Lectotypification of 16 names in Rubus subg. Idaeobatus, 12 names in R. subg. Malachobatus, and 1 name in R. subg. Chamaebatus (Rosaceae) Author Idrees, Muhammad 0000-0001-7031-7247 College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641000, Sichuan, China & idreesbiotech @ yahoo. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 7031 - 7247 idreesbiotech@yahoo.com Author Zhang, Zhiyong 0000-0003-4533-1789 College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641000, Sichuan, China & zhangzyong 219 @ 126. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 4533 - 1789 text Phytotaxa 2022 2022-08-19 559 1 13 24 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 journal article 124888 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2 007d42e0-65f9-4fa1-84f7-e3013a33d03d 1179-3163 7009287 29. Rubus ourosepalus Cardot (1917: 290) Type ( lectotype designated here ):— W . CHINA . July 1903 , E.H.Wilson 3484 (barcode P00755302!, isolectotypes: A00040689!, A00133085!). [Image available at http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00755302] . Note :—In the protologue, Cardot (1917) described Rubus ourosepalus and cited “ Wilson 1903; Veitch Exped. 3484 ” as the type, but did not indicate where the type preserved. Since then, no author has designated a lectotype , even inadvertently (Art. 7.11, Turland et al . 2018 ). According to Stafleu and Mennega (1995) , Cardot’ original materials were deposited at P. We locate three duplicates, two of them deposited in A (barcode 00040689 and 00133085), and one of them in P (barcode 00755302). All these collections should be regarded as syntypes (Arts. 9.6, and 40 Note 1, Turland et al. 2018 ); hence, a lectotype may be designated (Art. 9.12). We designate the sheet in P (barcode 00755302) as the lectotype , since it is morphological complete with the presence of stem, leaves, and flower that fully correspond with the protologue.