A revision of the spider genus Zaitunia (Araneae, Filistatidae) Author Sergei Zonstein Author Yuri M. Marusik text European Journal of Taxonomy 2016 2016-07-20 214 1 97 journal article 10.5852/ejt.2016.214 ee2ae0e8-2a06-4305-987e-e7e1fc97154a 269335 CA243C98-9461-441A-BBD9-ECBDEC103DD9 Key to species of the Zaitunia beshkentica- group (Male of Z. huberi sp. nov. and female of Z. psammodroma sp. nov. are unknown.) 1. Males ………………………………………………………………………………………………2 – Females ……………………………………………………………………………………………4 2. Metatarsus IV shortened and thickened with distal comb of short spines ( Fig. 30 G, K); palpal tibia and embolic keel shorter ( Figs 30 H–J, 44C); Turkmenistan …… Z. psammodroma sp. nov. – Metatarsus IV unmodified (as in Figs 28 A, D–F, 31E); palpal tibia and embolic keel longer ( Figs 28 G–I, 32A–G, 44B, D) ………………………………………………………………………3 3. Embolic keel lower and longer, and rounded at median part of terminal hook ( Figs 32 D–F, 44D); Kyrgyzstan ………………………………………………………………… Z. wunderlichi sp. nov. – Embolic keel higher and shorter, and ends abruptly at basal part of terminal hook ( Figs 28 G–I, 44B); Tajikistan, Uzbekistan ……………………………… Z. beshkentica ( Andreeva &Tyshchenko, 1969 ) 4. Receptacles short, globular and subequal in size ( Fig. 30 C–E); Afghanistan …… Z. huberi sp. nov. – Receptacles more elongate and noticeably differing by size ( Figs 29 I–K, 32H–I) …………………5 5. Median receptacles smaller than lateral pair ( Fig. 33 A–B) ………………… Z. wunderlichi sp. nov. – Median receptacles larger than lateral pair ( Fig. 29 I–K) ………………………………………… …………………………………………………… Z. beshkentica ( Andreeva & Tyshchenko, 1969 )