On the genus Cosmopelma Simon, 1889 (Araneae, Barychelidae) Author Mori, Andre Author Bertani, Rogerio text Zootaxa 2016 4137 4 520 534 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.4137.4.4 91a556ae-1ecc-462e-8304-f57d4cb6a14d 1175-5326 267111 C998CD33-D2CB-4F47-BF53-50ECD446B65C Cosmopelma decoratum Simon, 1889 ( Figs 1–19 , 36–37 , 39–41 . Tables 1–2 ) Cosmopelma decoratum Simon, 1889 : 217 ; 1892:128; Petrunkevitch, 1911 : 54 ; Mello-Leitão, 1923 : 123 ; Roewer, 1942 : 220 . Diagnosis. Females of C. decoratum can be distinguished by the absence of the D-shaped base of the spermathecae and the non-spiralled stalks connected to the receptacles ( Figs 36–37 ); males can be distinguished by the presence of cuspules on the maxillae ( Fig. 13 ), the absence of a megaspine on the tibiae I ( Fig. 16 ), and the thin, long and mostly straight embolus ( Figs 17–18 ). Type material. Holotype female, Brazil , State of Bahia, “Rio Salobro, now Santa Luzia ( 15°26'00.9"S , 39°19'44.0"W ), Gounelle col., MNHN AR8756 B.102, examined. Other material examined. BRAZIL : Bahia : Uruçuca, Fazenda Almada ( 14°35'44.6"S , 39°17'08.0"W ), 1 male , November 1977 , J. Santos ( CEPLAC 3793); 1 female , same date and collector ( CEPLAC 3780); 12 females , 2 immatures, Fazenda Santa Teresa ( 14°35'44.6"S , 39°17'08.0"W ), no futher data, ( MNRJ 12919, R2955). Redescription. Female. MNRJ 12919. Carapace 3.48 long, 3.06 wide. Abdomen 3.45 long, 2.61 wide. Total length 6.9. Carapace: Surface smooth. Thoracic striae faint, shallow. Caput slightly raised. Fovea short, shallow, slightly procurved. Eight eyes on reduced and low tubercle, 0.20 high, 0.91 wide, 0.45 long. Clypeus, 0.29 wide. MOQ 0.92 wide, 0.32 long. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior slightly recurved. AME, 0.15; ALE, 0.14; PME, 0.08; PLE, 0.16. Eye interspaces: AME-AME, 0.15; AME-ALE, 0.08; ALE-ALE, 0.61; PME-PLE, 0.04; PME-PME, 0.38; ALE-PLE, 0.02. Chelicerae: 1.53 long with very fine setae on pro- and retrolateral side. Seven teeth on promargin. Fangs pale at base, darkening distally, becoming light brown hue. Rastellum absent, distal edge with 8 dark thick setae. Labium: 0.25 long, 0.64 wide, with one row of fine setae anteriorly. Cuspules absent. Labiosternal groove shallow, flat, with pair of sigilla. Maxillae: 0.96 long in front, 1.42 behind, 0.74 wide, with 31 spiky cuspules ventrally on inner angle of both maxillae. Maxillary heel rounded, anterior lobe indistinct. Fine setae throughout surface, without dense patches. Lyra absent. Coxa I: 12 spiky cuspules ventrally on inner mound. Sternum: 1.74 long, 1.62 wide. Fine setae throughout surface, without dense patches. Three pairs of faint sigilla, circular, close to coxae of legs I, II and III, one diameter from sternum margin. Booklungs: semi-circular, with elliptical aperture; booklung combs not evident. Legs: formula IV I II III. Measurements in Table 1 . Spines: leg I: fe 0, pa 0, ti r1-1-1, me v2 -0-1(ap), ta 0; leg II: fe 0, pa 0, ti v1-2 -1, me v2 -0-1(ap), ta 0. Leg III: fe 0, pa 0, ti 0, me p0-0-1, v1 -0-2(ap), ta 0. Leg IV: fe 0, pa 0, ti 0, me v0-0-2(ap), ta 0; palp: fe 0, pa v0-1-0, ti v2-2 -2, ta 0. Preening combs absent. Few (4–7) clavate trichobothria on tarsi of all legs and palps, median-positioned. Claws: palpal claw without teeth, slightly longer than claw tuft. Paired claws without teeth on other legs, slightly longer than claw tuft. Claw tufts: dense on all legs and palp, slightly separated in two symmetrical parts. Scopulae: undivided, dense on tarsi of palp, metatarsi and tarsi of legs I and II, less dense on tarsi of legs III and IV. Spermathecae: two, with thin base, from which two receptacles branch; external receptacle large, rounded, connected by thick short stalk; internal receptacle thin, rod-shaped, connected by thin short stalk; stalks of inner receptacles very sclerotized. TABLE 1. Cosmopelma decoratum . Female, MNRJ 12919. Leg measurements, left side.

