Catalogue of the Incini with the description of the first Archedinus species from Honduras (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae)
Author
Seidel, Matthias
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Viničná & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 19300 Prague, Czech Republic; & Corresponding author
Author
Arriaga-Varela, Emmanuel
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Viničná & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 19300 Prague, Czech Republic;
Author
Sousa, Rafael
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré 481, Ipiranga, 04263 - 000, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
text
Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae
2018
Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae
2018-09-10
58
2
389
405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/aemnp-2018-0031
journal article
5801
10.2478/aemnp-2018-0031
32dc2999-ebd8-496d-9c2b-5f0fb6bc8f69
1804-6487
4504878
0610B52C-FE2C-49F1-A16F-0B14881AF4F2
Inca bonplandi
(
Gyllenhal, 1817
)
Trichius bonplandi
Gyllenhal, 1817: 196
[original combination]
Inca serricollis
(partim):
GORY & PERCHERON (1833)
: 108
[
I. bonplandi
synonymized with
I. serricollis
ignoring priority]
Inca bonplandi
:
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
: 380
[new combination and resurrection of the senior synonym]
Ynca
bonplandi
:
LAPORTE (1840)
: 159
[combination with misspelled genus name]
Inca bomplandi
:
BRUCH (1911)
: 216
[incorrect subsequent spelling, unavailable name]
Inca tapujo
Perty, 1830
.
Junior subjective synonym.
Inca tapujo
Perty, 1830: 51
[original combination]. Synonymized with
I. serricollis
by
GORY & PERCHERON (1833: 108)
.
Ynca tapago
:
LAPORTE (1840)
: 159 [combination with misspelled genus name and incorrect subsequent spelling of specific epithet, unavailable name]
Inca tapayo
:
GORY & PERCHERON (1833)
: 108
, 401 [incorrect subsequent spelling, unavailable name]
Inca bonplandi
var.
tapujo
:
SCHENKLING (1922)
:4
[downgraded to variety, unjustified act]
Inca serricollis
LePeletier & Serville, 1828
.
Junior subjective synonym.
Goliath serricollis
:
DEJEAN (1821)
: 61
[
nomen nudum
, unavailable name]
Inca serricollis
LePeletier & Serville, 1828
[original combination].Synonymized with
I. bonplandi
and incorrectly treated as senior synonym by
GORY & PERCHERON (1833: 108)
; priority corrected by
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840: 380)
.
Ynca servicollis
:
LAPORTE (1840)
:159 [combination with misspelled genus name; incorrect subsequent spelling, unavailable name]
Goliathus fasciatus
Kirby, 1819
.
Junior subjective synonym.
Goliathus fasciatus
Kirby, 1819: 407
[original combination]. Synonymized by
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840: 380)
.
Inca fasciata
:
BLACKWELDER (1944)
: 260
[new combination, incorrect gender agreement]
Goliathus inscriptus
Kirby, 1819
.
Junior subjective synonym.
Goliathus inscriptus
Kirby, 1819: 407
[original combination]. Synonymized by
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840: 380)
.
Inca bonplandi
var.
inscriptus
:
SCHENKLING (1922)
: 4
[downgraded to variety, unjustified]
Inca bonplandi v. inscripta
:
BLACKWELDER (1944)
: 260
[incorrect gender agreement]
Goliathus tricuspis
Drapiez, 1820
.
Junior subjective synonym.
Goliathus tricuspis
Drapiez, 1820: 272
[original combination]. Synonymized by
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840: 380)
.
Types.
Inca bonplandi:
One
male
syntype
in NHRS and one female
syntype
in UUZM.
Inca tapujo:
Seven
specimens of
Inca bonplandi
are deposited in ZSM and could be
syntypes
of
I. tapujo
(
SCHERER 1983
)
.
Goliathus inscriptus
: One
male
syntype
in BMNH.
Goliathus faciatus
: one male
syntype
in BMNH. The types of
Inca serricollis
and
Goliathus tricuspis
were not located by us.
Locality records from literature.
ARGENTINA
:
JUJUY
(
BRUCH 1911
),
MISIONES
(
BRUCH 1911
,
RICHTER 1913
,
DI IORIO 2013
).
BOLIVIA
(
DI IORIO 2013
).
BRAZIL
(
GYLLENHAL 1817
;
KIRBY 1819
):
BRASILIA
(EVANGELISTA
NETO et al. 2017
),
MINAS GERAIS
(
PERTY 1830
,
PUKER et al. 2014
),
PARÁ
(
SCHULZ 1901
),
RIO DE JANEIRO
(
DRAPIEZ 1820
,
OHAUS 1900
,
COSTA et al. 1988
,
DI IORIO 2013
).
