Macrobiotus nebrodensis and Adropion vexatum, two new species of Eutardigrada (Tardigrada, Parachela) from Sicily
Author
Pilato, Giovanni
Author
Sabella, Giorgio
Author
D’Urso, Vera
Author
Lisi, Oscar
text
Zootaxa
2017
2017-12-05
4362
2
267
279
journal article
31235
10.11646/zootaxa.4362.2.6
32e43479-c921-4ae9-a1bd-f31e99cb09f4
1175-5326
1084072
1AEA8FDA-869C-4A90-88FC-B0A97F15732F
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
Fig. 4
Type
locality:
Nebrodi Mountains
,
Cesarò
:
Pizzo Antenna
,
1640 m
a.s.l.
, (
37°55'57"N
,
14°41'30"E
).
Material examined:
Holotype (slide No. 5755) and 5 paratypes (slides Nos. 5754, 5756, 5757 and 5782) from a lichen sample on a tree collected by Dr. Rosario Catanzaro (
29.04.1986
).
Specific diagnosis:
Colourless; cuticle smooth; eye spots absent in living specimens; bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of
Adropion
type
; buccal tube narrow; its length is 36.5–39 % of the total length of the bucco-pharyngeal tube; stylet supports inserted on the buccal tube at 63–66 % of the buccal tube length; pharyngeal tube longer than the pharyngeal bulb; pharyngeal bulb with small apophyses and three rod-shaped macroplacoids; microplacoid and septulum absent. The macroplacoid row length is
c
. 50% of the pharyngeal bulb length. Claws of the
Hypsibius
type
; the main branches with accessory points; lunules and other cuticular thickenings on the legs absent (small dots excluded).
Description of the
holotype
:
Body length 302 µm; colourless; eye spots absent in living specimens; cuticle smooth but with small dots on the legs. Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of
Adropion
type
(
Fig. 4A
): mouth anteroventral and a steep, almost vertical, front to the head (
Fig. 4B
); bucco-pharyngeal tube (53.9 µm long) without drop-shaped thickening between the rigid buccal tube and the flexible pharyngeal tube; the latter with a spiral thickening. Buccal tube length, 21.0 µm (
pbf
= 39.0) and 1.8 µm wide
(pt
= 8.6) without ventral lamina; stylet supports inserted on the buccal tube at 65.5% of its length (
pt
= 65.5); pharyngeal tube length, 32.9 µm. Pharyngeal bulb elliptic, 30.3 µm by 21.8 µm, with small apophyses and three rod-shaped macroplacoids; microplacoid and septulum absent (
Fig. 4A
). Macroplacoid length: first, 4.0 µm long (
pt
= 19.0), second, 4.0 µm (
pt
= 19.0), third, 6.5 µm (
pt
= 31.0); entire macroplacoid row length, 14.6 µm (
pt
= 69.5).
FIGURE 4.
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
A
, Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of the holotype; it is evident that the drop-shaped thickening is not present between buccal and pharyngeal tube.
B,
paratype (slide No. 5754) showing the steep, almost vertical front of the head.
C,
Claws of the second pair of legs (holotype). Scale bar = 10 µm.
Claws of the
Hypsibius
type
(
Fig. 4A,C
); the external claws are longer than the internal and have a longer secondary branch. External claw of legs I, 10.2 µm long (
pt
= 48.6) (the main branch length is 75.4% of the entire claw length); internal claws of the same pair of legs 7.5 µm long (
pt
= 35.7); external claws of the second and third pairs of legs 12.7 µm long (
pt
= 60.5) (their main branch length is 74.0% of the entire claws length); internal claws II and III 9.1 µm long (
pt
= 43.3); the posterior claws on the hind legs are bent and therefore could not be measured; the anterior claws are 10.0 µm long (
pt
= 47.6). Main branches of all claws with accessory points; lunules and other cuticular thickenings on the legs, absent (small dots excluded).
Remarks:
The
paratypes
are similar to the
holotype
in both morphological and quantitative characters; the morphometric characters of the
holotype
and three
paratypes
that were correctly orientated for measurements are reported in
Table 1
.
Differential diagnosis:
There are six species of
Adropion
described with smooth cuticle, three macroplacoid and lacking microplacoid and septulum:
Adropion prorsirostre
,
Adropion arduifrons
(
Thulin, 1928
)
,
Adropion clavatum
(
Bartoš, 1935
)
,
Adropion carolae
,
Adropion montigenum
and
Adropion modestum
.
The new species differs from
Adropion carolae
in having less elongate pharyngeal bulb (
Figs. 4A
and
5A
); macroplacoid row clearly shorter with respect to the buccal tube length (
pt
=
69.5–79.7 in
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov
.
,
98.7 in
Adropion carolae
), and with respect to the pharyngeal bulb length (48.2–55.6% in the new species, 64–67% in
Adropion carolae
); and by having longer claws (
pt
of the posterior and anterior claws IV about 77 and 44–49 respectively, and in
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov
.
,
c
. 55 and 42 respectively in
Adropion carolae
).
FIGURE 5. A,
Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of
Adropion carolae
.
