Review of the Indian Ocean spikefish genus Mephisto (Tetraodontiformes Triacanthodidae)
Author
Bemis, Katherine E.
NOAA National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560, U. S. A. & Department of Fisheries Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary
Author
Tyler, James C.
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560, U. S. A. tylerj @ si. edu; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 3202 - 080 X
Author
Psomadakis, Peter N.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
Author
Ferris, Lauren Newell
Department of Physical Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary
Author
Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju
Department of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala,
text
Zootaxa
2020
2020-06-22
4802
1
82
98
journal article
21261
10.11646/zootaxa.4802.1.5
b2757491-7166-49e5-a272-276aa62cc529
1175-5326
3991949
1352708F-9422-4E11-99DB-99ADE060AA56
Mephisto
Tyler 1966
Mephisto
Tyler 1966a: 1–5
(original description;
type
species
Mephisto fraserbrunneri
Tyler 1966
; etymology: genus named for the devil
Mephisto
, second only to Satan in the Faustian legend of Mephistopheles, in allusion to the reddish exterior, blackish interior (peritoneum), and the retrose-barbed dorsal-fin spines being the equivalent of horns in the
type
species).
Species.
The genus
Mephisto
contains two species:
Mephisto fraserbrunneri
Tyler 1966
and
Mephisto albomaculosus
Matsuura, Psomadakis, and Mya Than Tun 2018
.
Subfamilial placement.
The two subfamilies of
Triacanthodidae
are diagnosed primarily by features in two different regions of the skeleton: the posterior process of the pelvis and the posterodorsal region of the skull. The width, shape, and structure of the posterior process of the pelvis (
Fig. 3A, B
) is visible externally; the shape of the supraoccipital and its relationship to the epioccipitals is only visible internally (
Fig. 3C, D
; see
Tyler, 1968: 62
;
1980: 56
).
FIGURE 2.
Distribution and habitat of
Mephisto
.
A.
All known records of
Mephisto
,
including holotypes of
M. fraserbrunneri
and
M. albomaculosus
,
non-type specimens of
M. fraserbrunneri
,
and photographic records of specimens that were not retained.
B.
Detail of region in white box in part A highlighting collection localities on continental shelf off Somalia and Socotra, and Error Seamount (part of the Carlsberg Ridge). Bathymetric data from
Smith and Sandwell (1997)
.
FIGURE 3.
Micro-CT scan of
Mephisto fraserbrunneri
,
ZMH 5629, 66.0 mm SL, showing subfamilial characters.
A.
Lateral view, highlighting extent of pelvis.
B.
Ventral view showing flat, scale-covered pelvis that tapers to a point posteriorly, much wider anteriorly between the pelvic spines than posteriorly.
C.
Dorsal view of the rear of the skull showing the flattened supraoccipital (yellow) and its low crest, with the supraoccipital not separating the epioccipitals (gray) on the dorsal surface of the skull.
D.
Oblique view of the rear of the skull highlighting the median, narrow, supraoccipital crest located in the middle of the supraoccipital.
The Hollardiinae (
Hollardia
,
Parahollardia
,
western Atlantic, except one species in Pacific Oceania) have a shaft-like posterior process of the pelvis that is relatively rounded in ventral view and is not much wider between the bases of the pelvic spines than at the blunt posterior end, and they have a dome-like supraoccipital that separates the contralateral epioccipitals posteriorly on the dorsal surface of the skull. The
Triacanthodinae
(all other extant genera, Indo-Pacific except one species in western Atlantic) have a basin-like posterior process of the pelvis that is flat ventrally, with slightly dorsally upturned lateral edges, and is wider anteriorly between the pelvic spines than posteriorly where it tapers to an end (see
Tyler, 1968
for illustrations of the posterior process of the pelvis in all genera of triacanthodids), and they have a flattened supraoccipital with a median crest that does not separate the epioccipitals posteriorly on the dorsal surface of the skull. The only fossil triacanthodids are two taxa from the Oligocene of the Polish Carpathian Mountains, the hollardiin
Prohollardia
and the triacanthodin
Carpathospinus
. The two triacanthodid subfamilies diverged no less than 29 to 24 MYA (see
Tyler
et al.