PARAGUAY
:
CAAGUAZÚ
(
DI IORIO 2013
),
ITAPÚA
(
DI IORIO 2013
).
Additional material examined.
ARGENTINA
:
MISIONES
:
2 ♁♁
1 ♀
(
NMPC
): Argentina, Misiones, Iguazú, xii.99; 1 ♁ (
NMPC
): Argentina, Misiones, Pozo Azul, xii.99; 1 ♁
1 ♀
(
MSPC
): Argentina, Misiones, San Pedro,
vii.2010
; 1 ♁
1 ♀
(
ARPC
): Argentina, Iguazu env.; 1 ♁
1 ♀
(
BCRC
):Argentina, Misiones, Mocona,
iv.1985
.
BRAZIL
:
BRASILIA
:
1♁ (
CEMT
): Brazil, Distrito Federal, Fazenda Água Limpa,
15°57ʹ26.0″S
,
47°56ʹ42.3″W
,Armd.Isca Abacaxi 1,
28.xii.2013
,Evangelista Neto, F.leg.;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Distrito Federal, Floresta Cabeça,
i.1957
, B. Pereira leg.;
1 ♀
(
CEMT
): Brazil, Distrito Federal, Fazenda Água Limpa,
15°57ʹ20.3″S
,
47°56ʹ41.5″W
, Armd. Isca Banana 12,
13.xi.2013
, Evangelista Neto, J.
ESPÍRITO SANTO
:
1♁
2♀♀
(
ZMUH
):Brazil, Espirito Santo;
1♀
(
DZUP
): Brazil, Espirito Santo, Linhares, (P. Sooretema),
xii.1969
, J. M. Lima leg. (
DZUP
273765).
MINAS GERAIS
:
1 ♀
(
NHRS
): Minas Geraes, Mar d. Espanha, J. Zikan leg.
PARANÁ
:
2 ♀♀
(
NMPC
): Paraná; 1 ♁ (
ZMUH
): Parana, Curitiba;
1 ♀
(
CEMT
): Brazil, Paraná, Londrina,
11.xii.1995
, J. Lopes leg.;
1 ♀
(
ZMUH
): Brazil, Parana, Lucena;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Brasil, Rolandia, Norte-Paraná,
iii.1951
, Dirings leg.
RIO DE JANEIRO
:
1 ♁
2 ♀♀
(
NMPC
):Rio de Janeiro,Havlasa leg;
1♀
(
MZSP
):Rio de Janeiro,Itatiaya,
700 m
,
17.i.1926
, J. F. Zikán leg.;
1 ♀
(
NMPC
): Rio de Janeiro; 1 ♁
1 ♀
(
NMPC
): Petrópolis;
1 ♀
(
NHRS
): Rio de Janeiro, Petropolis,
1.ii.1899
, F. Ohaus; 1 ♁ (
NHRS
): Rio de Janeiro, Corcovado,
9.i.1899
, F. Ohaus; F. Ohaus; 1 ♁ (
NHRS
): Rio de Janeiro, Corcovado,
9.i.1905
, F. Ohaus;
1 ♀
(
NHRS
): Rio de Janeiro, Petropolis,
2.ii.1899
, F.Ohaus; 1♁ (
NHRS
):Rio de Janeiro, Petropolis,
12.i.1899
, F. Ohaus; 1 ♁ (
NHRS
): Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaya,
27.xi.1926
, F. Ohaus.
RIO GRANDE DO SUL
:
1 ♀
(
PSPC
): Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul; 1 ♁
1 ♀
(
NMPC
): Rio Grande do Sul;
1 ♀
(
ARPC
): Brasil,Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Cruz; 1♁ (
ZMUH
):Brazil, P.Alegro; 1♁
1 ♀
(
ZMUH
): Rio Grande do Sul;
1 ♀
(
NHRS
): Sao Leopoldo, J W. Stahl leg.; 1 ♁ (
FZBRS
): Rio Grande do Sul, S. Luiz Gonzaga,
19.xii.1967
, A. C. M. Moraes, (Col. MCN 163. 471); 1 ♁ (
FZBRS
): Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Maria, (Cerrito),
11.ii.1994
, L. Witeck leg.(Col MCN 218853);
1 ♀
(
MZUEFS
): Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Vila Olivia,
20.ii.1950
, J. Becker leg. (#30589); 1 ♁ (
MZUEFS
): Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul,
14.ii.1950
, J. Becker leg.(#30598).