B,
Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of a specimen of
Adropion prorsirostre
from the Thulin collection.
C
, Claws of the third pair of legs of
Adropion montigenum
.
D
, Claws of the hind legs of
Adropion montigenum
. Scale bar = 10 µm.
The antero-ventral mouth and a steep front to the head of the new species separates it from
Adropion clavatum
,
Adropion modestum
and
Adropion prorsirostre
. Additional characters differentiating these species include: absence of granulation on the caudal portion of the body, pharyngeal tube longer than the pharyngeal bulb, and the third macroplacoid not caudally clavate for
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
but present in
Adropion clavatum
. A less elongate pharyngeal bulb and presence of small apophyses in
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
, longer pharyngeal bulb and absent apophyses in
Adropion modestum
, and a shorter placoid row length (near half the pharyngeal bulb length in the new species, 48.2–55.6%, and 73–74% in
Adropion modestum
). The pharyngeal tube clearly longer than the pharyngeal bulb (
Figs. 4A
and
5B
, and
Table 1
) in
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
, shorter for
Adropion prorsirostre
(
Figs. 4A
and
5B
, and
Table 1
), a narrower bucco-pharyngeal tube (the
pt
index is
8.6–8.9 in
the new species
10.6–13.9 in
Adropion prorsirostre
Figs. 4A, B
and
5B
), lower values of the
pt
index relative to the stylet support insertion point (about
63–66 in
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov
.
and about
68.5–71 in
Adropion prorsirostre
,
Table 1
), and higher values of the
pt
index relative to the claw lengths (
Table 1
).
TABLE 1.
Morphological measurements for the holotype and three correctly orientated paratypes of
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
, plus a specimen of
Adropion prorsirostre
. Measurements given in µm, with
pbf
and
pt
index values for relevant structures, and the percent ratio between the main branch and the total length of the external claw.
Adropion
|
vexatum
sp. nov.
|
Adropion prorsirostre
|
No. slide |
5757 paratype |
5757 paratype |
5755 holotype |
5754 paratype |
1036 |
Body length Total bucco-pharyngeal tube length Buccal tube length |
255 55.6 20.3 |
About 260? 21.3 |
302 53.9 21.0 |
316 56.2 21.7 |
245 51.7 20.9 |
pbf
ratio Pharyngeal tube length External buccal tube width
|
36.5 35.3 1.8 |
?? 1.8 |
39.0 32.9 1.8 |
38.6 34.5 1.9 |
40.4 30.7 2.9 |
pt
pt
stylet supports insertion point Pharyngeal bulb length
|
8.9 65.7 28.4 |
8.5 63.9 29.0 |
8.6 65.5 30.3 |
8.8 63.2 31.1 |
13.9 70.7 31.2 |
Pharyngeal bulb width First macroplacoid pt |
20.9 3.9 19.2 |
? 4.5 21.1 |
21.8 4.0 19.0 |
22.4 4.3 19.8 |
24.3 4.5 21.5 |
Second macroplacoid pt Third macroplacoid |
4.1 20.2 6.1 |
4.5 21.1 6.1 |
4.0 19.0 6.5 |
4.7 21.7 7.3 |
4.5 21.5 7.3 |
pt Placoid row pt |
30.0 14.5 71.4 |
28.6 15.4 72.3 |
31.0 14.6 69.5 |
33.6 17.3 79.7 |
34.9 16.3 78.0 |
External claw I pt % Main branch/ total claw length |
10.1 49.7 75.2 |
10.5
49
.
3
75.9
|
10.2 48.6 75.4 |
10.7 49.3 74.1 |
8.5 40.7 76.5 |
Internal claw I pt External claw II |
7.3 36.0 12.6 |
7.3 34.3 12.8 |
7.5 35.7 12.7 |
7.3 33.6? |
5.7 27.3 8.9 |
pt % Main branch/ total claw length Internal claw II pt |
62.1 74.6 8.8 43.3 |
60.1 74.1 8.8 41.3 |
60.5 74.0 9.1 43.3 |
?? 9.4 43.3 |
42.6 74.2?? |
External claw III pt % Main branch/ total claw length |
12.0 59.1 73.4 |
12.7 59.6 74.0 |
12.7 60.5 74.0 |
13.0 59.9 72.2 |
??? |
Internal claw III pt Posterior claw IV |
?? 15.6 |
9.2 43.2? |
9.1 43.3? |
8.9 41.0? |
6.5 31.1? |
pt % Main branch/total claw length Anterior claw IV |
76.8 79.3 9.8 |
??? |
?? 10.0 |
?? 9.7 |
?? 6.6 |
pt |
48.3 |
? |
47.6 |
44.7 |
31.6 |
TABLE 2.
Morphological measurements for three specimens of
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
(holotype and paratypes), the holotype of
Adropion arduifrons
(according to Thulin 1928), and the ranges for the West Spitsbergen
Adropion arduifrons
(according to Dastych 1985). Measurements are given in µm, with the
ms
and
cph
index values for relevant structures.
