Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae) Author Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. text Zootaxa 2023 2023-02-07 5238 1 1 134 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1 journal article 53418 10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1 751096f2-4b5b-43c3-9748-4d07afe044c3 1175-5326 7621793 768E9932-2D18-4115-8359-3FF800328BCD Chloeia pinnata Moore, 1911 Chloeia pinnata Moore, 1911: 239–243 , Pl. 15, Figs 1–6 ; Berkeley & Berkeley 1939: 323 ; Hartman 1940: 206–207 , Pl. 31, Figs 10–13 ; Hartman 1959: 132 ; Hartman 1963: 8 ; Loi 1980: 127 ; Kudenov 1995: 209–213 , Figs 7.1, 7.2 ; Barroso & Paiva 2011: 422 , Tab. 1; Yánez-Rivera & Salazar-Vallejo 2022: 521–523 , Figs 1B , 2 , 10 (redescr.). Chloeia rosea? : Fauvel 1943: 7 ( non Potts, 1909 ). Diagnosis . Chloeia with bipinnate branchiae from chaetiger 4, colorless, progressively smaller posteriorly; anterior eyes 2× larger than posterior ones; caruncle with about 10 folds; notochaetae furcates, without harpoon chaetae; neurochaetae spurred. Remarks . Chloeia pinnata Moore, 1911 was described from Southern California, and it has been redescribed elsewhere ( Yáñez-Rivera & Salazar-Vallejo 2022 ). It belongs in the group tumida by having bipinnate branchiae from chaetiger 4, progressively smaller posteriorly, and no pigmentation pattern. It resembles C. keablei sp. n. , described above with specimens from The Philippines to Australia , because both species have a tapered caruncle, and colorless bipinnate branchiae. However, these two species can be separated by the relative size of eyes, type of harpoon notochaetae, and neurochaetae. In C. pinnata , the anterior eyes are 2× larger than posterior ones, its harpoon notochaetae have spurs, and neurochaetae are spurred, whereas in C. keablei , anterior eyes are 4× larger than posterior ones, harpoon notochaetae have no spurs or smooth tines, and its neurochaetae are all furcates with small minor tines.