Revision of the South American Ceratognathini (Coleoptera: Lucanidae: Aesalinae) with the description of a new genus and a new species
Author
Paulsen, M. J.
Division of Entomology, University of Nebraska State Museum, W 436 Nebraska Hall, Lincoln, NE, USA,
Author
Mondaca, José
text
Zootaxa
2006
2006-05-01
1191
1191
1
19
journal article
11755334
829B214A-C06F-42CB-B1A8-D729C631DF55
Hilophyllus argentinensis
(
Martínez, 1981
)
,
new combination
(
Figs. 2, 6
,
8
,
13, 15
,
20, 23
,
25
)
Ceratognathus argentinensis
Martínez, 1981: 13
.
Type specimens
Holotype
male lost. Both the
holotype
and
allotype
of
C. argentinensis
were present in the Martínez collection in 1994 as evidenced by a photograph taken at that time by Gerardo Arriagada (Las Cruces,
Chile
). Approximately one week after the photo was taken, Henry Howden purchased the Martínez collection, including nonprimary types. The specimens purchased by Howden were subsequently donated to the CMNC, including the
allotype
of
C. argentinensis
. The
holotype
was deposited in the collection of Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, the depository of the majority of Martínez primary types. The first of three boxes of Martínez types was later stolen from the MACN (F. Ocampo, UNSM, personal communication). The specimens in each box were arranged alphabetically by genus, and as the second box begins with “
Chaetodus
”, the
holotype
of
Ceratognathus argentinensis
was in the box that was stolen and is lost. We designate a
neotype
to maintain stability in the nomenclature. Because the
allotype
is in poor condition with the abdomen missing we are choosing a recently collected male as the
neotype
. The specimen chosen matches the original description of the
holotype
in all characters and is from approximately
45 km
northeast of the type locality in similar habitat.
NEOTYPE
HERE DESIGNATED
: deposited at MNNC, labeled: a) “
CHILE
: Región IX (
Araucania
) / P.N. Villarrica; Puesco,
732 m
/
S 39º31’59.6”
W 71º33’19.6”
/ BL/MV light; M.J. Paulsen / & J. Mondaca;
8 DEC 2004
”; b) on red paper “
Ceratognathus
/
argentinensis
Martínez
/
NEOTYPE
/ det. Paulsen & Mondaca 2006”; c) “
Hilophyllus
/
argentinensis
(Martínez)
/ det. M.J.
Paulsen 2005
”.
Allotype
(CMNC) labeled: a) “
ARGENTINA
/
NEUQUEN
/ Lago Curruhe / Grande, s/tronco / J.P.R., H., A. y A. Martínez / Coll. Martínez / Ene. “967”; b) on pink paper, “
ALLOTYPUS
”; c) on red paper: “
Ceratognathus
/
argentinensis
(female symbol)
/
sp. nov.”
/
(typeset) “A. MARTÍNEZ–DET. 19__” (handwritten year illegible); d) “H. & A. HOWDEN / COLLE CTION / ex. A. Martinez coll”; e) “
Hilophyllus
/
argentinensis
(Martínez)
/ det. M.J.
Paulsen 2005
”.
Redescription
Male (n = 9).
Length:
8.1–8.5 mm
.
Width
:
3.2–3.4 mm
.
Color/Surface:
Reddishbrown, weakly shining. Dorsum (
Fig. 2
) almost uniformly covered with large punctures; most with a single elongate, apically acute scale.
Head:
Eyes large, width of eyes together in dorsal view greater than narrowest interocular width. Mandibles (
Fig. 6
) small, abruptly curved inward at middle; dorsal tooth acute; ventral tooth of right mandible acute or reduced to angulation. Antennal club segments elongate, longer than 1.5 times length of head (
Fig. 15
).
Pronotum:
Sides strongly explanate, explanate margin subequal to eye in width. Anterior angle not produced anteriorly (
Fig. 23
), broadly rounded, appearing nearly contiguous and parallel with anterior margin. Lateral margin broadly rounded, widest at middle.
Elytra:
Shape elongate. Surface almost uniformly punctate, most punctures with scales, punctures without scales forming longitudinal rows (not patches). Scales usually of two colors, brown and light testaceous (scales of greased specimens appearing unicolored). Sutural interval and lateral margin elevated at apex. Surface between punctures smooth (
Fig. 13
), notably shining at 40x.
