Lost and found: the Plecoptera types of Blanchard and Mabille, with further contributions to the stoneflies of Chile Author Murányi, Dávid Author Gamboa, Maribet Author Vera, Alejandro text Zootaxa 2016 4200 4 544 560 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.4200.4.6 97399c50-0fc4-42d6-b62c-cb85bd72d0bf 1175-5326 191677 DCE541D0-8DC7-4CEC-BA5A-EA1015F0C1F2 Neonemura stictica ( Blanchard, 1851 ) , comb. n. , nomen dubium ( Figs. 21–23 ) Perla stictica Blanchard, 1851 — Blanchard 1851 : 100 . (original description of the adult); Claassen 1940 : 146 . (catalog); Illies 1964b : 209 . (nomen nudum); Illies 1966 : 508 . (nomen dubium); Froehlich 2010 : 187 . (catalog, nomen dubium); DeWalt et al. 2016 (catalog, nomen dubium). Forca sitctica (sic!) ( Blanchard, 1851 )— Hallan 2006 (catalog, nomen dubium). Material examined. LECTOTYPE ♀ , present designation: CHILE ( NMPC , transferred to alcohol vial) (Labels, kept in box IV.17 : Museum Paris / Chili / Gay 15-43 (printed); 15 / 43 (handwritten round label); Type (red, printed)). Remarks. In the original box, there were three specimens pinned together as types of P. stictica . The three species lack a locality label, “Valdivia” as indicated in the original description. The specimen bearing an identification label with Blanchard's handwriting was detached from the plastic sheet, the second specimen is a Gripopterygidae fragment as indicated above, the third specimen is a female in relatively good condition and designated as the lectotype . Females of two recently described Neonemura Navás, 1919 species remained unknown ( Vera 2008 , Stark & Morse 2013 ), thus, the specific identity of N. stictica is doubtful and should be treated as a nomen dubium. Regarding to the known females of valid Neonemura species, the lectotype resembling N. barrosi Navás, 1919 ( Figs. 21–23 ).