The copepod genus Hatschekia Poche, 1902 (Siphonostomatoida: Hatschekiidae) from triggerfishes (Pisces: Tetraodontiformes: Balistidae) from off the Ryukyu Islands, Japan, with descriptions of eleven new species Author Uyeno, Daisuke Author Nagasawa, Kazuya text Zootaxa 2010 2478 1 40 journal article 10.5281/zenodo.195334 5c776f2d-8efa-408e-855d-5688a5ca2c0e 1175-5326 195334 Hatschekia jonesi n. sp. ( Figs 16–29 ) Type material. Holotype , female ( NSMT –Cr 20901), ex Sufflamen bursa (Bloch & Schneider) ( Tetraodontiformes : Balistidae ), off Cape Maeda ( 26°26’N , 127°46’E ), Okinawa-jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands, East China Sea, Japan , 2 September 2005 . Paratypes : 6 females ( NSMT –Cr 20902), ex S . bursa , off Cape Maeda ( 26°26’N , 127°46’E ), Okinawa-jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands, East China Sea, Japan , 2 September 2005 . Other material examined. 5 females ( RUMF –ZC–00922), ex S . fraenatum (Latreille) , off Chatan ( 26°19’N , 127°44’E ), Okinawa-jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands, East China Sea, Japan , 9 December 2005 . Description of female. Body ( Fig. 16 ) 837–1034 (902 ± 61) long, excluding caudal rami (n = 12). Cephalothorax round, slightly shorter than wide [175–220 (195 ± 16) × 212–276 (236 ± 20)], with dorsal, Mshaped chitinous frame. Trunk rod-like, longer than wide [666–818 (711 ± 47) × 166–198 (182 ± 12)], widest in anterior ¼. Urosome ( Fig. 17 ) excluding caudal ramus shorter than wide [34–49 (42 ± 5) × 58–80 (69 ± 7)]. Genital complex fused to abdomen without border. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 17 ) slightly longer than wide [15–28 (20 ± 4) × 10–17 (13 ± 2)], bearing 5 naked setae. Rostrum expanded anteriorly with 1 round process on each posterolateral corner ( Fig. 18 ). Antennule ( Fig. 18 ) indistinctly 5-segmented, 138–166 (146 ± 9) long; armature formula: 9, 5, 4, 1, 13 + 1 aesthetasc. Antenna ( Fig. 19 ) 3-segmented; proximal segment (coxa) unarmed; middle segment (basis) ornamented with surface pits; terminal claw bearing 1 basal seta; proximal segment length 41–50 (39 ± 16); middle segment length 101–135 (99 ± 42); terminal claw length 25–32 (24 ± 10); total length 169–210 (162 ± 67). Parabasal papilla ( Fig. 20 ) well developed, wrinkled, extending to mid-lateral level of cephalothorax and visible from dorsal side. Oral cone robust. Mandible ( Fig. 21 ) slender, with 4 sharp apical teeth. Maxillule ( Fig. 22 ) bilobate; both lobes armed with 2 tapering elements; 2 elements on inner lobe swollen. Maxilla ( Fig. 23 ) 4- segmented; proximal segment unarmed; second segment rod-like, with 1 basal seta; third segment elongate, with 1 distal seta; terminal segment small, with 1 small seta and bifid claw. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1 and 2 ( Figs 24–25 ) biramous, with exopods composed of 2 indistinct segments and 2–segmented endopods; leg armature formula as follows:
Protopod Exopod Endopod
Leg 1 1–1 1–0; 6 0–0; 5
Leg 2 1–0 1–0; 5 0–0; 4
