Oligocene vertebrate footprints from the Lower Red Formation, Central IranAuthorAbbassi, Nasrollah0000-0002-9994-9122Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, 45371 - 38971, IranAuthorSalehi Tinooni, MohammadGeological Survey of Iran, South-East Territory (Kerman), No. 10, Bastani-ye Parizi Blvd. Kerman, 76157 - 36841, IranAuthorGhorbani Dehnavi, MahdiGeological Survey of Iran, South-East Territory (Kerman), No. 10, Bastani-ye Parizi Blvd. Kerman, 76157 - 36841, IranAuthorShakeri, SafooraDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, 45371 - 38971, Iran & Research Affairs Office, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan 45371 - 38971, IranAuthorEshaghi, AliResearch Affairs Office, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan 45371 - 38971, IrantextFossil Record20242024-11-04272265287journal article10.3897/fr.27.133914A30F4FFF-547A-4323-80C0-771663DF6FB7IchnospeciesAvipeda phoenixVialov, 1965Fig. 3Materials.
Four footprints preserved in three slabs (
IFMI
-682
/ 1-3)
.
Diagnosis.
Small, tridactyl tracks up to
1.6 cm
long, digits short, relatively broad, angle (
Vialov 1965
; translated by
Lucas 2007
).
Description.
Slab
IFMI
- 682 / 1 (Fig.
3 A, B
) includes medium-sized, tridactyl footprints, preserved as concave epirelief on the upper bedding plane of fine-grained, ripple-mark-bearing, brown sandstone. Digit imprints are straight, with sharp tips, slightly deformed by reliefs of ripple marks, and connected to each other in the heel part. The digit
III
imprint is thicker and larger than the lateral digits, and wider in the front part of the digits; one digital pad is visible in the distal part of digit
III
. Slab
IFMI
- 682 / 2 comprises one medium-sized tridactyl footprint, preserved as convex hyporelief in a lower bedding plane of thin-bedded, fine-grained brown sandstone (Fig.
3 C
). Digit
III
is longer than the lateral digits, and the interdigital angle between digit
II
and
IV
is wide. The metapodium imprint is an eminence, and the digits are connected to the metapodium. Proximal outline of the footprints slightly convex, without digit I imprint. Small slab no.
IFMI
- 682 / 3 includes one tridactyl bird footprint, preserved as concave epirelief on the fine-grained brown sandstone, filled by fine-grained, lighter, silt-size sediments (Fig.
3 D
). Similar to previous slabs, it shows a digit
III
imprint larger than the lateral digits. One of the lateral digits (here considered as digit
IV
) is thicker than the other. The tips of the digits are round or slightly sharp in the footprint slabs of
IFMI
- 682.
Avipeda phoenix
.
A. B.
Preserved as concave epirelief on the ripple mark-bearing surface of sandstone (sampled
IFMI
- 682 / 1);
C, D.
Preserved as convex hyporeliefs (sampled specimen,
IFMI
- 682 / 2-3).
Discussion.Vialov (1965)
established
Avipeda
with three ichnospecies
Avipeda phoenix
,
A. sirin
, and
A. filiportatis
. Later, other new ichnospecies were added or recombined with
Avipeda
. Sarjeant and Langstone (1994) recombined
Passeripedia ipolyensisKordos (1985)
as
Avipeda ipolyensis
but
Abbassi et al. (in press
) believe that the diagnosis of
P. ipolyensis
lacks any distinctive feature, and there is no description and considered
Passeripedia ipolyensis
as a
nomen dubium
. On the other hand,
Abbassi et al. (in press
) considered
A. sirin
as a junior synonym of
A. phoenix
, and
Sarjeant and Langston (1994)
recombined
A. filiportatis
as
Gruipeda filiportatis
. Thus, the valid ichnospecies of
Avipeda
include:
Avipeda aduncaSarjeant & Langston, 1994
.
Avipeda circumontisLockley et al., 2022
.
Avipeda gryponyxSarjeant & Reynolds, 2001
.
Avipeda phoenixVialov, 1965
.
Avipeda rastiniAbbassi, 2022
.
Avipeda thrinaxSarjeant & Reynolds, 2001
.
The studied materials of the Deh Nar section, show similar shape to the
type
materials of
A. phoenix
, mainly with its wide lateral digit angle, although the Den Nar materials are larger.