Aspidochirotida (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) from the northeast coast of Brazil
Author
Prata, Jéssica
Author
Manso, Cynthia L. C.
Author
Christoffersen, Martin L.
text
Zootaxa
2014
2014-11-28
3889
1
127
150
journal article
10.11646/zootaxa.3889.1.8
ae89d0e0-f6d6-43ed-9949-5fdfb276d457
1175-5326
229183
F31AA0BE-440A-40FB-8EDC-249807156334
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
pseudofossor
Deichmann, 1930
Figure 5
,
Table 3
Stichopus rigidus
Selenka, 1867
: 317
.
Holothuria rigida
Semper, 1868
: 79
;
Thèel, 1886
: 231
.
Holothuria pleuripus
Sluiter, 1910
: 333
.
Holothuria hypamma
Clark, H. L., 1921
: 178
.
Holothuria fossor
Deichmann, 1926
: 18
–19.
Holothuria pseudofossor
.―
Deichmann, 1930
: 57
–58; 1954: 394;
Tommasi, 1974
: 2
;
Laguarda-Figueras
et al
., 2001
: 17
–18;
González
et al
., 2002
: 124
–125.
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
pseudofossor
.―
Rowe, 1969
: 154
–157.
Material examined.
6°57’S
;
34°38’W
, PB,
Brazil
, 1 spec. (
UFPB
.ECH-2070).
Type
locality.
Montego Bay,
Jamaica
(
Deichmann 1930
).
Diagnosis.
See
Deichmann (1930: 57–58)
.
TABLE 3.
Measurements of calcareous ossicles of
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
pseudofossor
Deichmann
, from the northeast coast of Brazil. Size range of samples: 40 mm. SD, standard deviation; N, number of samples.
Buttons |
Length (µm) |
Width (µm) |
Dorsal |
Ventral |
Dorsal |
Ventral |
Mean |
101.35 |
108.9 |
38.18 |
38.5 |
SD |
20.47 |
19.34 |
4.61 |
6.50 |
N |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Tables |
Diameter (µm) |
Height (µm) |
Dorsal |
Ventral |
Dorsal |
Ventral |
Mean |
61.75 |
62.22 |
42.9 |
45.78 |
SD |
4.21 |
5.41 |
7.37 |
6.89 |
N |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Perforated rods |
Length (µm) |
Width (µm) |
Dorsal |
Ventral |
Dorsal |
Ventral |
Mean |
178.2 |
199.98 |
43.84 |
44.16 |
SD |
22.00 |
19.53 |
5.77 |
7.38 |
N |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Rods of tentacles |
Length (µm) |
Width (µm) |
Mean |
166.88 |
9.9 |
SD |
56.60 |
0 |
N |
30 |
30 |
Description.
1 specimen
analyzed, measuring
40 mm
long and
10 mm
wide. Body elongate, slightly curved. Tube feet covering the ventral side, with two rows in each radius. Dorsal side with two rows of small papillae in each radius. Tube feet more numerous ventrally (
Fig. 5
A). Body wall not very thick, with mouth and anus ventral. Tentacles retracted. Color in alcohol light pink, with white papillae. Calcareous ring simple, radial plate rectangular-shaped. Interradial low, triangular in shape (
Fig. 5
B). Single small polian vesicle balloon-shaped, a short stone canal with rounded madreporite. Longitudinal muscles not divided, with free margins. Respiratory trees slightly branched, about ¼ length of the body, color greenish. Body wall and tube feet with tables, about 60–70 µm long and 30–50 µm high, spires of 4 pillars, with about 8 terminal teeth (
Fig. 5
C–D). Disc with a large central hole and about 10 small marginal holes, margins undulated and often almost closed as a basket. Buttons smooth, about 80–150 µm long and 30–50 µm wide, with central axis slightly elevated and 2 parallel rows of 3 or more holes (
Fig. 5
E). Large perforated rods 150–240 µm long and 30–55 µm wide, with holes of irregular size (
Fig. 5
F). Simple rods in tentacles, 80–250 µm long and 10 µm wide. Elongate rods with 3–5 pairs of small holes. Ossicles of ventral region usually more developed, with higher tables, longer buttons, and perforated plates (
Tab. 3
).
FIGURE 5.
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
pseudofossor
Deichmann. A
, external view; B, calcareous ring; C–D, tables from body wall; E, buttons from body wall; F, perforated rods from body wall.
Geographical distribution.
United States
(Florida), Antilles (
Puerto Rico
,
Curaçao
),
Venezuela
(
Hendler
et al
. 1995
), and
Brazil
(Paraíba, Rio de Janeiro). Depth down to
187 m
(
Tommasi 1974
).
Comments.
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
pseudofossor
is usually mistaken for
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
cubana
Ludwig, 1875
, although the first species is more cylindrical, with larger tube feet on the ventral side, numerous papillae developed as tube feet on the dorsal side, and differs in the ossicles (
Hendler
et al
. 1995
).
Holothuria
(
Cystipus
)
cubana
has tables with fewer perforations on the disc margin, and does not have large supporting plates. According to
Deichmann (1930)
, Ludwig did not distinguish the two species in 1875 because he described the smooth supporting plates of the tube feet as buttons belonging to the body wall.
Tommasi (1974)
recorded the species for the
25°44'S
–
45°09'9"W
, near the coast of Rio de Janeiro, noting that the central rod was less prominent than in the original description, although the plates and other characters agreed with those of
H.
(
C.
)
pseudofossor
. The specimen described here seems to be a juvenile of
H.
(
C
.)
pseudofossor
, and agrees with the previous descriptions.