Eriophyoid (Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) mite fauna of Miandoab region in Iran with redescription of Aceria kiefferi (Nalepa)
Author
Mehri-Heyran, Hosein
. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran; E-mails: h. mehri 1374. hm @ gmail. com, Prslotfollahy @ yahoo. com, s _ azimi 2007 @ yahoo. com
Author
Lotfollahi, Parisa
. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran; E-mails: h. mehri 1374. hm @ gmail. com, Prslotfollahy @ yahoo. com, s _ azimi 2007 @ yahoo. com
Author
de, Enrico
Author
Lillo
. Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di. S. S. P. A.), Entomology and Zoology Section, University of Bari Aldo Moro, via Amendola, 165 / a, 70126 Bari, Italy; E-mail: enrico. delillo @ uniba. it
enrico.delillo@uniba.it
Author
Azimi, Solmaz
. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran; E-mails: h. mehri 1374. hm @ gmail. com, Prslotfollahy @ yahoo. com, s _ azimi 2007 @ yahoo. com
text
Persian Journal of Acarology
2020
2020-04-15
9
2
161
171
journal article
10.22073/pja.v9i2.59382
2251-8169
4644980
Aceria kiefferi
(
Nalepa, 1891
)
(
Fig. 2
)
Female (measured specimens n = 10)
Body
vermiform, 203–236 (excluding gnathosoma), 42–46 thick, 41–48 wide.
Gnathosoma
projecting obliquely downwards, chelicerae 15–22, palp 16–20, palp coxal setae
ep
2–3, dorsal palp genual setae
d
5–6, unbranched.
Prodorsal shield
26–32 including frontal lobe, 33–39 wide, subcircular; with a thin distally acute frontal lobe, 3–4, over gnathosomal base. Shield pattern distinct, consisting of complete median and admedian lines, inner submedian lines extending on ¾ of prodorsal shield length, one pair of complete outer submedian lines, some short lines among the inner and outer submedian lines, and the posterior prodorsal shield margin. Tubercles of scapular setae
sc
on rear shield margin, 20–24 apart, setae
sc
50–61, directed posterior divergently.
Legs
with all usual segments and setae. Leg I 27–33, trochanter 6–8, femur 10–12, genu 7–9, tibia 5–7, tarsus 6–8, tarsal solenidion
8–10 distally a little enlarged and tapered, empodium simple, 7–8, 4- rayed; femoral setae
bv
6–8, genual setae
l"
18–28, paraxial tibial setae
l'
8–10, located in basal forth of tibia, paraxial fastigial tarsal setae
ft
' 15–17, antaxial fastigial tarsal setae
ft"
24–29, paraxial unguinal tarsal setae
u'
4–5. Leg II 24–30, trochanter 6–8, femur 9–12, genu 5–8, tibia 5–7, tarsus 6–8, tarsal solenidion
8–10 distally a little enlarged and tapered, empodium simple, 7, 4-rayed; femoral setae
bv
7–9, genual setae
l"
10–13, paraxial fastigial tarsal setae
ft'
7–10, antaxial fastigial tarsal setae
ft
" 25–30, paraxial unguinal tarsal setae
u'
3–4.
Coxisternal region:
Prosternal apodeme 7–8, anterior setae on coxisternum I
1b
6–9, 11–12 apart; proximal setae on coxisternum I
1a
17– 22, 10–12 apart; proximal setae on coxisternum II
2a
38–46, 23–28 apart; 6–7 microtuberculate semiannuli between coxae and genital coverflap plus 2–3 transversal rows of lined granules at the base of the coverflap. Coxae with lined granules, dashes and short lines.
External genitalia
14–17, 21–25 wide, coverflap with 14 (no variation) longitudinal ridges; setae
3a
15–17, 17–20 apart.
Internal genitalia:
spermathecae ovoid, oriented posterolaterad; spermathecal tubes relatively short; transverse genital apodeme trapezoidal, distally folded.