Adropion
|
vexatum
sp. nov.
|
A. arduifrons
*
|
A. arduifrons
**
|
No. slide |
5757 paratype |
5755 holotype |
5754 paratype |
holotype |
Body length |
255 |
302 |
316 |
284 |
118–170 |
Pharyngeal bulb length |
28.4 |
30.3 |
31.1 |
35.9 |
16–22 |
ms |
111.4 |
100.3 |
98.4 |
126 |
129.4–135.6 |
Pharyngeal bulb width |
20.9 |
21.8 |
22.4 |
19.7 |
10.5–14.0 |
cph |
73.6 |
71.9 |
72.0 |
55 |
63.1–65.0 |
External buccal tube width |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.0–1.2 |
cph |
6.3 |
5.9 |
6.1 |
4.7 |
5.4–6.3 |
Pharyngeal tube length |
35.3 |
32.9 |
34.5 |
about 35 |
28–36 |
cph |
124.3 |
108.6 |
110.9 |
99 |
147–175 |
Placoid row |
14.5 |
14.6 |
17.3 |
19.7 |
9–14 |
ms |
56.9 |
48.3 |
54.7 |
? |
76.3–82.4 |
cph |
51.1 |
48.2 |
55.6 |
55 |
56.2–66.6 |
Posterior claw IV |
15.6 |
? |
? |
12.8 |
5.0–7.5 |
ms |
61.2 |
? |
? |
45.1 |
42.4–44.1 |
cph |
54.9 |
? |
? |
35.7 |
31.2–34.1 |
* according to
Thulin 1928
** according to
Dastych 1985
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
differs from
Adropion montigenum
by having rod-shaped macroplacoids (these are oval granules in
Adropion montigenum
); the macroplacoid row length is about half the pharyngeal bulb length (48.2–55.6%) while in
Adropion montigenum
it is about 34%, and the claw shape differs, the basal common portion and the secondary branch being longer (
Figs. 4C
and
5C, D
).
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
is similar, but not identical, to
Adropion arduifrons
.
Unfortunately, the original description of
Adropion arduifrons
(
Thulin, 1928
)
, was not very detailed. We have attempted to find the
holotype
but it seems to be lost, as kindly communicated by Prof. Kristensen (University of Copenhagen,
Denmark
) and Dr. Ekström (University of Lund,
Sweden
). It is, therefore, necessary to refer to Thulin’s (1928) original description with additional information from
Dastych (1985)
, and we were also able to examine three specimens (kindly given by Dastych). For these comparisons it was necessary to use indices as defined by Thulin and Dastych, which are
ms
(the length of a structure as a ratio with respect to the body length), and
cph
(the percent ratio of a structure with respect to the pharyngeal bulb length). Unfortunately, these ratios of body length and pharyngeal bulb length can be influenced by the compression exerted by the coverslip; though if the comparative difference between two values is very high, it may be considered significant.
The new species differs from
Adropion arduifrons
(as described by
Thulin 1928
) in a number of characters: the pharyngeal bulb has a different shape and is shorter with respect to the body length in
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
, in fact the
ms
index is
98.4–111.4 in
the new species (a
paratype
of uncertain body length has been excluded), and
126 in
Adropion arduifrons
; the pharyngeal bulb also has a clearly different ratio length/width (the index
cph
of the pharyngeal bulb width is
71.9–73.6 in
the new species,
55 in
Adropion arduifrons
); the pharyngeal tube is clearly longer than the pharyngeal bulb, whereas
Thulin (1928)
specified that it is almost as long as the pharyngeal bulb; the claws are slightly longer with respect to both pharyngeal and body length (the
cph
index value of the posterior claw IV is
c
.
55 in
the new species, and
35.7 in
Adropion arduifrons
;
the
ms
index
c
.
61 in
the new species, and
45 in
Adropion arduifrons
) (
Table 2
).
Dastych (1985)
considered some specimens collected in Spitsbergen as belonging to the species
Diphascon arduifrons
, but specified that his specimens differed from
Adropion arduifrons
in, “having more rounded pharynx, longer placoid row, a little longer mouth tube and pharyngeal one and longer claws in regard to the pharynx length”. The specimens studied by Dastych were 118–170 µm long and he hypothesized that: “All these differences may be result from unlike body dimension of the
holotype
(284 µm – comp. Thulin l.c.) and compared specimens”.
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
differs from
Adropion arduifrons
as described by
Dastych (1985)
, by having larger body size; more rounded pharyngeal bulb; buccal tube shorter with respect to the pharyngeal bulb (
cph
index
108.6–124.3 in
the new species
147–175 in
the specimens studied by Dastych); shorter placoid row with respect to both the pharyngeal bulb length and to the body length (
Table 2
), and longer claws with respect to both the pharyngeal bulb length and to the body length (
Table 2
).
In conclusion, a number of characters distinguish our specimens of
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
from the descriptions of
Adropion arduifrons
,
provided by both
Thulin (1928)
and by
Dastych (1985)
, and from all the other species of the genus. We therefore believe
Adropion vexatum
sp. nov.
is a valid new species and addition to the Sicilian fauna.
Etymology:
The specific name (
vexatum
= vexed) refers to the difficulty to be recognized as new species, and described, as a consequence of the problem regarding comparisons with
Adropion arduifrons
.