Redescription of the poorly known crab spider Xysticus spasskyi (Araneae: Thomisidae)
Author
Marusik, Yuri M.
Author
Azarkina, Galina N.
text
Zootaxa
2016
4161
4
561
566
journal article
10.11646/zootaxa.4161.4.7
085eb98a-e00e-48ef-86c4-f60e57a7033f
1175-5326
272301
7A29F570-1FC9-4C6B-A8D9-DE8AE23F7BB7
Xysticus spasskyi
Utochkin, 1968
Figs 1‒22
Xysticus spasskyi
Utochkin, 1968
: 35
, figs 79‒80 (
♀
).
Ovtsharenko 1979
: 40
, fig. 21 (
♂
, synonymy with
X. umbrinus
).
Xysticus umbrinus
Utochkin 1968
: 25
, figs 27‒29 (
♂
).
Mcheidze 1997
: 157
, figs 264‒266 (
♂
).
Type material. Holotype
of
X. spasskyi
: female,
RUSSIA
,
Krasnodar Province
[“Chernomorskaya Gouvern”],
1300 m
,
12 July 1913
, Nasonov (PSU, “Zool. In-t 367‒913", examined).
Holotype
of
X. umbrinus
:
male,
RUSSIA
,
Krasnodar Province
["Caucasus, Kuban' Area”], 1915, N. Bogdanov-Kat'kov (PSU, “Zool. In-t 405-929", examined).
Other
material examined. THE CRIMEA:
2♂
2♀
, near
Yalta
,
Pinus pallasiana
forest, ca.
400 m
,
44°31'N
,
34°14'E
,
pitfall traps
,
25 June–2 July 2000
,
M.M. Kovblyuk
(
ZMMU
)
.
RUSSIA
:
North Ossetia
:
3♂
,
Ardon River
basin,
Kasar Canyon
,
Uiltsa Gorge
,
6 km
up from
Buron Village
, meadow in forest belt,
1500 m
, ca.
42°43'N
,
43°48'E
,
31 May–23 July 1985
,
S.K. Alexeev
(
ZMMU
)
.
AZERBAIJAN
:
Naxçıvan
Area:
2♂
1♀
, environments of
Bichenek Village
, oak forest,
2000 m
,
39°31.696'N
45°46.6'E
,
3 June 2003
,
Y.M. Marusik
&
E. Huseynov
(
ZMMU
)
;
Zagataly District
:
1♂
1♀
,
Rochugel
,
41°46'N
,
46°36'E
,
22 June 2003
,
N. Snegovaya
&
H. Aliev
(
ZMMU
)
;
Ismailly
District:
1♀
,
Velayasi
, ca.
40°57'N
,
48°10'E
,
27 June 2003
(
N. Snegovaya
&
H. Aliev
(
ZMMU
)
.
Note.
Holotypes
of
X. spasskyi
of
X. umbrinus
are mentioned by
Utochkin (1968)
as deposited in the collections of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, however they are kept in the
Perm
State University where Utochkin was working. Although the name
X. umbrinus
has a page priority over
X. spasskyi
,
Ovtsharenko (1979)
gave priority to the latter name without any explanation, but probably because
spasskyi
is a patronym.
Diagnosis.
Xysticus spasskyi
resembles
X. austrosibiricus
Logunov et Marusik, 1998
(
Logunov & Marusik 1998: figs 3‒4, 9‒10
). Males of the two species differ in the shape of median tegular apophysis and embolus. In both
X. spasskyi
and
X. austrosibiricus
the median tegular apophysis is wider than the lateral apophysis but in the former species it is oriented at exactly at 90° to the long axis of the palp whereas in
X. austrosibiricus
it is directed in a slightly posterior direction at an angle of approximately 45° to the long axis of the palp (
Logunov & Marusik 1998: fig. 3
). The embolic tip in
X. spasskyi
is modified (widened,
Figs 4, 6
,
14, 16‒17
), but not in
X. austrosibiricus
. The males differ also in the shape of the retrolateral apophysis tip, which is blunt in
X. spasskyi
and sharply pointed in
X. austrosibiricus
. The epigynes of the two species differ in the shape of the atrium which is subtriangular with an apical pocket and a well developed septum in
X. spasskyi
(
Figs 8‒11
) and subrectangular with a pair of apical pockets and a short septum in
X. austrosibiricus
(
Logunov & Marusik 1998: f. 9
). The endogynes (vulvae) of two species are very similar and differ in the position of receptacles which converge anteriorly in
X. spasskyi
and are subparallel in
X. austrosibiricus
.
FIGURES 14‒21.
