Notes on the genera Peritropisca Carvalho & Lorenzato and Rewafulvius Carvalho (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae), with the description of a new species of Peritropisca from Indonesia Author Wolski, Andrzej Author Gorczyca, Jacek text Zootaxa 2014 3753 2 155 166 journal article 46754 10.11646/zootaxa.3753.2.5 dada10eb-d22a-4a30-a10a-9f1bc741f935 1175-5326 228110 57C228FB-554A-4A34-8957-14DF84616CDA Rewafulvius Carvalho, 1972 (Figures 5–10, 31, 31–34) Rewafulvius Carvalho 1972 : 53 (gen. nov.); Carvalho & Froeschner 1987 : 134 (list); Schuh 1995: 35 (catalog); Gorczyca 2000 : 49 (list), 2006: 66 (catalog), 2002–2013 online (online catalog) (catalog). Type species: Rewafulvius brachypterus Carvalho, 1972 (original designation). Euchilofulviella Gorczyca 1999 : 3 , 9 (gen. nov.); Gorczyca 2000 : 49 (list), 2006: 30 (catalog); Schuh 2002-2013 (online catalog). Type species: Euchilofulviella ernsti Gorczyca, 1999 (original designation) syn . nov . Diagnosis . Recognized by the following set of features: strong brachyptery in both sexes (Figs. 5–8); macropterous forms with hemelytron somewhat narrowed at basal one fourth (Figs. 7–8); endosoma membranous, with large, bifurcated, medial sclerite ( Fig. 31 ); left paramere with apical process strongly protruding from paramere body, with distinct tooth situated on medial portion of dorsal surface; sensory lobe somewhat convex, covered with few long, protruding, bristlelike setae ( Figs. 32–33 ); Redescription . Brachypterous male . STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND VESTITURE (Figs. 5, 9). Dorsum covered with relatively dense, fine, scalelike, almost reclining setae weakly broadened toward apex. Head . Elongated horizontally, conical, weakly rugose (Fig. 5); eye small, reaching gula (Fig. 9); vertex and frons just slightly convex; vertex without occipital carina; antennal segment I cylindrical, mixed with moderately distributed, reclining setae and with few, protruding setae; segment II slightly thickened toward apex, covered with moderately dense, semirecumbent setae; segments III and IV thin, covered with relatively sparse, almost protruding setae; labium thin, with apex somewhat reaching beyond metacoxae; segment I divided medially. Thorax . Pronotum . Subquadrate, weakly rugose, except for relatively strongly wrinkled posterior portion of pronotal calli, humeral angles and their surrounding area; collar well developed and separated from remainder of pronotum; calli convex, occupying almost entirely surface of pronotum sloping to posterior margin, except humeral angles and small area contiguous with humeral angles (Fig. 5). Mesoscutum and scutellum . Scutellum somewhat rugose, mostly flattened with just slightly convex, longitudinal, medial elevation originating from base to apex (Fig. 5). Thoracic pleura . Almost without setae; proepisternum and proepimeron shiny; remaining pleura weakly rugose; scent gland efferent system weakly developed, reduced to posterior margin of metepisternum. Hemelytron . Rounded laterally; dorsal surface with sculpturation based on very small tubercles forming very small, numerous rounded structures (as on Fig. 31 ); cuneus not separated from remainder of hemelytron by costal fracture; membrane just slightly developed, inner margin weakly overlapping other membrane (Fig. 5). Legs . Relatively long; tarsus bisegmented; tarsomere II not subdivided; pretarsal claw toothed subapically. Macropterous male. STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND VESTITURE (Figs. 7, 10, 31). Dorsum, thoracic pleura, legs as in brachypterous male. Thorax . Pronotum . Trapezoidal. Hemelytron . Lateral margin somewhat constricted at basal one fourth, remainder of lateral margin very weakly rounded; costal fracture present; membrane well developed; major cell relatively small, almost rectangular; minor cell small (Fig. 7). Male genitalia . Aedeagus ( Fig. 31 ). Endosoma