, 1993
).
TABLE 2.
Meristic data from eight examined specimens of
Mephisto fraserbrunneri
. Dashes indicate data that could not be obtained because of specimen damage or specimen having been cleared and stained prior to this study.
DABFUK/ FI/304
|
ANSP 103314
|
DABFUK/ FI/303
|
DABFUK/ FI/301
|
ZMH 5629
|
USNM 306629
|
DABFUK/ FI/302
|
USNM 350153
|
Character
|
Holotype
|
Standard Length (mm) |
48.6 |
52.2 |
64.2 |
64.5 |
66.0 |
68.8 |
102.7 |
105.8 |
Dorsal-fin rays |
VI + 16 |
VI + 16 |
VI + — |
VI + 16 |
VI + 16 |
VI + 16 |
VI + 15 |
VI + 16 |
Anal-fin rays |
14 |
14 |
— |
14 |
14 |
14 |
13 |
14 |
Pectoral-fin rays (Left, Right) |
14, 15 |
14, 14 |
— |
14, 14 |
14, 14 |
14, 14 |
13, 13 |
13, 13 |
Pelvic-fin rays (Left, Right) |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
1, 1 |
Olfactory lamellae |
— |
10 |
— |
10 |
9 |
10 |
— |
— |
Gill rakers |
— |
19 |
— |
17 |
19 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
Lamellae in pseudobranch |
— |
18 |
— |
17 |
19 |
17 |
20 |
19 |
Outer teeth in upper jaw |
24 |
17 |
21 |
23 |
18 |
20 |
24 |
20 |
Inner teeth in upper jaw |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Outer teeth in lower jaw |
27 |
19 |
27 |
27 |
22 |
25 |
27 |
23 |
Inner teeth in lower jaw |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* 1 tooth offset from main series of teeth.
Mephisto fraserbrunneri
has the diagnostic characters of the
Triacanthodinae
(
Fig. 3
).
Mephisto albomaculosus
has the pelvic characters of triacanthodins, but the shape of its supraoccipital and its articulation with the epioccipitals is not known; presumably it is typical of triacanthodins.
Diagnosis.
The genus
Mephisto
is distinguished from all other triacanthodids by a long gill opening (13.5– 17.6% SL;
Table 3
), with its lower edge reaching slightly below the lower edge of the lobe of the pectoral-fin base (
Fig. 4A
; see
Tyler, 1968
: figs. 137, 150, 164, 173 for comparisons of length of gill opening across ontogeny for all genera).
Description.
(1) Pelvis thin and basin-like, its ventral surface flat but with slightly upturned edges; width between the pelvic-fin spines moderate to somewhat narrowed (diagnostically different between the two species, with
M. fraserbrunneri
10.6–12.1% SL and
M. albomaculosus
7.8% SL); pelvic width into the pelvic length 2.6–4.0 times (likewise diagnostically different between the two species, with
M. fraserbrunneri
2.6–3.2 times and
M. albomaculosus
4.0 times). (2) Deep bodied (45.8–54.2% SL). (3) Short snouted (12.4–14.5% SL). (4) Long postorbital length (11.6–13.2% SL). (5) Six dorsal-fin spines decreasing gradually in length from the first to the short last spine, all visible externally (
Table 2
). (6) Origin of the anal fin distinctly posterior to the origin of the soft dorsal fin. (7) Mouth terminal, with a moderate number of conical teeth (
17–25 in
upper jaw and
19–27 in
lower jaw;
Table 2
;
Matsuura
et al.
, 2018
) in a single series with no teeth internal to them (one specimen of
M. fraserbrunneri
has one lower jaw tooth slightly offset posteriorly from the main row, but we do not interpret this as an internal tooth
sensu
Tyler, 1968:58
). (8) Few olfactory lamellae (9–11;
Table 2
;
Matsuura
et al.
, 2018
). (9) Moderate number of gill rakers (15–19;
Table 2
;
Matsuura
et al.