Tarsus	Metatarsus	Tibia	Patella	Femur	Total
Palp	0.87	–	0.88	1.14	1.73	4.62
Leg I	0.65	1.06	1.49	1.64	2.39	7.23
Leg II	0.65	1.05	1.45	1.56	2.36	7.07
Leg III	0.72	1.32	1.29	1.48	2.08	6.89
Leg IV	0.89	1.82	2.00	1.73	2.74	9.18

FIGURES 1–3. Cosmopelma decoratum Simon, 1889 , female holotype, MNHN AR8756 B.102. 1, habitus. 2, maxillae and coxae I, showing spiky cuspules. 3, palps and leg I, showing symmetric pattern of spines. Scale = 1 mm (1, 3), 0.5 mm (2). Spinnerets: PMS short, triangular, 0.33 long, 0.16 wide. Basal, middle, and apical segments of PLS 0.48 long, 0.41 wide, 0.14 long, 0.33 wide; 0.20 long, 0.23 wide, respectively; apical segment triangular with two pale bands: one basal and one apical. All segments covered by fine setae. Color pattern: chelicerae and carapace light brown, legs bicolored, with alternating pale and brown bands, abdomen dorsally bicolored, with distinctive symmetric pattern of pale and brown areas: 3 anterior pairs of bands separated by brown area in middle and 3 posterior bands undivided; ventrally pale. Description. Male. CEPLAC 3793. All characters as in female except: carapace 3.47 long, 3.23 wide. Abdomen 3.37 long, 2.38 wide. Total length 7.58. Eye tubercle 0.30 high, 0.84 wide, 0.44 long. Clypeus 0.18. MOQ 0.84 wide, 0.28 long. AME 0.20, ALE 0.15, PME 0.12, PLE 0.08. Eye interspaces: AME–AME, 0.17; AME–ALE, 0.07; ALE–ALE, 0.62; PME–PLE, 0.03; PME–PME, 0.69; ALE–PLE, 0.08. Chelicerae 1.06 long. Labium 0.19 long, 0.57 wide, without cuspules. Maxillae 0.94 long in front, 1.23 long behind, 0.44 wide, with 8 thin cuspules ventrally on inner angle. Coxae I: cuspules absent. Sternum: 1.87 long, 1.57 wide. Legs: Formula IV I II III. Measurements in Table 2 . Spines: leg I: fe 0, pa 0, ti r0-1-1, me v0-0-1, ta 0; leg II: fe 0, pa 0, ti v0-2-1, me r1-0-1(ap), ta 0. Leg III: fe 0, pa 0, ti 0, me p0-0-2 (1ap), r0-0-2(1ap), ta 0. Leg IV: fe 0, pa 0, ti, me, ta missing on both sides; palp: fe 0, pa 0, ti 0, ta 0. Scopulae entire on all tarsi of legs, absent on other segments. Tibial apophysis on leg I absent, with two regular spines instead. FIGURES 4–10. Cosmopelma decoratum , female, MNRJ 12919. 4, habitus. 5, ventral view. 6, low and reduced eye tubercle. 7, maxillae and coxae I, showing spiky cuspules. 8, 4 spinnerets, showing two pale bands on apical portion of PLS. 9, palps and legs I, showing symmetric pattern of spines. 10, left tarsus I, clavate trichobothria. Scales = 1 mm (4, 5, 7, 9), 0.5 mm (6, 8, 10). FIGURES 11–19. Cosmopelma decoratum , male, CEPLAC 3793. 11, habitus. 12, ventral view. 13, maxillae and coxae I, note few cuspules on maxillae, and none on coxae I. 14, eye tubercle. 15, four spinnerets, note two pale bands on apical article of PLS. 16, left tibia I, showing two spines instead of tibial apophysis. 17, left bulb, prolateral view. 18, left bulb, retrolateral view. 19, left tarsus I, clavate trichobothria. Scales = 1 mm (11–13), 0.5 mm (14–19). Palp: bulb piriform. Embolus short, thin, mostly straight but a little curved at end. Several dark parallel keels around bulb surface. Duct gradually tapering, coiled twice on prolateral face. Spinnerets: PMS 0.19 long, 0.11 wide. Basal, middle, and apical segments of PLS 0.46 long, 0.37 wide, 0.33 long, 0.30 wide; 0.14 long, 0.14 wide, respectively. TABLE 2. Cosmopelma decoratum . Male, CEPLAC 3793. Leg measurements, left side. Both legs IV were missing tarsus, metatarsus and tibia.

Tarsus	Metatarsus	Tibia	Patella	Femur	Total
Palp	0.58	–	1.27	0.94	1.67	4.46
Leg I	0.96	1.66	2.34	1.79	2.91	9.66
Leg II	0.94	1.75	2.49	1.51	2.98	9.67
Leg III	1.02	2.11	2.62	1.61	3.03	10.39
Leg IV	?	?	?	1.79	3.31	-

Distribution. Santa Luzia and Uruçuca, in the State of Bahia, Brazil . Discussion. Cosmopelma decoratum was first described only from a very distinctive female ( Figs 1–3 ) which displayed unusual cuspules on the maxillae and the coxae I ( Fig. 2 ). Newly examined material from the Uruçuca municipality, including 12 females and 1 male , proved to be new records of C. decoratum . The redescription was based on a well-preserved female ( Figs 4–10 ) whose spermathecae matched those of the holotype , albeit with minor difference in the thickness of the receptacles ( Fig. 37 ). Such differences could be due to the preservation or positioning of the spermathecae, given how certain variations are seen even between the spermathecae in the same specimen, or also likely due to intraspecific variation, given how other spermathecae from the same group of the Uruçuca spiders also showed some variation in the thickness of the receptacles. Additionally, a male (although not in good condition) is described ( Figs 11–19 ) for the first time. Nevertheless, the diagnostic characters of Cosmopelma in this male are preserved, and important structures such as the bulbs ( Figs 17–18 ) are visible.