membranous with large, bifurcated medial sclerite, which left branch is sharp and long, reaching subapically of endosoma and right branch broadened apically, about two times shorter than left branch; DSS short and indistinct, broadened basally, and nearly cylindrical at apical half. Left paramere ( Figs. 32–33 ). Apical process strongly protruding from paramere body, with distinct tooth situated on medial portion of dorsal surface; sensory lobe somewhat convex, covered with few long, protruding, bristlelike setae. Right paramere ( Fig. 34 ). Apical process relatively long, thin perpendicular to paramere body; paramere body ovoid, relatively broad, with bundle of rather short setae dorsally. Brachypterous female . STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND VESTITURE (Fig. 6). As in brachypterous male. Macropterous female . STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND VESTITURE (Fig. 8). As in macropterous male. Measurements. Brachypterous form ♀ (n=2)/♂ (n=1) ( holotype measurements second): Body . Length 2.6– 3.9/2.6 (2.6), width 1.15–1.5/0.9 (0.9). Head . Length 0.63–0.73/0.6 (0.6), width 0.58/0.5 (0.5), interocular distance 0.3/0.2 (0.2). Antenna . Length of segment I 0.38/0.4 (0.4), ♂: II 0.6 (0.6), III, IV—missing in examined specimens. Labium ♀: Length of segment I 0.43–0.63, II 0.62, III 0.66, IV 0.44. Pronotum . Length 0.6/0.5 (0.5), width of anterior margin ♀: 0.43–0.5, length of lateral margin ♀: 0.65–0.66, width of posterior margin 0.78/0.6 (0.6). Macropterous form ♀ (n=1)/♂ (n=1). Body . Length 3.12/3.3, width 1.3/1.1. Head . Length 0.54/0.65, width 0.49/0.56, interocular distance 0.13/0.28. Antenna ♀: Length of segment I 0.39, II 0.94, III 0.47, IV 0.65. Labium ♂: Length of segment I 0.5, II 1.02, III 0.61, IV 0.33. Pronotum . Length 0.57/0.59, width of anterior margin 0.46/ 0.47, length of lateral margin 0.65/0.69, width of posterior margin 1.0/1.0. Discussion . The wing polymorphism in the subfamily Cylapinae although rare, is present in four out of five currently recognized tribes. Only in the tribe Bothriomirini all known species are macropterous ( Wolski & Gorczyca 2012 ). The wing modification present in the genus Rewafulvius , with clavus and corium separated and only the inner portion of the membrane overlapping, can be classified as brachyptery sensu Schuh & Slater (1995 , according to Slater 1975 ). Within the Cylapinae similar modification of the hemelytron can be found in the genera Fulvius ( F. s l a t er i Wheeler) ( Henry et al. 2011 : Fig. 4), Hemiophthalmocoris Poppius (e.g. H. asthenops Gorczyca (Gorczyca 2000 : Fig. 30 A), and in Rhinocylapoides brachypterus Wolski & Gorczyca (Wolski & Gorczyca 2011 : Fig. 1). The wing modification most commonly occurring in Cylapinae is staphylinoidy. It is found in many species from Australian Region belonging to the genera Carvalhoma Slater & Gross (Slater & Gross 1977 : Figs. 6–7), Fulvioaustrus Carvalho (Carvalho 1991 : Fig. 14 ), Austrovannius Cassis, Schwartz & Moulds , and Vanniopsis Cassis, Schwartz & Moulds (Cassis et al. 2003 : Figs. 3D, 6, 8, 13) and also in Afrotropical Rhinofulvius albifrons (Reuter) ( Gorczyca 2000: 44A ). Coleoptery sensu Schuh & Slater (1995) is present in the genera Howefulvius Schmitz & Štys (Schmitz & Štys 1978: Fig. 1), Schizopteromiris Schuh (Schuh 1986 : Fig. 7, 6) (both from the Australian Region), Brachyfulvius Carvalho (Carvalho 1955 : Fig. 72) from Jamaica , Corcovadocola Carvalho (Carvalho 1948 : 2) from Brazil , and Afrofulvius Gorczyca (Gorczyca 2000 : Fig. 20 ) from the Afrotropics. Microptery sensu Schuh & Slater (1995) has so far been documented only once, in Mangalocoris miniatus Murphy & Polhemus from the Oriental Region ( Murphy & Polhemus 2012: Figs. 1A–D ). The wing modification in Cylapinae is found in both sexes (e.g. Austrovannius , Rewafulvius , Schizopteromiris ) or occurs only in females (e.g. Corcovodocola, Fulvius slateri ).