Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae) Author Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. text Zootaxa 2023 2023-02-07 5238 1 1 134 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1 journal article 53418 10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1 751096f2-4b5b-43c3-9748-4d07afe044c3 1175-5326 7621793 768E9932-2D18-4115-8359-3FF800328BCD Chloeia candida Kinberg, 1857 Indeterminable Chloeia candida Kinberg, 1857: 11 , 1910: 33 , Pl. 11, Fig. 2A–G ; Baird 1868: 231 ; Hartman 1949: 37 ; Hartman 1959: 131 ; Yáñez-Rivera & Salazar-Vallejo 2022: 529–530 (indeterm.). Remarks . The specific derivation is enigmatic; the Latin word candidus ( a, um ) means white. However, the illustration for the dorsal view of a complete specimen ( Kinberg 1910 , Pl. 11, Fig. 2A ) shows a middorsal dark spot, resembling C. viridis Schmarda, 1861 . Hartman (1949: 37) regarded C. candida as a juvenile of C. viridis Schmarda, 1861 . This might imply a need to call for a reversal of priority. However, because the species name was based on a juvenile, and the original description indicated bipinnate branchiae were present from chaetiger 2, it was regarded as indeterminable ( Yáñez-Rivera & Salazar-Vallejo 2022 ).