On Venezuelan pholcid spiders (Araneae, Pholcidae) Author Huber, Bernhard A. 33607F65-19BF-4DC9-94FD-4BB88CED455F Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany. b.huber@leibniz-zfmk.de Author Villarreal, Osvaldo 679C385E-B068-4351-9D2F-97753E534C26 Museo del Instituto de Zoología Agrícola, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay, Venezuela. & Museu Nacional / UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. osvaldovillarreal@gmail.com text European Journal of Taxonomy 2020 2020-10-01 718 1 317 journal article 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 4069574 F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 Priscula chejapi González-Sponga, 1999 Figs 967–971 , 1062 Priscula chejapi González-Sponga, 1999: 132 , figs 10–19 (♂ ♀ ). Misidentification Priscula chejapi – Huber 2000: 139 , figs 533–535 (♂). Notes We reexamined the type material: ♂ holotype , 1 ♀ paratype , MIZA 105653 (MAGS 1362), “Central Hidroelectrica General José Antonio Paez” [approximately 8.883° N , 70.635° W ], 10 Jul. 1992 (A.R. Delgado de G., M. García, M.A. González S.). The palp of the holotype is shown in Figs 967–968 ; the procursus differs clearly from the figures in Huber (2000 : figs 533–534), which are thus based on a misidentified specimen (of a formally undescribed species). The palp of the holotype appears identical to that of P. venezuelana Simon, 1893 . The two species are not synonymized here because the epigynum of the paratype of P. chejapi ( Figs 970–971 ) appears slightly rounder (less triangular) in ventral view and is not flanked by a pair of dark anterior sclerites like that of P. venezuelana . Distribution Known from type locality only, in Venezuela , Mérida (Fig. 1062).