Lectotypification of 16 names in Rubus subg. Idaeobatus, 12 names in R. subg. Malachobatus, and 1 name in R. subg. Chamaebatus (Rosaceae) Author Idrees, Muhammad 0000-0001-7031-7247 College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641000, Sichuan, China & idreesbiotech @ yahoo. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 7031 - 7247 idreesbiotech@yahoo.com Author Zhang, Zhiyong 0000-0003-4533-1789 College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641000, Sichuan, China & zhangzyong 219 @ 126. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 4533 - 1789 text Phytotaxa 2022 2022-08-19 559 1 13 24 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 journal article 124888 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 007d42e0-65f9-4fa1-84f7-e3013a33d03d 1179-3163 7009287 4. Rubus cockburnianus Hemsley (1892: 305) Type ( lectotype designated here ):— CHINA . Sichuan West Sichaun and Tibetan Frontier , chiefly near Tachienlu , 9000-13500ft , A.E. Pratt 97 (barcode K000737805!, isolectotypes: A00040554, K000737803!, K000737804!, P00746066!, P00746068!). [Image available at http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000737805] . Note :— Hemsley (1892) cited one collection “ Pratt 97 ” in the protologue when he described Rubus cockburnianus , without indicating the herbaria where the specimen was deposited. We located six duplicate specimens, one of them in A (barcode 00040554), three of them deposited in K (barcode 000737803-000737805), and two of them in P (barcode 00746066 & 00746068) from which lectotype could be chosen (Art. 9.12 of ICN ). Hence, we designate here the specimen “ A.E. Pratt ” in K (barcode 000737805) as the lectotype . The selected sheet is complete and well preserved specimens that fully correspond with the protologue.