A new species of Stolephorus (Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Bay of Bengal India
Author
Pavan-Kumar, Annam
Author
Jahageerdar, Shrinivas
Author
Jaiswar, A. K.
text
Zootaxa
2020
2020-02-27
4743
4
561
574
journal article
10.11646/zootaxa.4743.4.6
c0a630de-82d2-409d-ab59-8b2bf26ae428
1175-5326
3690639
03C03264-B7BD-4B88-8946-F23E99BD8A78
Stolephorus tamilensis
sp. nov.
Proposed common name: Tamil anchovy (
Fig. 2
)
Holotype
: ZSI F12077/2 (
50.85 mm
SL),
Thoothukudi
fish landing centre,
Tamil Nadu
,
India
(
8.7642° N
,
78.1348° E
),
18 February 2015
.
Paratypes
:
All
paratypes
from
Thoothukudi
fish landing centre,
Tamil Nadu
,
India
, (
8.7642° N
,
78.1348° E
), (
Fig. 1
)
18 February 2015
:
BNHS
MF 10-12
(
3 specimens
,
48.48–51.16 mm
SL),
CIFE-FRM 945–971
(
27 specimens
,
47.37–53.64 mm
SL) collected by
Shardul S. Gangan
on
18 February 2015
.
FIGURE 2.
Stolephorus tamilensis
sp. nov.
,
ZSI F12077/2 (50.85 mm SL), Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, India.
FIGURE 3.
Indented, concave preoperculum and maxilla position in
Stolephorus tamilensis
sp. nov.
,
CIFE/945 (51 mm SL), Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Diagnosis.
A species of
Stolephorus
with the following combination of characters: relatively deep-bodied fish, 19.87–23.37% SL (mean 21.2%); eye relatively large, eye diameter 29.28–35.85% HL (mean 32.09%); posterior margin of preopercle indented; gill rakers
15–19 in
upper series on first gill arch, 25–28 on in lower series,
40–47 in
total; posterior tip of longest pectoral-fin ray not reaching pelvic-fin origin, pelvic-fin relatively short, 5.81–8.15% SL (mean 7.39%); no pre-dorsal spines and post-pelvic scutes, pre-pelvic scutes 5–6; dorsal-fin base length 13.85– 15.54% in SL (mean 14.57%); dorsal-fin origin is closer to base of caudal fin than to tip of snout; length from dorsal-fin origin to anal-fin origin 20.91–22.57 % in SL (mean 21.87%); anal-fin rays 17–19; numerous melanophores on dorsum and suborbital area.
Description.
Body cylindrical, laterally compressed. Dorsal profile of head and body slightly convex from snout tip to dorsal fin origin, somewhat straight from the last point to caudal peduncle. Ventral profile of head and body is convex from anterior lower jaw tip to base of pelvic-fin, slightly concave from post pelvic fin to anal-fin origin. Posterior margin of pre- opercule concave, indented. Numerous melanophores on dorsum and suborbital area. Somewhat straight from posterior end of anal-fin to origin of lower caudal-fin lobe. Caudal peduncle slightly deep than longer. Vertebrae 39–40 (two specimens examined). Belly covered with 5–6 sharp needle-like scutes anterior to pelvic-fin insertion. Pelvic-fin without spine. Pre-dorsal and post-pelvic scutes absent.
Snout long, rounded, its length less than eye diameter. Mouth sub-terminal, extending backward beyond posterior margin of eye. Posterior end of the upper jaw rounded reaching to border of operculum. Lower jaw slender, extending beyond vertical through posterior margin of eye. Teeth pointed, small, slender, arranged in a single row in the pre maxilla, maxilla and lower jaw. Eye large, round, covered with adipose eye lid, positioned laterally on head dorsal to horizontal through pectoral-fin insertion, visible in dorsal view. Orbit elliptical. Nostrils close to each other, anterior to orbit. Inter orbital width less than eye diameter.
Dorsal-fin rays ii–iii + 15, origin closer to base of caudal-fin than to tip of snout. Pair of pigment line in front of dorsal-fin as well as between caudal-fin and dorsal-fin is absent. Anal-fin rays iii + 17–19, its origin at vertical through middle of the dorsal-fin. Pectoral-fin rays I + 13, posterior tip of longest pectoral-fin ray not reaching pelvic-fin origin, pectoral-fin axillary scale found in some specimens but in the remained it was absent, may be lost during collection. Pelvic-fin rays i–ii + 7, longest pectoral-fin rays not reaching vertical through to base of dorsal-fin. Caudal-fin forked, upper and lower lobes of caudal-fin well-developed. Gill rakers long and thin on first branchial arch, 15 –19 on the upper arch, 25–28 on lower arch (
Table 4
).