Opisthosoma
dorsally arched, with 54–63 dorsal semiannuli, 64–72 ventral semiannuli.
Microtubercles
oval on posterior margin of dorsal semiannuli and posterior part of ventral semiannuli; spiny on the rear margin of the last 4–5 dorsal semiannuli and elongated and linear on last 5 (no variation) ventral semiannuli. Setae
c2
20– 26 on ventral semiannulus 10–12, setae
d
55–69 on ventral semiannulus 22–25; setae
e
13–17 on ventral semiannulus 37–42; setae
f
18–25 on ventral semiannulus 59–67; 5 (no variation) annuli posterior to setae
f
. Setae
h2
64–73 apically very thin,
h1
5–8.
Male (measured specimen n = 1)
Similar in shape and prodorsal shield arrangement to female. Body smaller than female, 187, 40 wide; palp genual setae
d
6; prodorsal shield 29, 37 thick; setae
sc
28, 13 apart. Opisthosoma with 61 dorsal semiannuli and 73 ventral semiannuli; 7 semiannuli between coxae and genitalia, with microtubercles similar to that of female. Setae:
1b
10,
1a
14,
2a
37,
c2
19,
d
42,
e
14,
f
20,
h1
6,
h2
51). Male genitalia 15 wide, setae
3a
18, 15 apart.
Type
host plant
Achillea millefolium
L. (Compositae), Common Yarrow, Milfoil.
Type
locality
Bitche
,
France
.
Relation to the host plant
Vagrant; causing leaf curling and flower deformation.
Material examined
17 females
and
1 male
mounted singly on separate microscope slides (AM-IWA-OK18M-1– 18), from
A. millefolium
in
Ozmanake Sofla village
,
Miandoab region
,
West Azerbaijan province
,
Iran
,
36° 58' 18'' N
,
46° 03' 14'' E
),
1,288 m
above sea level
, coll.
H. Mehri-Heyran
, late
July 2018
.
Other material
Mites preserved in a vial (AM-IWA-OK18M) of Oudemans' fluid (
Walter and Krantz 2009
) as extracted from the same sample as the
type
specimens.
Remarks
The original description of
A. kiefferi
by
Nalepa (1891)
and other descriptions published by
Farkas (1965)
and
Petanović (1988)
provide few morphological information, which makes difficult the comparisons between those descriptions and Iranian specimens. There are similarities in setae
sc
length (50 according to
Petanović (1988)
and
52–61 in
Iranian specimens) and setae
d
length (70 according to
Farkas (1965)
and
55–69 in
Iranian specimens). The prodorsal shield ornamentation of Iranian specimens is similar to
Farkas (1965)
drawings, but it shows some differences from the original drawing of
Nalepa (1891)
on the line arrangement on the shield lateral side and the drawing of
Petanović (1988)
on the length of median line and line arrangement of the shield lateral sides. The Iranian specimens differ from previous descriptions in the ornamentation of dorsal and ventral semiannuli:
Nalepa (1891)
and
Farkas (1965)
reported 60 dorsal semiannuli partly smooth and partly with fine microtubercles, and 60 microtuberculated ventral semiannuli;
Petanović (1988)
reported 70 smooth dorsal semiannuli and 70 microtuberculated ventral semiannuli; the Iranian specimens have 54–63 dorsal and 64–72 ventral semiannuli which are all provided with microtubercles. Another difference regards the ornamentation of female genital coverflap (10 striae according to
Petanović (1988)
versus
14 striae in the Iranian specimens). The only obvious difference is in the number of empodium rays (5 according to
Nalepa (1891)
,
Farkas (1965)
and
Petanović (1988)
versus
4 in
the Iranian specimens). It could be hypothesized that differences could be due to the consequence of intraspecific variability, geographic differences, host plant genotype differences and/or not so good quality of microscopes prepared in the past. No
holotype
or
paratypes
are available in the Nalepa's collection at the Natural History Museum of
Wien
(
Austria
).