Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Egypt, with new records, descriptions of new species, and a key to species Author Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A. Author De, Gilberto J. text Zootaxa 2014 3865 1 1 71 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.3865.1.1 b2dd0f47-267c-41ae-a38e-c725a60ade4e 1175-5326 287144 CA1F0F7D-25A3-4084-8F2C-99AF9A45DFCC Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948 : 141 ; Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 668 ; Moraes et al ., 1986 : 70 ; 2004: 104; Swirski et al ., 1998 : 108 ; Beard, 2001 : 79 ; Denmark & Edland, 2002 : 209 ; Guanilo et al ., 2008c : 19 ; Papadoulis et al ., 2009 : 97 ; Ferragut et al ., 2010 : 78 ; Barbar et al ., 2013 : 253 . Lasioseius polonicus Willmann, 1949 : 117 . (synonymy by Nesbitt, 1951 : 36 ; not synonym according to Chant, 1959 : 61 ; Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 660 ). Typhlodromus ( Neoseiulus ) barkeri .— Nesbitt, 1951 : 35 ; Ehara, 1966 : 18 . Typhlodromus ( Typhlodromus ) barkeri .— Chant, 1959 : 61 . Typhlodromus ( Amblyseius ) barkeri . — Hughes, 1961 : 222 . Typhlodromus barkeri . — Hirschmann, 1962 : 2 ; Chant, 1965: 364. Amblyseius mckenziei Schuster & Pritchard, 1963 : 268 . (synonymy by Athias-Henriot, 1966 : 215 ; Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 668 ; Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 35 ). Amblyseius ( Amblyseius ) usitatus van der Merwe, 1965: 71. (synonymy by Ueckermann & Loots, 1988 : 148 ; Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 37 ). Amblyseius oahuensis ( Prasad, 1968 : 1518 ) . (synonymy by Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 668 ; Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 37 ). Amblyseius picketti Specht, 1968 : 681 . (synonymy by Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 669 ; Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 37 ). Amblyseius cydnodactylon (Shehata & Zaher, 1969: 177) . (synonymy by Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 668 ). Amblyseius mycophilus Karg, 1970 : 290 . (synonymy by Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 668 ; Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 37 ). Amblyseius ( Amblyseius ) barkeri . — Ehara, 1972 : 147 ; Ueckermann & Loots, 1988 : 147 ; Ehara et al ., 1994 : 124 . Amblyseius ( Amblyseius ) pieteri Schultz, 1972 : 17 . (synonymy by Ueckermann & Loots, 1988 : 148 ; not synonym, according to Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 37 ). Amblyseius barkeri . — Swirski et al ., 1973 : 70 ; Çobanoǧlu, 1989a : 55 ; Moraes et al ., 1989 : 95 ; Papadoulis & Emmanouel, 1991 : 53 ; Wu et al ., 1997 : 81 . Amblyseius masiaka Blommers & Chazeau, 1974 : 308 . (synonymy by Ueckermann & Loots, 1988 : 148 ; Chant & McMurtry, 2003 : 37 ). Amblyseius sugonjaevi Wainstein & Abbasova, 1974 : 796 . (synonymy by Ragusa & Athias-Henriot, 1983 : 669 ). Amblyseius ( Neoseiulus ) barkeri .— Karg, 1983 : 313 ; 1991: 22; 1993: 179; Ehara & Amano, 1998 : 34 . Neoseiulus kermanicus Daneshvar, 1987 : 14 . (synonymy by Faraji et al ., 2007 : 233 ). Female (six specimens). Dorsal shield mostly smooth, with sparse median reticulations anterior to J2 ; 345 (327–379) long and 183 (172–200) wide, with 17 pairs of setae. Setae j1 19 (15–20), j 3 25 (23–28), j4 20 (18–21), j5 18 (17–19), j6 20 (19–22), J2 25 (22–27), J5 13 (12–15), z2 23 (22–27), z4 24 (21–27), z5 20 (18–20), Z1 25 (23–28), Z4 38 (35–41), Z5 55 (51–62), s4 29 (25–32), S2 29 (26–30), S4 26 (24–27), S5 22 (21–23), r3 22 (17–25), R1 20 (14–26). Dorsal setae smooth, except Z5 , faintly serrate. Peritreme extending to region between j1 and j3 . Venter. Sternal shield mostly smooth, with few lateral striae, with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures. Distances between st1–st1 51 (49–55), st2–st2 63 (60–64), st3–st3 74 (69–82), st4–st4 66 (61–78). Genital shield mostly smooth, with lateral extensions; distance between st5–st5 59 (54–65). Ventrianal shield subpentagonal, mostly reticulate; 119 (115–123) long and 100 (93–106) wide at ZV2 level and 93 (83–99) wide at level of anus; with three pairs of pre-anal setae and a pair of pre-anal pores. Seta JV5 50 (47–55). Ventral setae smooth. Two pairs of metapodal plates. Spermatheca. Calyx of spermatheca tubular, flaring towards vesicle, 21 (20–22) long; atrium distinct. Gnathosoma. Corniculi parallel to each other; basal width of corniculus 5, distance between bases of corniculi 7. Movable cheliceral digit 33 (31–34) long, with one tooth; fixed digit 32 (31–33) long, with three teeth. Legs. Macroseta sharp-tipped: St IV 63 (60–65); chaetotaxy of genu II 2 , 2/0, 2/0, 1; genu III 1 , 2/0, 2/1, 1. Specimens examined. One female, formerly identified as A . cydnodactylon by M.A. Zaher, from soil under citrus tree, at Ashmoun, Monufia governorate, April 1977 (coll. M.A. Zaher); two females from soil, at Beheira governorate, July 2001 (coll. A.H.M. Romeih); six females from soil, at Demu Village, Senuris, Fayoum governorate, August and October 2006 , May–November 2012 (coll. R.I.A. Abo-Shnaf); one female from soil, at October 6 city, Giza governorate, October 2006 (coll. R.I.A. Abo-Shnaf); five females from soil, at the Faculty of Agriculture Farm, Cairo University, Giza governorate, September 2005 , February and May 2012 (coll. R.I.A. Abo- Shnaf); one female from soil, at Dokii, Giza governorate, May 2012 (coll. R.I.A. Abo-Shnaf); 20 females from soil, at Orman Botanical Garden, Giza governorate, May–November 2012 (coll. R.I.A. Abo-Shnaf); three females from soil, at Qualyubia governorate, July–September 2006 (coll. A.K. Nasr); three females from soil, at Sharkia governorate, April–July 2006 (coll. A.K. Nasr). Previous records from Egypt . as A . cydnodactylon —Alexandria and Giza governorates (Shehata & Zaher, 1969); as N . barkeri —Asyut, Beni Suef, Damietta, Monufia and Qualyubia governorates ( Nasr et al ., 2011 ); Fayoum and Giza governorates ( Romeih et al ., 2010b ). Remarks. Neoseiulus barkeri was originally described from the holotype female collected in England . The original description was detailed, with illustrations, but with no measurements; complementary descriptions were listed by Demite et al . (2014) . Amblyseius cydnodactylon was originally described from the holotype female, seven paratype females and six paratype males, collected in the Faculty of Agriculture Farm, Giza governorate, and Burg El Arab, Alexandria governorate, Egypt . The original description was quite detailed, with illustrations and setal measurements. Measurements of specimens examined in this work fit the corresponding ranges given by Ferragut et al . (2010) .