Leg 1 ( Fig. 24 ) 87–105 (93 ± 6) long; protopod length 44–59 (50 ± 4); exopod length [39–46 (42 ± 2)] exceeding endopod length [24–36 (29 ± 3)]. Leg 2 ( Fig. 25 ) length 94–114 (102 ± 7); protopod length 57–69 (64 ± 4); exopod length 35–45 (38 ± 3); endopod length 45–56 (51 ± 3). Both exopods and protopod of leg 2 ornamented with rows of blunt spinules on anterior surface. Endopod of leg 2 broad. Intercoxal sclerites of legs 1 and 2 ( Figs 26–27 ) bearing 4 processes. Leg 3 ( Fig. 28 ) represented by 2 simple setae on small conical process at anterior mid-lateral surface of trunk. Leg 4 ( Fig. 29 ) represented by 1 simple lateral seta on posterior ¾ of trunk. Variability of measurement. Specimens used as “other materials” did not show remarkable differences in meristic characters. Measurements of body parts and appendages as follows: body length 598–874 (779 ± 105), cephalothorax length 126–199 (180 ± 31), cephalothorax width 187–224 (210 ± 41), trunk length 472– 690 (603 ± 80), trunk width 125–227 (199 ± 42), abdomen length 28–46 (38 ± 7), abdomen width 49–74 (65 ± 10), caudal ramus length 17–23 (20 ± 3), caudal ramus width 9–13 (12 ± 2), antennule length 110–160 (141 ± 20), antenna proximal segment length 28–44 (39± 7), antenna middle segment length 57–92 (80 ± 16), antenna terminal segment length 18–35 (26 ± 6), antenna total length 103–163 (145 ± 25), leg 1 length 58–84 (76 ± 11), leg 1 protopod length 34–52 (44 ± 8), leg 1 exopod length 24–38 (33 ± 5), leg 1 endopod length 18– 29 (26 ± 4), leg 2 length 58–92 (80 ± 14), leg 2 protopod length 37–60 (53 ± 9), leg 2 exopod length 21–32 (27 ± 5), leg 2 endopod length 23–38 (31 ± 6). FIGURES 16–23. Hatschekia jonesi n. sp. , female, holotype NSMT–Cr 20901. 16, habitus dorsal; 17, posterior part of trunk, dorsal; 18, antennule, ventral, rp = rostrum process (drawn from a paratype, NSMT–Cr 20902); 19, antenna, ventral. (drawn from a paratype, NSMT–Cr 20902); 20, antenna with parabasal papilla (drawn from a paratype, NSMT– Cr 20902); 21, mandible (drawn from a paratype, NSMT–Cr 20902); 22, maxillule; 23, maxilla. Scale bars: 16, 200μm; 17–19, 23, 40μm; 20, 22, 20μm; 21, 10μm. FIGURES 24–29. Hatschekia jonesi n. sp. , female, holotype NSMT–Cr 20901. 24, leg 1, anterior view; 25, leg 2, anterior view; 26, intercoxal sclerite of leg 1, anterior view; 27, intercoxal sclerite of leg 2, anterior view; 28, leg 3, ventral; 29, leg 4, ventral. Scale bars: 24–27, 30μm; 28–29, 10μm. Attachment site. Gill filaments.
Remarks. Hatschekia jonesi n. sp. also has 4 processes on the intercoxal sclerites of legs 1 and 2. These processes are shared with 10 species (see remarks for H . hemicyclium ) and one new species, namely H . hemicyclium n. sp. Hatschekia jonesi n. sp. is distinguishable from 7 species ( H . balistae , H . bibullae , H . cylindrus , H. khahajya , H . kuroshioensis , H . monacanthi and H . pseudostracii ) by having leg 3 located on a small conical process. Even though the base of leg 3 was not described for H . balistae it can be separated from the new species by the presence of an apex on the cephalothorax. Hatschekia hemicyclium n. sp. differs from the new species as follows: leg 2 with the exopod longer than the endopod, a considerably higher leg 2 exopod length/endopod length ratio [1.39 ± 0.16 vs. 0.80 ± 0.08 (U-test; p <0.001), Table 1 ], a smaller parabasal papilla, leg 3 represented by setae on a small papilla, and leg 2 with a broad endopod. Hatschekia lima is distinguishable from the new species by having 4 setae on the distal tip of the endopod of leg 1 and the maxillule with a highly sclerotized inner lobe while H . sunaoi is differentiated from the new species by having a distinctly higher antenna length/body length ratio [0.40 ± 0.03, vs. 0.18 ± 0.06 (U-test; p <0.001), Table 1 , see also table 1 in Uyeno & Nagasawa 2009b ] and by not having a well-developed parabasal papilla ( Uyeno & Nagasawa 2009b ). Etymology. The specific name of the new species, jonesi , honors Dr. J. B. Jones who has greatly contributed to the taxonomy of the genus Hatschekia .