Contribution to the Chinese subfamily Rhaphidophorinae Walker, 1869 (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae; Rhaphidophorinae): New additions to the genera Eurhaphidophora and Stonychophora Author Bian, Xun Author Shi, Fuming text Zootaxa 2016 2016-05-05 4109 1 46 58 journal article 39132 10.11646/zootaxa.4109.1.4 4c8221b9-b53d-4fab-bea3-b444f4f0636d 1175-5326 257511 2FF752E8-7E72-441C-8CF7-B7D931CE2964 Key to species of Eurhaphidophora 1. Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite distinctly narrow and long ( Fig. 1 A, C, E)........................... 2 - Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite broad and short ( Fig. 1 G, H, J, L, M, O , Q)........................... 4 2. Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite with posterior margin divided in the middle ( Fig. 1 B, D)................ 3 - Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite with median longitudinal carina on dorsal surface, its posterior margin obtusely rounded ( Fig. 1 E); male epiproct arcuately curved, with 1 deep concavity medially and some weak longitudinal rugosities laterally ( Fig. 2 M); posterior margin of male subgenital plate obtusely rounded, styli obvious longer than other known congeners ( Fig. 2 N).......................................................... .. E. bona Gorochov, 2012 3. Male eighth abdominal tergite with long median process ( Fig. 1 A); median process of ninth abdominal tergite obviously curved ventrad, posterior margin with 1 deep and narrow concavity in the middle, the lateral sides lobate ( Fig. 1 A, B); dorsoposterior surface of male epiproct longitudinal concave in the middle, posterior margin with 1 acute angle medially and 1 pair of rounded lateral lobes ( Fig. 2 I); posterior margin of male subgenital plate shallowly concave between styli ( Fig. 2 J)...................................................................................... E. tarasovi Gorochov, 2010 - Male eighth abdominal tergite with roundly angled median process ( Fig. 1 C); median process of ninth abdominal tergite weakly curved ventrad, apical area with 1 pair of spine-shaped processes ( Fig. 1 C, D); apical area of male epiproct elongate, posterior margin narrowly rounded ( Fig. 2 C)............................................ E. bispina Gorchov, 2010 FIGURE 1. Apex of male abdomen of Eurhaphidophora spp. A, C, E, G, H, K, L, M, O, Q. apex of abdomen in dorsal view; B, D, N, P. apex of process of male ninth abdominal tergite; I, R. apex of abdomen in lateral view; J. apex of abdomen in apicodorsal view; F. apex of process of male ninth abdominal tergite; A, B. E. tarasovi ( Gorochov, 2010b : Figs. 10, 11); C, D. E. bispina ( Gorochov, 2010b : Figs. 16, 17); E, F. E. bona ( Gorochov, 2012 : Figs. 2, 3); G. E. angust a ( Gorochov, 2010b : Fig. 2); H, I. E. visibilis ( Gorochov, 2010a : Figs. 11, 12); J, K. E. rotundata ( Gorochov, 2010b : Figs. 20, 21); L. E. laosi ( Gorochov, 2010b : Fig. 6); M, N. E. ampla ( Gorochov, 2010b : Figs. 65, 66); O, P. E. orlovi ( Gorochov, 2010b : Figs. 70, 71); Q, R. E. nataliae ( Gorochov, 1999 : Figs. 308, 309). 4. Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite widened toward apex, apical area divided into 3 large lobes ( Fig. 1 Q, R); male epiproct triangular ( Fig. 2 D)........................................................ E. nataliae Gorochov, 2010 - Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite with apical area not divided ( Fig. 1 G, H, J, L, M, O )................... 5 5. Male ninth abdominal tergite narrow, entirely separately from its posterior median process, the lateral margins of median process obviously concave and apical area widened ( Fig. 1 O , P); male epiproct longer than broad, posterior margin slightly concave, the lateral lobes large ( Fig. 2 K); posterior margin of male subgenital plate nearly straight ( Fig. 2 L)................................................................................................. E. orlovi Gorochov, 2010 - Male ninth abdominal tergite broad, median process not separated from the tergite ( Fig. 1 G, H, J, L, M)................. 6 6. Dorsal surface of median process of male ninth abdominal tergite with obvious longitudinal carina or concavity ( Fig. 1 G, H)..................................................................................................... 7 - Dorsal surface of median process of male ninth abdominal tergite flat ( Figs. 1 J, L; 4E) or with weak longitudinal concavity ( Fig. 1 M)............................................................................................ 8 7. Male ninth abdominal tergite with obvious longitudinal dorsal concavity and nearly truncate posterior margin ( Fig. 1 G); the process partly separated from other part of tergite by weak fold broken in middle ( Fig. 1 G); posterior margin of male epiproct with posterior margin acute angular ( Fig. 2 A); posterior margin of male subgenital plate nearly straight ( Fig. 2 B)......................................................................................... E. angusta Gorochov, 2010 - Male ninth abdominal tergite with obvious longitudinal dorsal carina and truncate posterior margin ( Fig. 1 H); this process not separated from other part of tergite ( Figs. 1 H; 3G); male epiproct nearly rectangular, posterior margin of nearly obtusely rounded or with 1 shallowly concavity in the middle ( Fig. 2 O ); posterior margin of male subgenital plate nearly straight ( Fig. 3 H)............................................................................ E. visibilis Gorochov, 2010 8. Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite nearly semi-oval, narrowing to apical area, posterior margin obtusely rounded ( Fig. 1 J); male epiproct with posterior margin rounded ( Fig. 1 K)......................... E. rotundata Gorochov, 2010 - Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite nearly rectangular or trapezoidal ( Figs. 1 L, M; 4E), posterior margin nearly straight..............................................................................................9 9. Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite rectangular ( Fig. 1 L, M)........................................ 10 - Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite nearly trapezoidal, eighth abdominal tergite with 1 small angled process ( Fig. 4 E); male epiproct nearly triangular, posterior margin acute angular; styli nearly cylindrical ( Fig. 4 G, H)............................................................................................ E. truncata Bian & Shi sp. nov. 10. Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite shorter and wider than other known congeners ( Fig. 1 L); male epiproct with posterior margin obtusely rounded ( Fig. 2 E); posterior margin of male subgenital plate slightly projected in the middle ( Fig. 2 F).............................................................................. E. laosi Gorochov, 2010 - Median process of male ninth abdominal tergite with apical area widened ( Fig. 1 M); male epiproct with a pair of rounded apical lobes on posterior margin ( Fig. 2 G); posterior margin of male subgenital plate distinctly projected in middle, apex acute ( Fig. 2 H)........................................................................ E. ampla Gorochov, 2010