Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Geodiapria longiceps Kieffer, 1911 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) and synonymy of the genus Geodiapria Kieffer, 1910 Author Huebner, Jeremy https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5624-8573 Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Muenchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany huebner@snsb.de Author Chemyreva, Vasilisa G. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-6259 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia Author Notton, David G. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-7915 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Collection Centre, 242 West Granton Road, Granton, Edinburgh EH 5 1 JA, UK text ZooKeys 2023 2023-10-23 1183 1 11 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1183.110952 journal article http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1183.110952 1313-2970-1183-1 1C5D67D6A4DD4D00976757D55C2DB9E7 9D5F0148B3EA5F8390E479374BC3B7F6 Basalys rufocinctus (Kieffer, 1911) Loxotropa longiceps Wasmann, 1909: 68, 172, syn. nov., preoccupied nec B. longiceps (Ashmead, 1893). Geodiapria longiceps Kieffer, 1911a: 897, syn. nov., preoccupied nec B. longiceps (Ashmead, 1893). Loxotropa rufocinsta Loxotropa rufocinsta Kieffer, 1911b: 916, 939 takes precedence over L. rufosignata by first revisor action. Loxotropa rufosignata Kieffer, 1911b: 914, syn. nov. BIN number. BOLD_BIN: AEW6196 ( Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007 ). Type material. Holotype ♀ of Loxotropa longiceps labelled: "Allotype ♂ (!)/ Solenopsia imitatrix / Wasmann, err. det.!; Holotype ♀/ Geodiapria longiceps / Kieffer, 1911; Loxotropa / Loxotropa longiceps n. sp./ ♀ Kieff.; 5.98. Exaet./ b. Solenopsis ; Solenopsis m/ Kol. 293. sang [=colony #293 of Formica sanguinea ]." (NHME) (Fig. 2 ). Holotype ♀ of Geodiapria longiceps - the same specimen as the holotype of Loxotropa longiceps q.v. Holotype ♀ of Loxotropa rufosignata labelled: "Is. Giglio/ IV.1902/ G. Doria; Loxotropa / Loxotropa rufosignata ; ♀" (MCSN) (Fig. 3 ). Syntypes 2♀ 3♂ of Loxotropa rufocinsta : 2♀ labelled: "Holotype [sic - there is no original designation]; Bitche; Loxotropa / Loxotropa rufocincta ; Museum Paris/ 1957/ coll. Kieffer. 2♂ labelled: Loxotropa / Loxotropa rufocincta ; Bitche; ♂; Allotype; Museum Paris/ 1957/ coll. Kieffer. ♂ labelled: Paratype; Museum Paris/ 1957/ coll. Kieffer; Bitche" (MNHN). Other material. Denmark • ♀ ; N. E. Zealand , Tisvilde Hegn ; 56°02'N , 12°04'E ; 4 May 1994 ; P.N. Buhl leg. (DNPC) . France • ♂ ; Corsica , Corse du Sud , Bastelicaccia nr. Ajaccio ; 41°55'N , 08°30'E ; 14-21 Jun. 1996 ; C. Villemant leg.; Malaise trap , Quercus suber stand (DNPC) • ♀ ; Gard , Mont Ventoux , Malaucene ; 44°13'N , 05°08'E ; 1-8 Jul. 1997 ; C. Villemant leg.; maquis, Quercus ilex (DNPC) • ♂ ; same locality; 5-12 Aug. 1997 ; C. Villemant leg.; maquis, Quercus ilex (DNPC) . Germany • ♀ ; Bavaria , Dammbach , Dammbachtal ; 49°51′58″N , 09°19′30″E ; 338 m a.s.l. ; 16 Jul. 2021 ; J. Huebner leg.; nutrient poor grassland; ZSM-HYM-42434-GO2 (BOLDSYSTEMS Process ID: DTIII5299-22; GenBank accession ID: OR450821 ) (SNSB-ZSM) • ♀ same locality; 16 Jul. 2021 ; J. Huebner leg.; nutrient poor grassland; ZSM-HYM-42433-H11 (BOLDSYSTEMS Process ID: DTIII5225-22; GenBank accession ID: OR450822 ) (DNPC) . Norway • ♀ ; Onsoy , Hanko Bloksberg , EIS 20, O ; 3-29 Jun. 1995 ; O. Hanssen & J.I.I. Batvik leg.; pitfall trap (DNPC) . Spain • ♀ ; Granada , Calahonda ; Jul. 1987 ; L. Lockey leg.; Malaise trap , (DNPC) • ♀ ; Granada , Sierra Nevada ; 1600 m a.s.l. ; 10 Apr. 1959 ; C. Besuchet leg. (NHMUK) . United Kingdom • ♀ ; Cheshire , Abbotts Moss ; 53°12′27″N , 02°36′23″W ; 12 Oct. 1990 ; D.G. Notton leg.; swept, stream (DNPC) • 3♀ ; Norfolk , Santon Downham ; 52°27′45″N , 00°40′29″E ; 15 Aug. 1984 ; J. Field leg.; Malaise trap , heath with Betula and Pinus (DNPC) • 1♂ ; same locality; 18-25 Aug. 1983 ; J. Field leg. (DNPC) . Diagnosis. Female Head elongate, rounded, about 1.2 times as long as wide; frons without angles or teeth; antenna 12-segmented with abrupt 3-segmented clava; A11 transverse in lateral view, as long as wide in dorsal view; A6-A9 transverse in lateral view (Fig. 1A ); mesonotum and scutellum slightly convex in longer winged individuals, almost flat in shorter winged individuals (Fig. 1B ), anterior pronotum with a ruff of whitish setae; anterior scutellar pit small and transverse, less than one third the width of the scutellum; propodeum with medial keel slightly raised anteriorly, less so in short winged individuals; fore wing variable in length, at most extending well beyond apex of gaster, at least reaching anterior margin of petiole; basal vein present in longer winged individuals although hard to see as it is fine and barely pigmented, absent in shorter winged individuals; femora of all legs broadened medially, fore femora 2.2-2.3 times as long as wide in lateral view, with sharp keel ventrally; petiole densely covered dorsally and laterally with long orange flattened setae (Fig. 1D ); basal margin of large tergite with two whitish hair tufts more or less concealed under petiolar setae; disc of large tergite normally bare, although the shortest winged individuals, e.g. the type of L. rufosignata , may