TABLE 2.
Morphometric data for
Stolephorus tamilensis
(N = 30). Range includes
holotype
and
paratypes
. SD = Standard Deviation.
Parameter
|
Holotype
|
Paratypes
|
Mean ± SD
|
Standard Length (mm) |
50.85 |
47.37–53.64 |
50.28 ± 1.59 |
Percent SL
|
Dorsal fin base length |
13.85 |
13.85–15.54 |
14.57 ± 0.44 |
Dorsal fin origin to anal fin origin |
21.56 |
20.91–22.57 |
21.87 ± 0.45 |
Anal fin base length |
18.70 |
17.61–20.03 |
18.73 ± 0.63 |
Pelvic fin base length |
1.84 |
1.52–2.04 |
1.92 ± 0.11 |
Pelvic fin length |
7.41 |
5.81–8.15 |
7.39 ± 0.66 |
Pectoral fin length |
14.03 |
12.89–15.44 |
14.15 ± 0.61 |
Pectoral fin base length |
2.48 |
2.20–3.18 |
2.59 ± 0.26 |
Tip of snout to dorsal fin length |
53.36 |
51.90–55.22 |
53.40 ± 0.78 |
Tip of snout to anal fin length |
61.15 |
58.82–63.16 |
61.08 ± 0.96 |
Tip of snout to pelvic fin length |
43.13 |
40.68–43.74 |
42.45 ± 0.82 |
Tip of snout to pectoral fin length |
21.60 |
21.60–24.03 |
22.90 ± 0.60 |
Maximum body depth |
21.28 |
19.87–23.37 |
21.20 ± 0.71 |
Length from base of pectoral fin to pelvic Fin |
20.46 |
18.71–23.01 |
20.89 ± 0.91 |
Length from base of pectoral fin to anal fin |
37.91 |
37.51–42.59 |
39.50 ± 1.22 |
Length from base of pelvic fin to anal fin |
18.54 |
17.52–20.35 |
18.89 ± 0.70 |
Head length |
22.46 |
21.44–25.21 |
22.65 ± 0.75 |
Percent HL
|
Snout length |
18.29 |
17.41–21.56 |
18.98 ± 1.02 |
Eye diameter |
33.01 |
29.28–35.85 |
32.09 ± 1.64 |
Post orbital head length |
44.25 |
43.56–49.28 |
46.61 ± 1.73 |
Inter orbital width |
25.61 |
22.36–30.76 |
26.64 ± 1.92 |
Upper jaw length |
74.65 |
64.44–76.72 |
71.83 ± 2.34 |
Lower jaw length |
61.32 |
55.55–64.76 |
61.05 ± 2.03 |
Colour.
Colour of thirty specimens of
Stolephorus tamilensis
sp. nov.
in fresh condition silvery whitish, very faint silvery stripe running along the lateral side; small dark pigment line running along upper border of anal fin.
Distribution.
Based on the collection of voucher specimens from present study, the
type
locality of
Stolephorus tamilensis
sp. nov.
is Thoothukudi,
Tamil Nadu State
of
India
8.7642° N
,
78.1348° E
. Probably this species is distributed in Gulf of Mannar and along the
Tamil Nadu State
coast.
Etymology.
The species is named as “
tamilensis
” with reference to the
Tamil Nadu
, a state of
India
, the
type
locality of the species.
Comparisons.
Stolephorus tamilensis
differs from congeners except
S. dubiosus
,
S. baganensis
,
S. bengalensis
,
S. carpenteriae
,
S. tri
,
S. ronquilloi
,
S. holodon
,
and
S. andhraensis
by the hind boarder of the pre-operculm concave (
vs.
rounded in
S. indicus
,
S. commersonnii
,
S. waitei
,
S. chinensis
,
S. multibranchus
,
S. brachycephalus
,
S. advenus
,
S. nelsoni
,
S. apiensis
,
S. pacificus
,
S. continentalis
,
S. insignus
and
S. oceanicus
). The new species also distinguishes from
S. dubiosus
,
S. tri
and
S. baganensis
by the absence of pre-dorsal spine (
vs.