Legs:
Mesotibiae lacking external tooth.
Abdomen:
Apex of last ventrite truncate.
Male genitalia:
Parameres with exteriorly curved tooth at apex (
Fig. 20
).
Female (n = 5). Differing from male in following characters:
Length:
8.9–9.1 mm
.
Width
:
3.6–3.9 mm
.
Head:
Width of eyes together in dorsal view subequal to 1/3 interocular width. Mandibles small, not strongly curved inward at middle; dorsal tooth of each mandible reduced, ventral tooth of right mandible acute. Antennal club segments short, as long as 1/2 length of head.
Pronotum:
Sides more narrowly explanate. Anterior angles constricted toward head. Lateral margin not uniformly rounded, pinched inward anteriorly.
Diagnosis
This species is distinguished from
H. penai
by the unarmed mesotibiae. Also, it differs from
H. penai
by the elytral scale pattern (
H. argentinensis
with patches of contrasting lighter and darker scales, whereas
H. penai
has patches of lightcolored scales contrasting with glabrous areas). Males of
H. argentinensis
can be distinguished from either of the remaining species because they possess exceptionally long antennal club segments that are much longer than the head and mandibles together. In addition, they have a distinct genitalic form with hooked parameres and a laterally compressed median lobe (
Fig. 20
).
Distribution
(
Fig. 25
)
Argentina
,
Chile
. The species is distributed widely in central
Chile
and extends into neighboring areas with similar habitats in
Argentina
.
Locality data:
14 specimens
examined.
ARGENTINA
(1)
.
Neuquén
(1): Lago Curruhué Grande.
CHILE
(13)
. VIII Región (1): W. of P.N. Nahuelbuta. IX Región (2): P.N. Villarrica
(Puesco, Vol. Villarrica). X Región (10): Cordillera Pelada, M. N. Alerce Costero, P. N.
MochoChoshuenco, R. N. Valdiviana. Temporal distribution. December (2), January (8), February (4).
FIGURES 13–18.
13, detail of elytral surface of
H. argentinensis
showing scale, puncture, and smooth surface structure. Scale bar = 100 m. 14, detail of elytral surface of
H. martinezi
showing scale, puncture, and minutelywrinkled surface structure. Scale bar = 100 m. 15, right antenna of male
H. argentinensis
.
Scale bar = 200 m. 16, right antenna of male
H. martinezi
.
Scale bar = 200 m. 17, scape of right antenna of male
H. martinezi
.
Scale bar = 50 m. 18, external surface of apex of right paramere of male
H. martinezi
showing two minute teeth. Scale bar = 50 m.
Remarks
Martínez (1981)
indicated that the
type
series was collected on a tree trunk, possibly of
Nothofagus
sp.
, in an advanced state of decomposition in the province of
Neuquén
,
Argentina
. More recently, adult and immature specimens of
H. argentinensis
were found in the lower branches of a decomposing coigüe,
Nothofagus dombeyi
(Mirbel) Blume (
Mondaca & Paulsen 2005
)
. However, if this species is termitophilous, it is probable that its distribution is limited more by the presence or absence of termites than the range of a specific host tree. In 2006, MJP collected an additional specimen flying in late afternoon at a height of approximately three meters around the trunk of a partially decomposed lenga,
N. pumilio
(Poeppig & Endlicher) Krasser. Furthermore
,
one specimen
was collected by Dr. Elizabeth Arias (University of California–Berkeley) during insecticidal fogging of
Araucaria araucana
(Molina) K. Koch (Araucariaceae)
west of Parque Nacional Nahuelbuta, suggesting that the species may not be restricted to
Nothofagus
.
In 2004, we collected a single male specimen of
H. argentinensis
at mercury vapor light in Parque Nacional Villarrica. In 2006, we collected
three male
specimens at Reserva Nacional Valdiviana and
one male
specimen at Parque Nacional MochoChoshuenco, all at mercury vapor lights. Previously, there was only anecdotal evidence that this species was attracted to light. It may be relevant that males of this species possess proportionately the largest eyes in the genus; large eyes suggest nocturnal activity, making collection at light traps less surprising although still infrequent.