Xysticus spasskyi
, specimens from the Crimea. 14‒15, 17‒18 Male palp (14 ventral, 15 retrolateral, 17 anterior, 18 ventro-prolateral); 16 tip of embolus and tutaculum, ventral; 19‒21 Epigyne (19 after maceration, dorsal, 20 after maceration, ventral; 21 anterior-ventral). Scale = 0.1 mm. Abbreviations:
Ap
anterior pocket;
Br
brush of hairs;
Em
embolus,
Fo
fovea (pit);
Ma
median tegular apophysis;
Pa
prolateral tegular apophysis;
RTA
retrolateral tibial apophysis;
Se
septum;
VTA
ventral tibial apophysis.
Description. Male (from Crimea):
Total length 4.9. Carapace 2.7 long, 2.65 wide. Colour and pattern as shown on
Figs 1‒2
, pattern slightly variable on carapace and abdomen. Legs yellow except femora and patellae; femora and patellae I‒II brown, femora and patellae III‒IV light brown. Leg measurements and spination as in
Tables 1
and
2
.
TABLE 1.
Leg measurements ♂/♀ (specimens from Crimea).
Fe |
Pa |
Ti |
Mt |
Ta |
Total |
I 2.75/3.25 |
1.15/1.75 |
2.0/2.25 |
2.1/1.95 |
1.1/1.15 |
9.1/10.35 |
II 2.75/3.25 |
1.15/1.75 |
2.0/2.25 |
2.05/1.95 |
0.85/1.1 |
8.8/10.3 |
III 1.95/2.25 |
0.9/1.2 |
1.25/1.4 |
1.2/1.15 |
0.75/0.8 |
6.05/6.8 |
IV 2.05/2.25 |
0.85/1.0 |
1.35/1.55 |
1.3/1.4 |
0.75/1.85 |
6.3/8.05 |
TABLE 2.
Male leg spination (specimen from Crimea).
Fe |
Pa |
Ti |
Mt |
I d4 p10 |
p1 r1 v0-1 |
p3 r3 v4-4 |
p2 r2 v4-3 |
II d5 p1 |
p1 r1 v0-1 |
p3 3r v4-4 |
p2 r2 v4-3 |
III d4 |
p1 r1 |
1d p2 r2 v3-3 |
p2 r2 v2-2 |
IV d5 |
p1 r1 |
2d p2 r2 v3-3 |
p2 r2 v2-2 |
Palp as in
Figs 4‒7
,
14‒18
; tibia with 2 apophyses, ventral (
VTA
) and retrolateral (
RTA
); ventral apophysis with brush of short setae (
Br
) on the tip; RTA longer than VTA, with blunt (not sharply pointed tip). Tegulum with 2 apophyses, massive, hack-like median apophysis (
Ma
) and claw-like prolateral apophysis (
Pa
). Embolus massive, thick, with modified tip (flattened with claw like extension).
Female (from Crimea):
Total length 6.75 long, Carapace 3.5 long, 3.4 wide. Colouration and pattern as in
Fig. 3
; carapace with distinct and abdomen with indistinct pattern; legs uniformly yellow. Leg measurements and spination as in
Tables 1
and
3
.
TABLE 3.
Female leg spination (specimen from Crimea).
Fe |
Ti |
Mt |
I |
p3 |
p4 r1 v8-6 |
p3 r2 v5-5 |
II |
d2 |
p4 r1 v6-6 |
p3 r2 v5-5 |
III |
d2 |
d1 p2 r1 v3-3 |
p3 r3 v2-2 |
IV |
d2 |
d2 p2 r2 v3-0 |
p3 r3 v2-2 |
Epigyne as in
Figs 8‒13
,
19‒21
; with large egg-shaped atrium, atrium with distinct borders and large septum (
Se
) occupying posterior part, anterior part with one pocket (
Ap
); atrium with 2 pairs of fovea (pits) visible in SEM micrographs but not in light microscopy; receptacles weakly sclerotized, long, fused in anterior part; copulatory ducts indistinct.
Remarks
. The male palps from different populations do not vary in their sizes (cf.
Figs 4‒7
), although there are some minor differences in the shape of the embolic tip.
All four intact epigynes examined contained mating plugs. All plugs seemed to be formed by a secretion produced by females. This is the first report of such plugs in the Coriarachninae.
Uhl
et al
. (2010)
reported on the mating plugs in two members of the subfamily,
Ozyptila claveata
(Walckenaer, 1837)
and "
Xysticus
spp.,
lanio
" only. In the former species the plug was formed by a part of the palp, and in the latter species it was of unclear origin.
Distribution
. The World Spider Catalogue (WSC 2016) lists the distribution of this species as
Russia
, although it has also been reported from
Georgia
,
Azerbaijan
and the Crimea (
Fig. 22
) (
Mikhailov 2013
;
Otto 2015
).