presence). Furthermore,
S. tamilensis
can be distinguished from
S. andhraensis
by the absence of scattered pigments between dorsal-fin and caudal peduncle (
vs.
presence). In addition,
Stolephorus tamilensis
is also distinct from
S. andhraensis
,
S. ronquilloi
,
S. tri
,
S. multibranchus
,
S. brachycephalus
,
S. apiensis
,
S. pacificus
,
S. insignus
,
S. continentalis
,
S. teguhi
,
S. baganensis
,
S. waitei
,
S. chinensis
,
S. bataviensis
,
S. baweanensis
,
S. bengalensis
and
S. oceanicus
by 25–28 gill rakers on the lower limb of the first gill arch (
vs
.
20–21 in
S. andhraensis
,
28–30 in
S. ronquilloi
,
18–22 in
S. tri
,
32–35 in
S. multibranchus
,
20–22 in
S. brachycephalus
,
30–31 in
S. apiensis
,
35–38 in
S. pacificus
,
26–28 in
S. insignus
&
S. continentalis
,
41–46 in
S. teguhi
,
20–23 in
S. baganensis
,
23–25 in
S. waitei
,
20–25 in
S. chinensis
,
19–22 in
S. bataviensis
&
S. baweanensis
,
22–27 in
S. bengalensis
and
24–28 in
S. oceanicus
). The new species also differs from
S. commersonnii
,
S. multibranchus
,
S. brachycephalus
,
S. advenus
,
S. pacificus
,
S. teguhi
,
S. chinensis
,
S. insignus
,
S. bataviensis
and
S. bengalensis
by 5–6 needle like pre-pelvic scutes (
vs.
1–4 in
S. commersonnii
,
2–4 in
S. multibranchus
,
4–5 in
S. brachycephalus
,
7 in
S. advenus
,
1–4 in
S. pacificus
,
2–5 in
S. teguhi
,
4–7 in
S. chinensis
,
S. insignus
&
S. bataviensis
,
and
5–8 in
S. bengalensis
).
Stolephorus tamilensis
is distinguishable from
S. multibranchus
,
S. brachycephalus
,
S. carpentariae
,
S. advenus
,
S. teguhi
,
S. chinensis
,
S. bengalensis
and
S. insignus
by 17–19 anal fin rays (
vs.
18–20 in
S. multibranchus
,
19–22 in
S. brachycephalus
,
19–20 in
S. carpenteriae
,
16 in
S. advenus
,
19–21 in
S. teguhi
,
18–20 in
S. chinensis
,
16–19 in
S. bengalensis
and
18–19 in
S. insignus
).
Furthermore,
S. tamilensis
differs from
S. commersonnii
,
S. indicus
,
S. waitei
(
S. baweanensis
sensu Hata
et al
. 2019
),
S. insularis
(
S
.
bengalensis
sensu Hata
et al.
2019
),
S. baganensis
,
S. dubiosus
in eye diameter, dorsal fin base length, pelvic fin length, length between dorsal and anal-fin origins and maximum body depth (
Table 3
).
TABLE 3
.
The comparative ANOVA of transformed morphometric ratios of species of
Stolephorus
genus.
