b1e-ab57-3a2ff311bde1 2118-9773 2634501 D4A665FE-4F4C-4BF8-8491-81CF086FAE8E Tretogonia diminuta sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 14DBD866-B599-4EBF-945B-5DD990BB4A7C Figs 1–9 Diagnosis Body short and robust ( Figs 1–2 ) in comparison to other species of the genus; in dorsal view, head triangular ( Fig. 1 ); pygofer with process serrated apically ( Fig. 5 ); aedeagus with distinct dorsoapical lobe ( Fig. 8 ). Etymology The specific epithet, ʻ diminuta ʼ, refers to the small body size, this being the smallest species of the genus. Material examined Holotype BRAZIL • ♂ ; “S. [ São ] J. [ José ] [dos] PINHAIS PR [State of Paraná ] / Brasil II-1982 / CAVICHIOLI Leg”; DZUP 215385 . Type locality São José dos Pinhais, Paraná , South Brazil . Measurement Body length: holotype ( ♂ ) 8.2 mm . Description Male COLORATION. General coloration ( Figs 1−3 ) brown. Frons and clypeus yellowish-brown; lorum darker and gena pale yellow. Pronotum with anterior and posterior margins dark brown. Scutellum pale yellow. Forewing with lighter area along costal margin from base to approximately level of apex of clavus; membrane area translucent. Foreleg mostly reddish-brown; middle and hind legs mostly pale brown with darker areas. STRUCTURE. Head in dorsal view ( Figs 1−3 ): well produced anteriorly, triangular, median length of crown slightly more than ½ of interocular width and almost 3/10 of transocular width; without carina at transition from crown to face; ocelli located slightly before imaginary line between anterior eye angles, each ocellus approximately equidistant between midline of crown and adjacent anterior eye angle; frontogenal suture extending onto crown and almost attaining ocellus; coronal suture distinct basally. Antennal ledge slightly protuberant; in lateral view ( Fig. 2 ), distinctly bicarinate with surface between dorsal and ventral carinae depressed. Frons ( Figs 2−3 ) convex with distinct muscle impressions; texture of central portion granular; epistomal suture obsolete medially; clypeus laterally with basal protuberance; apex rounded. Thorax ( Figs 1–2 ) with pronotal width, between humeri, smaller than transocular width of head; pronotum elongate, attaining scutoscutellar suture; disk, except on anterior portion, with numerous large deep pits, without pubescence. Mesonotum with scutellum slightly transversely striate. Forewing ( Figs 1–2 ) with texture of clavus and corium coriaceous and coarsely pitted; four apical cells, base of fourth more proximal than base of third. Hind wing with vein R2+3 incomplete. Hind leg with femoral setal formula 2+1+1 or 2+1; knee almost attaining posterior margin of lateral pronotal lobe; first tarsomere with many small setae on plantar surface. TERMINALIA. Pygofer ( Fig. 4 ) moderately produced posteriorly; broadly rounded distally; with few macrosetae and dispersed microsetae; ventral margin ( Fig. 5 ) with process near half-length, curving inwards and serrated apically. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 6 ) not fused to its counterpart; triangular; with numerous dispersed microsetae and few macrosetae near apex; dorsal surface with small tooth at apical third; plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Style ( Fig. 7 ) elongate, almost attaining tooth of plate; apophysis with apical portion extremely expanded and forming pair of lateral teeth. Connective ( Fig. 7 ) Y-shaped; very short; stalk without median dorsal keel. Aedeagus symmetrical; shaft ( Fig. 8 ) short; curved basally upwards and then strongly curved posteriorad; dorsal margin notched near apex; apical margin emarginated, forming dorsal lobe; in ventral view ( Fig. 9 ), shaft expanded on distal half, constricted preapically and with pair of preapical short acute processes directed anteriorad. Figs 1–9. Tretogonia diminuta sp. nov. , holotype, ♂ (DZUP 215385). 1 . Body, dorsal view. 2 . Body, lateral view. 3 . Face, frontal view. 4 . Pygofer, lateral view. 5 . Pygofer, dorsal view. 6 . Valve and subgenital plate, ventral view. 7 . Connective and style, dorsal view. 8 . Aedeagus and basal segment of anal tube, lateral view. 9 . Aedeagus, ventral view. Scales in mm. Female Unknown. Remarks Tretogonia diminuta sp. nov. can be distinguished from the other species of the genus by the combination of features provided in the diagnosis. The triangular head is useful for distinguishing T. diminuta sp. nov. from the three species of the genus that are only known from females ( T. albicans , T. conspicua and T. lateritia ). In Young’s monograph, the new species keys to couplet six due to the absence of basal aedeagal processes ( Young 1968 ). This couplet establishes the distinction between T. cinerea and three species positioned at couplets seven and eight ( T. punctatissima , T. costalimai and T. tomentosa ); in T. cinerea the aedeagus has a pair of minute processes located on the basal half of the shaft ( Young 1968 ) instead of the preapical processes of T. diminuta , whereas in T. punctatissima , T. costalimai and T. tomentosa it has no processes ( Young 1968 ).