SANTA CATARINA
:
1♀
(
NMPC
):Santa Catarina.Fu[?] ke leg.;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Brasil, Blumenau, Bairro Garoia, Moro Spitzkopf,
iii.1962
;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Brasil, Santa Catarina, Joinville, Dirings leg.; 1 ♁ (
MZSP
): Santa Catarina, Nova Teotonio,
i.1949
, F. Plaumann leg.;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
):Santa Catarina,Rio Vermelho,
i.1958
, Dirings leg.;
1♀
(
BCRC
): Brazil, Sao Bento do Sul;
1 ♀
(
ZMUH
): Santa Catharina;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Brazil, Santa Catarina, Timbó,
viii.1963
, Dirings leg.
SÃO PAULO
:
1 ♁ (
MZUEFS
): Brazil, São Paulo, Aguas da Prata
27.ii.1969
, J. Becker leg. (#30592);1♁
1♀
(
NMPC
):São Paulo,Mráz leg.;1♁ (
UNSM
):Brazil,Sao Paulo,Itaici,
i.1960
,J.R.Neidoefer leg.;
1♀
(
MZSP
):São Paulo,Ypiranga;
1 ♀
(
CMNC
): Brazil, Sao Paulo, Capao Bonito,
ii.1946
, J. Guerin leg.;
1 ♀
(
ZMUH
): Brazil, Sao Paulo, 1917;
1 ♀
(
ZMUH
): Brazil, Sao Paulo;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Brasil, São Paulo, Piracicaba,
xi.1961
, K. Reichardt leg.;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
):São Paulo, São Sebastião, Praia Baraqueçaba,
2.iv.1963
, P.Araujo leg.;
1 ♀
(
MZSP
): Brazil, São Paulo, Sertãozinho, Res. Ecol. Augusto Ruschi,
21°10.520’S
,
48°5.47’W
,
529 m
,
07–21.xii.2011
. Malaise borda, V. C. Silva, P. F. Donda & G. P. Ignácio leg.
PARAGUAY
:
GUAIRÁ
:
1 ♁ (
NMPC
):Paraguay,Villarica,Kolonio Sudetica.
ITAPÚA
:
2♁♁
1♀
(
ARPC
): Paraguay, Encarnacion,
xii.1975
.
ITAQUIRI
:
1♀
(
DZUP
):Paraguai, Itaquiri,
400 m
,
15–20.i.1980
, Mielke & Miers leg. (
DZUP
273741).
SAN PEDRO
:
1 ♁
2 ♀♀
(
NMPC
): Paraguay, Carlos Pfannl,
i.1969
, José Andres lgt.
Remarks.
BLACKWELDER (1944)
erroneously attributed authorship of
Inca serricollis
to
GORY & PERCHERON (1833)
.
SCHENKLING (1922)
listed “
tapujo
”
and
“
inscriptus
”
as variations of
Inca bonplandi
(Gyllenhall, 1817)
, and there seems to be no evident justification for Schenkling’s listing.
KRAJCIK (1999)
incorrectly gave the year for
Inca tapujo
as 1834 and not 1830.
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
stated that
Goliathus inscriptus
Kirby, 1819
only represents an “insignificant variety” and later
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1841)
added that it is only a darker variant of
Inca bonplandi
.
Goliathus fasciatus
Kirby, 1819
and
Goliathus tricuspis
Drapiez, 1820
were listed by
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
as synonyms of
Inca bonplandi
without further comment.
DI IORIO (2013)
interpreted the synonymical listing of
Goliath fasciatus
and
Goliath inscriptus
under
Inca bonplandi
only as a reference, but we acknowledge that
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
established these synonymies.
SCHAUM (1849)
stated that the
type
of
Goliathus fasciatus
Kirby, 1819
only represents a “slight variation” of
Inca bonplandi
. He clearly intended to keep Kirby’s species in synonymy.
BLACKWELDER (1944)
unjustifiably emended and combined the name to
Inca fasciata
. Both,
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
and
LAPORTE (1840)
resurrected
Inca bonplandi
as valid name over the junior synonyms, but
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
was published in July–September 1840 (
BOUSQUET 2012
), whereas
LAPORTE (1840)
was published as earliest as on
26 December 1840
(
BOUSQUET 2016
). Therefore,
BURMEISTER & SCHAUM (1840)
deserve credit for the resurrection.