S. commersonnii
|
S. indicus
|
S. waitei
*
|
S. insularis
*
|
S. baganensis
|
S. dubiosus
|
S tamilensis
|
F-ratio |
p value |
SNL/HL |
Mean SD |
0.046190 ± 0.002246 |
0.058081 ± 0.003454 |
0.049800 ± 0.003447 |
0.037766 ± 0.004337 |
0.042993 ± 0.002949 |
0.040417 ± 0.002177 |
0.042775 ± 0.001798 |
191.450 |
0.000 |
HL/SL |
Mean SD |
0.242627 ± 0.004271 |
0.238745 ± 0.004729 |
0.253694 ± 0.005347 |
0.228759 ± 0.006581 |
0.227187 ± 0.006413 |
0.225029 ± 0.004740 |
0.225805 ± 0.005853 |
118.396 |
0.000 |
POHL/HL |
Mean SD |
0.131308 ± 0.003227 |
0.120148 ± 0.002786 |
0.128798 ± 0.003238 |
0.119573 ± 0.006617 |
0.123317 ± 0.007327 |
0.125276 ± 0.005056 |
0.105508 ± 0.004004 |
104.754 |
0.000 |
Mean |
0.067905 |
0.062456 |
0.063794 |
0.065279 |
0.059727 |
0.064029 |
0.060471 |
24.958 |
0.000 |
IOW/HL |
SD |
± 0.002954 |
± 0.002316 |
± 0.002730 |
± 0.003435 |
± 0.002793 |
± 0.003063 |
± 0.003086 |
ED/HL
|
Mean SD |
0.068823 ± 0.002317 |
0.064285 ± 0.002030 |
0.075894 ± 0.003867 |
0.069402 ± 0.003081 |
0.150193 ± 0.006462 |
0.061898 ± 0.002579 |
0.145680 ± 0.004360 |
3309.651
|
0.000 |
Mean |
0.168160 |
0.174433 |
0.196056 |
0.154415 |
0.169613 |
0.173783 |
0.162275 |
132.015 |
0.000 |
UJL/HL |
SD |
± 0.005092 |
± 0.004715 |
± 0.006350 |
± 0.008832 |
± 0.009174 |
± 0.005717 |
± 0.004225 |
Mean |
0.139017 |
0.134973 |
0.155936 |
0.130781 |
0.140920 |
0.140366 |
0.138614 |
56.789 |
0.000 |
LJL/HL |
SD |
± 0.003881 |
± 0.005516 |
± 0.004402 |
± 0.008468 |
± 0.007459 |
± 0.006323 |
± 0.004147 |
...Continued next page
TABLE 3.
(Continued)
S. commersonnii
|
S. indicus
|
S. waitei
*
|
S. insularis
*
|
S. baganensis
|
S. dubiosus
|
S tamilensis
|
F-ratio |
p value |
Mean |
0.151532 |
0.142881 |
0.154491 |
0.142806 |
0.241402 |
0.144190 |
0.219116 |
1121.405
|
0.000 |
DFBL/SL
|
SD |
± 0.005939 |
± 0.005463 |
± 0.004583 |
± 0.004759 |
± 0.010471 |
± 0.007646 |
± 0.003913 |
Mean |
0.199283 |
0.179706 |
0.204569 |
0.190184 |
0.216204 |
0.220501 |
0.187256 |
138.340 |
0.000 |
AFBL/SL |
SD |
± 0.005452 |
± 0.008258 |
± 0.006973 |
± 0.006174 |
± 0.008219 |
± 0.007920 |
± 0.006286 |
Mean |
0.0154 |
0.0135 |
0.0130 |
0.0205 |
0.0193 |
0.0267 |
0.0194 |
130.719 |
0.000 |
PFBL/SL |
SD |
± 0.00121 |
± 0.00077 |
± 0.00165 |
± 0.00212 |
± 0.00196 |
± 0.00542 |
± 0.00079 |
Mean |
0.0998 |
0.0764 |
0.0669 |
0.0868 |
0.1049 |
0.1029 |
0.0745 |
288.548
|
0.000 |
PLFL/SL
|
SD |
± 0.00460 |
± 0.00265 |
± 0.00220 |
± 0.00443 |
± 0.00830 |
± 0.00634 |
± 0.00545 |
Mean |
0.1438 |
0.1332 |
0.1452 |
0.1279 |
0.1592 |
0.1680 |
0.1404 |
77.926 |
0.000 |
PTFL/SL |
SD |
± 0.00680 |
± 0.00544 |
± 0.00898 |
± 0.01058 |
± 0.01438 |
± 0.01047 |
± 0.00411 |
Mean |
0.0375 |
0.0402 |
0.0385 |
0.0349 |
0.0356 |
0.0388 |
0.0254 |
98.446 |
0.000 |
PTBL/SL |
SD |
± 0.00474 |
± 0.00073 |
± 0.00188 |
± 0.00346 |
± 0.00390 |
± 0.00265 |
± 0.00208 |
Mean |
0.5278 |
0.5340 |
0.5341 |
0.5295 |
0.5208 |
0.5236 |
0.5328 |
10.515 |
0.000 |
TSDF/SL |
SD |
± 0.00656 |
± 0.00787 |
± 0.00635 |
± 0.00987 |
± 0.01229 |
± 0.00884 |
± 0.00634 |
Mean |
0.6298 |
0.6130 |
0.6120 |
0.6252 |
