Commented catalogue of Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, with remarks on the collection of Jaro Mráz in the National Museum in Prague Author Sekerka, Lukáš text Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 2020 Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae 2020-12-26 60 2 667 707 http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2020.048 journal article 10.37520/aemnp.2020.048 1804-6487 5178055 FD33083B-91A0-4C89-B45D-A31561955027 * Cephaloleia impressa Uhmann, 1930 ( Fig. 11 ) Published record. São Paulo (UΗආൺඇඇ 1930). Type material examined. Hඈඅඈඍඒඉൾ ( Fig. 11 ): glued, missing right antenna from antennomere VI on, ‘ SAÕ PAULO | BRAS.MRÁZ LGT. | MUS.PRAGENSE [w, p, cb, bf] || HOLOTYPE [r, t, s] || Cephaloleia | impressa n. sp. | det. Uhmann 28. [w, hw by Uhmann, s] || Collect. | Spaeth [w, p, cb]’ ( NHMW ). Additional material examined. BRAZIL : Sඞඈ Pൺඎඅඈ: without further data, 9 spec. , J. Mráz leg. ( NMPC , 3 LSPC ). Distribution. Brazil ( Santa Catarina , São Paulo ). Remarks. Spaeth also identified part of the hispines and retained duplicates for his collection. Among them were also specimens which he was not able to identify to species, so he sent them later to Uhmann but probably without mentioning that more specimens exist in NMPC collection. As a result, C. impressa was described based on the holotype assigned to Spaeth’s collection, even though there were more specimens in NMPC. Sඍൺංඇൾඌ +| Gൺඋർටൺ-Rඈൻඅൾൽඈ (2014) published two specimens from Nova Teutonia (Santa Cataria) as C. caerulescens ; however, based on the photograph provided by Ed Riley they were misidentified and belong to C. impressa .