, 2018
). (10) Pseudobranch with a moderate number of lamellae (16–20;
Table 2
;
Matsuura
et al.
, 2018
), the lower edge of the base of the pseudobranch level with the upper edge of the lobe of the pectoral-fin base (
Table 4
;
Matsuura
et al.
, 2018
). (11) Few spinules per scale, consisting of one large central spinule and smaller spinules dorsal and ventral to it that increase in number and branching during ontogeny; only a single spinule present in scales of smallest known specimens (DABFUK/FI/304,
48.6 mm
SL and ANSP 103314,
52.2 mm
SL;
Table 4
); some spinules are branched in large specimens (e.g.,
Fig. 5
; USNM
350153, 105.8 mm
SL, DABFUK/FI/
302, 102.7 mm
SL, and NSMT-P 132271,
94.4 mm
SL;
Table 4
;
Matsuura
et al.
, 2018
). (12) Retrose barbs on dorsal- and pelvic-fin spines (
Fig. 3
). (13) Pelvic fin with only one soft ray. (14) Small patch of isolated spinulose scales on middle of upper surface of dorsal lip (
Fig. 6
).
Geographic and depth distribution and physical environment.
Specimens and photographs of
Mephisto
are known from the Indian Ocean from off
Somalia
to
Myanmar
(
Fig. 2
), from
74 m
to
446 m
(
Table 1
). Preliminary analysis, based on World Ocean Atlas 2018, suggests that
Mephisto
occurs in waters of 10.2–25.3°C and salinity of 34.00–35.43 psu (
Table 5
); however, more specimens are needed to confirm this because both salinity and temperature ranges were expanded by photographic records of unretained specimens of
M. albomaculosus
and
M. fraserbrunneri
.
TABLE 3.
Morphometric data from eight examined specimens of
Mephisto fraserbrunneri
. Dashes indicate data that could not be obtained because of specimen damage or specimen having been cleared and stained prior to this study. Asterisk indicates data taken from Sheherbachev
et al.
(1986).
Character
|
DABFUK/ FI/304
|
ANSP 103314 Holotype
|
DABFUK/ FI/303
|
DABFUK/ FI/301
|
ZMH 5629
|
USNM 306629
|
DABFUK/ FI/302
|
USNM 350153
|
Standard Length (SL) (mm) |
48.6 |
52.2 |
64.2 |
64.5 |
66.0 |
68.8 |
102.7 |
105.8 |
Head length as % SL |
42.8% |
42.7% |
40.8% |
40.8% |
40.5% |
39.5% |
38.3% |
40.6% |
Snout length as % SL |
13.4% |
12.4% |
14.5% |
13.8% |
13.2% |
12.5% |
13.1% |
14.2% |
Eye diameter as % SL |
16.5% |
17.0% |
16.8% |
15.0% |
15.2% |
14.8% |
14.6% |
15.9% |
Postorbital length as % SL |
12.6% |
13.0% |
11.8% |
13.2% |
13.2% |
12.6% |
11.6% |
12.6% |
Interorbital width as % SL |
8.2% |
7.8% |
7.2% |
6.4% |
7.1% |
8.3% |
7.2% |
7.4% |
Mouth width as % SL |
8.8% |
10.1% |
8.0% |
8.4% |
8.0% |
8.1% |
8.1% |
8.2% |
Gill opening length as % SL |
17.6% |
14.1% |
17.1% |
16.3% |
13.8% |
14.5% |
17.1% |
13.5%* |
Snout to spinous dorsal-fin origin distance as % SL |
49.4% |
46.1% |
50.4% |
47.2% |
46.8% |
48.1% |
47.2% |
46.8% |
Body depth as % SL |
54.1% |
52.2% |
51.7% |
54.2% |
53.2% |
53.3% |
50.5% |
45.8% |
First dorsal spine length as % SL |
33.6% |
30.8% |
35.2% |
34.4% |
32.3% |
34.5% |
33.9% |
— |
Second dorsal spine length as % SL |
28.8% |
26.2% |
31.6% |
30.4% |
27.6% |
27.8% |
30.3% |
— |
...Continued on the next page