have some long setae. Male As for female except antenna 14-segmented with A4 expanded posteriorly subtriangular with a fine flange; A5 elongate, flagellar segments becoming shorter towards apex, A13 more or less quadrate; fore wing variable in length at least reaching apex of gaster, at most extending well beyond it; basal vein present, fine, barely pigmented; femora slightly less broadened than female. Body length 1.3-2.2 mm (♀); 1.5-2.4 mm (♂). Figure 1. Basalys rufocinctus (Kieffer, 1911) ♀: A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C wing with reduced venation (arrow) D close-up of petiole. Figure 2. Holotype ♀ of Loxotropa longiceps (Wasmann, 1909), the same specimen is also the holotype ♀ of Geodiapria longiceps Kieffer, 1911: A habitus, lateral view B labels. Figure 3. Holotype ♀ of Loxotropa rufosignata Kieffer, 1911: A habitus, dorsal view B labels. Distribution. Czechia ( Macek 1989 as B. rufocincta [sic]); Denmark ( Buhl 1998 as B. rufocincta [sic]) confirmed here; France - mainland France ( Kieffer 1911b as L. rufocincta ) confirmed here; France - Corsica (new record); Germany (new record); Italy ( Kieffer 1911b as L. rufosignata ); Netherlands ( Wasmann 1909 as L. longiceps ); Norway (new record); Spain (new record); Sweden ( Hedqvist 2007 as B. ruficincta [sic]); United Kingdom ( Nixon 1980 as B. rufocincta [sic]) confirmed here. Biology. Host unknown. Basalys rufocinctus has previously been considered to be a myrmecophile but the evidence is weak. Of all the specimens we have seen only one, Wasmann's , was found in an ant nest, in a mixed colony of Solenopsis fugax and Formica sanguinea , and may have entered the nest by accident. Wasmann provided no ethological observations to demonstrate myrmecophily and the species has no obvious morphological adaptation for myrmecophily when compared to other Basalys . Remarks. From the extensive material examined we recognised only one taxon, diagnosed above, and with more variation than previously understood. Most importantly we found that the head was always elongate when seen from above, also significant variation in fore wing length, and expression of the basal vein which was present and weakly pigmented in longer winged individuals, becoming hyaline and then altogether absent in shorter winged individuals. This taxon is therefore a Basalys since there is no significant morphological difference: some other species of Basalys are known to have elongate heads, also some other Basalys have the basal vein absent in short-winged individuals. Based on our examination of the type specimens we consider all four nominal species above, including Geodiapria longiceps , belong to this taxon. Further support for the generic placement of B. rufocinctus is based on genetic analyses. A representative ML tree (Appendix 1; Idiotypa maritima (Haliday, 1833) as outgroup, 1000 generations) with 76 Diapriini specimens shows B. rufocinctus nested within a Basalys clade (Appendix 1). The obtained sequences are publicly available on the BOLDSYSTEMS platform ( Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007 ). Some nomenclatural notes are necessary: We differ from some authors in recognising Loxotropa longiceps as a nominal species separate from, and not just a combination of, Geodiapria longiceps . Loxotropa longiceps is available from Wasmann's (1909) paper where the name is first used. The name is made available by indication (ICZN 1999: Code art. 12.2.1) since Wasmann refers to his description (Wasmann, 1899) of a specimen previously misidentified as a male of Solenopsia imitatrix Wasmann, 1899. Although Wasmann attributes the name to Kieffer, the author of the name is actually Wasmann because he was responsible for publishing the name and writing the prior description (ICZN 1999: Code art. 50.1). The oldest available name for the taxon is thus L. longiceps Wasmann, 1909. As L. longiceps is transferred to Basalys it becomes a secondary junior homonym of B. longiceps (Ashmead, 1893) so is invalid. The next oldest available name is G. longiceps described as new by Kieffer (1911a) . The date of publication is early 1911: evidence comes from the NHMUK copy which has a library stamp 25 Feb. 1911, and the page bound into the end of vol. 10 of Species des Hymenopteres d'Europe et d'Algerie which says 1 Mar. 1911. As G. longiceps is transferred to Basalys it becomes a secondary junior homonym of B. longiceps (Ashmead, 1893) so is invalid. The next oldest available names are L. rufosignata Kieffer, 1911b and L. rufocincta Kieffer, 1911b which were published simultaneously in mid-1911: the page bound into the end of vol. 10 of Species des Hymenopteres d'Europe et d'Algerie says 1 Jun. 1911. Since the only two remaining potentially valid names are published simultaneously, we here make a first revisor action to determine precedence thus: L. rufocincta has precedence over L. rufosignata . We have chosen L. rufocincta because this is the more widely used name. L. longiceps , G. longiceps and L. rufosignata are all new synonyms of L. rufocincta . The valid name is thus Basalys rufocinctus , a combination first recognised by Nixon (1980) . Despite previous misspellings, when in combination with Basalys , the correct spelling of the species epithet is rufocinctus ; the gender of Basalys is masculine ( Notton (2014) .