Recommendations on approving the name “ Entomosporium ”, with a new species, E. dichotomanthes from China (Leotiomycetes, Drepanopezizaceae) Author Yang, Hong De Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Natural Medicines, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China & Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand Author Jayawardena, Ruvishika S. 0000-0001-7702-4885 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand Author Zeng, Xiang Yu School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand Author Thiyagaraja, Vinodhini 0000-0002-8091-4579 Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Natural Medicines, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China Author Zhao, Qi 0000-0001-8169-0573 Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Natural Medicines, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China Author Hyde, Kevin D. 0000-0002-2191-0762 Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Natural Medicines, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China & Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand text MycoKeys 2024 2024-07-10 107 1 20 journal article 299651 10.3897/mycokeys.107.121962 35d92975-fde5-4b26-84d7-4a0ab423e18b Drepanopezizaceae Baral Fig. 3 Type. Drepanopeziza (Kleb.) Jaap 1914 . Description. Sexual morph : Ascomata small-sized, up to 2 mm in diameter, apothecial, cupulate, margin often protruding, with or without lobes, sessile and mostly immersed. Excipulum is composed of cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses hyaline, thin-walled, aseptate or septate, apically swollen. Asci 4–8 - spored, clavate or cylindrical, apex obtuse to conical, with or without apical ring. Ascospores ellipsoid to fusoid, aseptate or 1–2 - septate. Asexual morph : Conidiomata solitary to gregarious or confluent, mostly epiphyllous, acervulus. Conidiogenesis holoblastic. Conidia hyaline, thin-walled. Morphology of genera in Drepanopezizaceae . Diplocarpon : a ascomata, b asci, paraphyses and ascospore ( a, b D. rosae , redraw from Wolf 1912 ) c acervulus and conidia ( D. rosae , redraw from Lee and Shin 2000 ), Entomosporium d ascomata e asci and paraphyses ( d, e E. maculatum , redraw from Stowell and Backus 1967 ) f acervulus g conidia ( f, g E. mespilicola , redraw from Chen et al. 2022 ), Drepanopeziza h ascomata ( Dr. populorum , redraw from Spiers and Hopcroft 1998 ) i asci, paraphyses and ascospore j conidiogenous cells and conidia ( i, j Dr. ribis , redraw from https://www.centrodeestudiosmicologicosasturianos.org ), Blumeriella k ascomata l asci, paraphyses and ascospore ( k, l B. haddenii , redraw from Williamson and Bernard 1988 ) m acervulus n conidia ( m, n B. jaapii , redraw from https://www.forestryimages.org ), Thedgonia o acervulus and conidia ( T. ligustrina , redraw from Crous et al. 2009 ) p Hymenula : conidiogenous cells and conidia ( H. gramineum redraw from Wiese and Ravenscroft 1978 ), Pseudopeziza q ascomata ( P. trifolii , redraw from Kirchner and Boltshauser 1987 ) r asci, paraphyses and ascospore ( P. ribis , redraw from https://www.pesticidy.ru/pathogens_genus/Pseudopeziza ). Notes. Drepanopezizaceae was described with sexual and asexual morphs. Both life morphs were found as parasitic on leaves of various dicotyledons, and rarely on herbaceous ( Johnston et al. 2019 ). The sexual morph is recognized by the cupulate, apothecial ascomata, and the paraphyses with swollen apical ( Harada et al. 1974 ; Williamson and Bernard 1988 ; Spiers and Hopcroft 1998 ). The asexual morph is acervular but varies in conidial shape among genera ( Crous et al. 2009 ; Khodadadi et al. 2022 ). The family name was first time used by Batista and Maia (1960) , but was invalid because of unavailable diagnosis or description ( Johnston et al. 2019 ). It was difficult to trace back the history of members accommodated in the family until Johnston et al. (2019) , validated the family name based on the phylogenetic analysis (Table 2 ). Main versions of classification of Drepanopezizaceae and its accepted genera.
Batista and Maia (1960) Wijayawardene et al. (2017) Johnston et al. (2019) Ekanayaka et al. (2019) Wijayawardene et al. (2022) Zhu et al. (2023) This study
The family name was used Blumeriella Erected the family Blumeriella Blumeriella Blumeriella Blumeriella Blumeriella
Diplocarpon Diplocarpon Diplocarpon Diplocarpon Diplocarpon Diplocarpon
Drepanopeziza Drepanopeziza Drepanopeziza Drepanopeziza Drepanopeziza Drepanopeziza
Felisbertia Felisbertia Felisbertia Felisbertia Felisbertia Entomosporium
Leptotrochila Leptotrochila Leptotrochila Leptotrochila Hymenula Felisbertia
Pseudopezicula Pseudopeziza Marssonina Pseudopeziza Leptotrochila Leptotrochila
Pseudopeziza Spilopodia Pseudopezicula Spilopodia Pseudopeziza Spilopodia
Spilopodia Spilopodiella Spilopodiella Spilopodiella Spilopodia Spilopodiella
Spilopodiella Thedgonia Spilopodia - Spilopodiella Thedgonia
- - Thedgonia - Thedgonia -
The taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis are labeled in bold.