Taxonomic revision of the Apiomerus maya species group (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Harpactorinae) Author Masonick, Paul Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USA. Author Weirauch, Christiane 0000-0003-4492-4515 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USA. & https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 4492 - 4515 text Zootaxa 2022 2022-06-17 5154 5 537 556 journal article 77229 10.11646/zootaxa.5154.5.3 09cb9feb-e7d3-4887-b101-197f73fc0452 1175-5326 6655680 689AD1E1-26B4-47B9-B68B-60F63CC846FF Apiomerus pipil Dispons, 1971 Figs 1C , 2C, 2D, 2I , 3C, 3G , 4 Apiomerus pipil Dispons, 1971: 6 . Holotype : ♂ , San Salvador : La Libertad ; ISNB. Apiomerus guatemalensis Dispons, 1971: 10 . Holotype : ♂ , Guatemala ; ISNB. Syn. nov. Apiomerus pipil : Maldonado (1990: 7) (catalog). Apiomerus guatemalensis : Maldonado (1990: 5) (catalog). Revised diagnosis: Recognized by the combination of the following characteristics: (1) large size (> 14 mm in length), (2) quadrate cell weakly delineated by light coloration, (3) basal spot of connexivum 7 that is roughly twice the size of the marking on the preceding segment (from dorsal view), (4) males with V-shaped medial process of pygophore with narrowly spaced, relatively straight rami, (5) elongate basal dorsolateral sclerites of the endosoma that are paddle-shaped (constricted through their midsection) and strongly twisted apically, (6) about 26 endosomal denticles that are arranged into two longitudinal rows of about 13 pairs (proximal denticles arranged into two orderly rows). Redescription: Male: Medium to large, 14.72–17.18 mm in length, width across humeral angles 4.44–5.30 mm (n=6). COLORATION: Mostly black; anterior pronotal lobe dark brown, posterior lobe brown ( Fig. 1C ); corium predominantly black or dark brown, only veins near forewing membrane white or pale-yellow (tan in some older specimens), quadrate cell of the corium is not completely outlined in white or pale-yellow; entire forewing membrane often brown with dark spots, sometimes bicolored with basal portion darkly pigmented and distal portion lighter; basal spot of connexivum 7 roughly twice the size of marking on the preceding segment (from dorsal view); lateral spots of abdominal sterna 3–5 white or pale-yellow (in some specimens they may be tan). STRUCTURE: Medial process of pygophore V-shaped in caudal view ( Fig. 2C–D ); rami narrowly separated and relatively straight along their length; dorsal phallothecal sclerite arrow-shaped in dorsal view, with pair of subtle rounded projections near base; apex of dorsal phallothecal sclerite slightly reflexed and shallowly notched; basal dorsolateral sclerites of endosoma elongated, paddle-shaped, constricted at middle, slightly wider towards apex, and outwardly rotated apically; dorsal surface of endosoma with about 26 denticles arranged into two longitudinal rows comprised of about 13 pairs; dorsolateral surface of endosoma with slight sclerotization near base. Female: Large, 17.42–19.29 mm in length, width across humeral angles 5.34–5.86 mm (n=5). Biology: Specimens have been collected between elevations of 50–1400 m . Adults are typically active from June through September. Distribution: Apiomerus pipil ranges from southern Mexico ( Chiapas ) to Costa Rica . Discussion: Dispons (1971) described A. pipil and A. guatemalensis as two different species; the former was described from a pair collected from El Salvador and the later from a singleton male from Guatemala . We here synonymize the two, giving precedence to A. pipil acting as First Reviser following Art. 24.2 of ICZN (1999) . While Szerlip (1980) did not include A. pipil as a member of the A. maya species group, the types of A. pipil bear many similarities with respect to general habitus and genitalic morphology to those of A. guatemalensis and A. venosus . The male holotype of A. pipil in particular possesses an arrow-shaped dorsal phallothecal sclerite, a pair of elongate basal dorsolateral sclerites of the endosoma, and longitudinal rows of peg-like endosomal denticles. Overall, this species is very similar to some A. venosus specimens. Apiomerus pipil tends to be slightly larger and lacks extensive white markings on the corial veins. The white or pale-yellow markings of the abdomen roughly double in size posteriorly on each successive connexivum. The rami on the pygophore are inserted much closer to one another than those of A. venosus . In his unpublished dissertation, Szerlip (1980) gave names to two other putative new species in the A. maya species group, “ Apiomerus azteca ” and “ Apiomerus maculatus .” He concluded that A. guatemalensis was different from these based on the elongate pointed shape of its basal dorsolateral endosomal sclerites. The types of A. guatemalensis and A. pipil share many similarities with other specimens from the same region that Szerlip had identified as either “ Apiomerus azteca ” and “ Apiomerus maculatus .” We have observed plasticity in these structures however and argue that their shape is not consistent enough to warrant recognition of four distinct species. Type material examined: Apiomerus pipil Dispons, 1971 . Holotype : ♂ , EL SALVADOR : La Libertad : San Salvador , 1-Jul-1954 , J. Bechyné ( UCR _ ENT 00038053 ) ( ISNB ) . Allotype : ♀ , same locality, date and collector as holotype ( UCR _ ENT 00038054 ) ( ISNB ) . Apiomerus guatemalensis Dispons, 1971 . Holotype : ♂ , GUATEMALA : exact locality and date unknown, Gisquière ( UCR _ ENT 00038050 ) ( ISNB ); in poor condition with both antennae and the entire right foreleg missing and forewing membranes severely tattered. The total body length (including the apex of the forewings) that Dispons (1971) recorded ( 11 mm ) is quite shorter than what we measured ( 14.72 mm ). Additional specimens examined: 38 ♂♂ , 55 ♀♀ (see Appendix).