0.6209 |
0.6247 |
0.6099 |
15.457 |
0.000 |
TSAF/SL |
SD |
± 0.00851 |
± 0.00879 |
± 0.01108 |
± 0.01236 |
± 0.01392 |
± 0.01591 |
± 0.00724 |
Mean |
0.4441 |
0.4303 |
0.4411 |
0.4477 |
0.4235 |
0.4285 |
0.4264 |
22.968 |
0.000 |
TSPF/SL |
SD |
± 0.00547 |
± 0.01167 |
± 0.01448 |
± 0.00643 |
± 0.01355 |
± 0.01240 |
± 0.00589 |
TSPTF/ |
Mean |
0.2483 |
0.2466 |
0.2588 |
0.2446 |
0.2352 |
0.2316 |
0.2298 |
86.864 |
0.000 |
SL |
SD |
± 0.00511 |
± 0.00593 |
± 0.00537 |
± 0.00437 |
± 0.00966 |
± 0.00753 |
± 0.00490 |
Mean |
0.2319 |
0.2014 |
0.2188 |
0.2320 |
0.2268 |
0.2616 |
0.2116 |
231.403
|
0.000 |
AFDL/SL
|
SD |
± 0.00396 |
± 0.00417 |
± 0.00518 |
± 0.00638 |
± 0.01190 |
± 0.01342 |
± 0.00536 |
Mean |
0.2149 |
0.1921 |
0.2049 |
0.2276 |
0.0675 |
0.2468 |
0.0729 |
2471.632
|
0.000 |
MBD/SL
|
SD |
± 0.00503 |
± 0.00576 |
± 0.006740 |
±0.00687 |
± 0.00367 |
± 0.01456 |
± 0.00255 |
BPTFPL/ |
Mean |
0.2075 |
0.1906 |
0.1919 |
0.2162 |
0.2043 |
0.2049 |
0.2099 |
26.516 |
0.000 |
SL |
SD |
± 0.00510 |
± 0.01001 |
± 0.01428 |
± 0.01054 |
± 0.01424 |
± 0.01406 |
± 0.00631 |
BPTFAF/ |
Mean |
0.3970 |
0.3786 |
0.3658 |
0.4039 |
0.4039 |
0.4042 |
0.3943 |
38.602 |
0.000 |
SL |
SD |
± 0.00922 |
± 0.00693 |
± 0.01496 |
± 0.01303 |
± 0.02193 |
± 0.01860 |
± 0.01091 |
BPLFAF/ |
Mean |
0.1937 |
0.1854 |
0.1798 |
0.1898 |
0.2021 |
0.2046 |
0.1889 |
20.902 |
0.000 |
SL |
SD |
± 0.00535 |
± 0.00886 |
± 0.01686 |
± 0.00952 |
± 0.00919 |
± 0.01049 |
± 0.00704 |
*
S. waitei
(
Stolephorus baweanensis
sensu Hata
et al
. 2019
), *
S. insularis
(
S. bengalensis
sensu Hata
et al
. 2019
)
Note:
standard length or SL, snout length SNL (1), head length HL (2), postorbital head length POHL (3), interorbital width IOW (4), eye diameter ED (5), upper jaw length UJL (6), lower jaw length LJL (7), dorsal-fin base length DFBL (8), anal-fin base length AFBL (9), pelvic-fin base length PFBL (10), pelvic-fin length PLFL (11), pectoral-fin base length PTBL (12), pectoral fin long filament length PTFL (13), length from tip of snout to origin of dorsal fin TSDF (14), length from tip of snout to origin of anal fin TSAF (15), length from tip of snout to origin of pelvic fin TSPF (16), length from tip of snout to origin of pectoral fin TSPTF (17), length from origin of dorsal fin to origin of anal fin AFDL (18), maximum body depth MBD (19), length from base of pectoral fin to origin of pelvic fin BPTFPL (20), length from base of pectoral fin to origin of anal fin BPTFAL (21), length from base of pelvic fin to origin of anal fin BPLFAF (22)
Statistical analysis of morphometric variables.
Higher F-ratio of more than 200 for ED/HL, DFBL/SL, PLFL/SL, AFDL/SL and MBD/SL reveal their better discrimination power than the other characters (
Table 3
). Herein, a higher F-value of 3309.651 and 2471.632 for ED/HL and MBD/SL, respectively, showed the importance of insertion point in species differentiation. However, comparative analysis showed overlapping meristic characters between
S. insularis
(
S. bengalensis
sensu Hata
et al.
2019
) and
S. tamilensis
(
Table 4
).