Three new species of Magnolia (Magnoliaceae) endemic to the north-wet-arc in the Maya Highlands of Guatemala Author Vázquez-García, J. Antonio Author Tribouillier-Navas, Erick 0000-0002-5052-0106 Estación Experimental de Orquídeas de la familia Archila, 1 Avenida 5 - 28 Zona 1, Cobán Alta Verapaz 16001, Guatemala & forestribouillier @ hotmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 5052 - 0106 forestribouillier@hotmail.com Author Archila, Fredy Author Véliz, Mario 0000-0002-3134-2690 Herbarium BIGU, Escuela de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Zona 12, Guatemala City, Guatemala & marioeveliz 64 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 3134 - 2690 marioeveliz64@gmail.com Author Peña, A. Salome Ortega 0000-0002-3297-8316 Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Herbario IBUG, Instituto de Botánica, Departamento de Botánica y Zoología, Zapopan, 45200, Jalisco, México & 4.08. ortega. alondra. 210696 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 3297 - 8316 4.08.ortega.alondra.210696@gmail.com Author Shalisko, Viacheslav 0000-0001-5626-0491 Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Herbario IBUG, Instituto de Botánica, Departamento de Botánica y Zoología, Zapopan, 45200, Jalisco, México & vshalisko @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5626 - 0491 vshalisko@gmail.com text Phytotaxa 2021 2021-12-30 529 1 57 70 journal article 2806 10.11646/phytotaxa.529.1.4 d050f2f4-20b6-4c1c-9b06-c02a80a4d589 1179-3163 5814288 Magnolia javieri A.Vázquez, Tribouillier & Archila , sp. nov. ( Fig. 2 ) Type:— GUATEMALA . Alta Verapaz : Municipality of Tactic , Finca Río Frio, 1345 m , 15°20’32.7”N , 90°25’09.1”W , with Spondias purpurea , Liquidambar styraciflua , Alnus acuminata ; Perymenium grande , Persea schiedeana and Pouteria viridis , Feb 2015 (fl, fr), Tribouillier & Archila MG-077 ( holotype : BIGU ; isotype: IBUG). Magnolia javieri belongs to the M . sect. Magnolia and is similar to M. archilana , also from Alta Verapaz , differing from the latter in its smaller, abaxially glabrous leaves vs. abaxially ferruginous-pubescent on the veins, apex deeply emarginate vs. round, apiculate; smaller flowers and fruits ( Table 1 ). Another similar species is M. guatemalensis from the Alta Verapaz Department . It differs in its longer petiole, smaller leaves and abaxially glabrous, shorter peduncles, smaller flowers, sepals and petals, fewer stamens, glabrescent polyfollicles and more carpels. Table 1. Comparison of Magnolia javieri with M. archilana and M. guatemalensis .

M. javieri	M. archilana	M. guatemalensis
Petiole length (cm)	2.3–2.8	2.0–2.2	1.5–2.0
Leaf size (cm)	9.0–11.0 × 5.0–7.5	12.0–14.0 × 8.0–9.0	12.0–16.0 × 8.0–11.0
Leaf abaxial vestiture	Glabrous	Ferruginous pubescent in the veins	Scattered brown-pubescent
Leaf ápex	Deeply emarginate	Round and apiculate	acute, acuminate to cuspidate
Flower size (cm)	9.0–10.0	12.0–14.0	13.0–15.0
Sepal size (cm)	4.0–4.3×1.5–1.7	7.5–7.8 × 3.5–4.0	5.8–6.0 × 2.1–2.2
Outer petal size (cm)	4.5–4.6 ×2.2–2.3	8.3–8.8 × 5.5–5.8	6.5–7.0 × 2.8–3.0
Peduncle length (cm)	1.5–1.8	3.0–3.4	2.8–3.2
Stamen number	80–82	72–76	92–98
Fruit size (cm)	4–4.4×1.8–2.0	7.0–7.5 ×3.4–3.6	5.0–7.5 × 2.3–2.7
Fruit vestiture	Pubescent	Glabrous	Pubescent
Carpel number	40–44	34–39	22–25

Trees 9.0–12.0 m tall, 30.0 cm diameter at 1.3 m above ground; branches 0.5 cm in diameter; petiole 2.3–2.8 × 0.2–0.3 cm , inconspicuously ribbed and basally slightly geniculate glabrous; leaves 9.0–11.0 × 5.0– 7.5 cm , obovate, glabrous on both surfaces, with 14 veins per side, apex deeply emarginate, base obtuse, strongly revolute; flowers 9.0– 10.0 cm in diameter, white; perules 0.9 × 0.3 cm , glabrous; rough, spathaceous bract 1, 2.0 cm long and 2.0 cm wide, glabrous on both surfaces, with a small group of hairs on the apex; flower peduncle 1.5–1.8 × 0.4–0.6 cm , glabrous, ribbed; sepals 3, 4.0–4.3 × 1.5–1.7 cm , white-greenish, glabrous, oblong, rounded apex, with conspicuous veins; petals 6, 4.5–4.6 × 2.2–2.3 cm , white, spatulate, glabrous; staminophore 0.5–0.7 cm long; purple; stamens 80–82, 0.8–0.9 cm long; gynoecium 1.6–1.8 × 1.0– 1.2 cm , greenish white, glabrescent with pubescence at the base and edges of the carpels, the hairs hyaline; polyfollicles 4.0–4.4 × 1.8–2.0 cm, ellipsoid, pale green, glabrescent, pendulous at maturity, suberect in their juvenile stage, follicles 40–44, 1.1–1.2 × 0.4–0.5 cm ; seeds 0.4 × 0.5 cm , with salmon-coloured sarcotestas. Distribution, phenology and ecology : — Known only from Tactic, Alta Verapaz and Uspantán, Quiché with only 24 individuals, at 1350–1670 m in cloud forest; flowering June–August, fruiting August–September. Other specimens examined:— GUATEMALA . Alta Verapaz : municipality of Tactic , Finca Río Frío , 1345 m , Aug 2020 (fl, fr), Tribouillier & Archila MG-078 (BIGU) . El Quiché : municipality of Uspantán , 1661 m , 15°20’51.2”N , 90°50’17.0”W , Jun 2021 (fl) Vázquez , et al.10191 (IBUG); (fl) Aguilar et al. MG-100 (BIGU); (inm. fl) Aguilar et al. MG-101 (BIGU); (fl) Aguilar et al. MG-102 (BIGU); (inm. fl) Aguilar et al. MG-103 (BIGU); (inm. fl) Aguilar et al. MG-104 (BIGU); (fl) Aguilar et al. MG-105 (BIGU) Etymology:— Dedicated to Javier Archila Cortez, co-collector of the species. Conservation status:— Endemic to two locations in Alta Verapaz and Quiché . After field exploration, no further populations were encountered. The species was unofficially assessed as endangered (EN), fulfilling criterion B2ab (iii) following IUCN (2019) criteria, version 14. The area of occupancy of population was estimated as 8 km 2 using the 2× 2 km grid cells, thus the taxon meets the B2 area of occupancy requirement for critically endangered species. However, in the number of localities, the taxon does only fulfils the conditions for endangered. The condition (b (iii)) is fulfilled as the decline in species habitat area is inferred, since the species habitat in type locality is at risk of destruction in absence of conservation actions, caused by logging of forests for establishment of monoculture plantations of Pinus maximinoi Moore (1966: 8) . Additional factors considered in the assessment include the severe fragmentation of the potential habitat due to the expansion of the agriculture, cutting of trees for firewood and production of timber and establishment of other commercial forest monocultures. These forests are not within any protected area.