Review of Harpactea ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae: Dysderidae) of Portugal Author Řezáč, Milan Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, CZ- 16106 Prague 6, Czechia Author Cardoso, Pedro 0000-0001-8119-9960 Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 17, FI- 00014 Helsinki, Finland. pedro. cardoso @ helsinki. fi; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 8119 - 9960 pedro.cardoso@helsinki.fi Author Řezáčová, Veronika 0000-0002-1749-0355 Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, CZ- 16106 Prague 6, Czechia & strver @ seznam. cz; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 1749 - 0355 strver@seznam.cz text Zootaxa 2023 2023-04-06 5263 3 335 364 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.3.2 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.5263.3.2 1175-5326 7804268 20CB3CA0-BEF9-474C-8931-6A7948B9CA61 Harpactea minoccii Ferrández, 1982 ( Fig. 1E , 2E , 3E , 4E , 7A , 9 ) H. minoccii Ferrández 1982: 23 , fig. 1a–e (description based on ♁); Ferrández 1990: 32, fig. 1g (♁); Le Peru 2011: 275 , fig. 426 (♁, redrawn from Ferrández 1982 ). Material. Type material was not examined. New material. Mertola , Corredoura , 37.746 , -7.642 , Quercus coccifera bush, 1 ♀ , 15 April 2005 , 1 juv. , 8 November 2005 , 1 ♀ , 3 April 2008 , 3 ♀♀ , 29 March 2013 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Mertola , Mertola , 37.643 , -7.661 , Eucalyptus trees, 5 ♀♀ , 30 March 2013 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Mertola , Mertola (montado), 37.652, -7.66, Quercus suber , 31 ♁♁, 25 ♀♀ , 15 May 2000 , leg. P. Cardoso , Finnish Museum of Natural History , Helsinki (http://id.luomus.fi/KN.23950) ; Mertola , Alcaria Ruiva , 37.7, -7.762, woody vegetation, 4 ♀♀ , 6 juv. , 2 April 2008 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Mertola , Corte da Velha , 37.687 , -7.729 , woody vegetation, 1 ♀ , 2 April 2008 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Mertola , Mesquita , 37.543 , -7.518 , woody vegetation, 1 ♀ , 4 April 2008 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Sines , 37.955 , -8.867 , woody vegetation, 1 ♁, 10 November 2005 , leg. S. Henriques , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Loule , Santa Catarina , 37.746 , -7.642 , woody vegetation, 1 ♀ , 6 April 2008 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Nisa, Nisa , 39.518 , -7.651 , Eucalyptus grove, 1 ♀ , 27 May 2005 , leg. C. Rufino , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Moura , Serra da Adiça , 37.978 , -7.294 , Quercus ilex wood, 2 ♀♀ , 20 April 2005 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Evora , Herdade da Mitra , 38.532 , -8.018 , woody vegetation, 1 ♀ , 5-7 November 2004 , leg. S. Pekár , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; 5 ♁♁, 17- 19 April 2005 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; 2 ♁♁, 26 March 2009 , leg. S. Pekár , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague ; Campinho , 38.3752 , -7.4236 , Quercus ilex wood, 1 ♁, 22 March 2022 , leg. M. Řezáč , coll. Crop Research Institute , Prague . Diagnosis. Males can be distinguished from the similar H. subiasi by very concave prolateral side of pedipalp tarsus, and by proportions of conductor and embolus. The embolus is thicker and relatively shorter, and the conductor is of similar width in its whole length, while in H. subiasi it is markedly tapering ( Fig. 4E ). FIGURE 6. Portuguese Harpactea spiders. Vulva. A. H. fageli . Portugal: Setúbal; B. H. henriquesi sp. nov. Portugal: Torres Novas; C. H. pekari sp. nov. Portugal: Corredoura.Views: dor.—dorsal, fro.—anterior, hin.—posterior, ven.—ventral.Structures: aa—anterior arc, cb—copulatory bursa, kp—keel-like projection, mr—median rod, pd—posterior diverticle, s—spermatheca, tb—posterior transversal bar, th—transversal hinge, wt—whitish tissue. The photos in grey scale are made under the scanning electron microscope. FIGURE 7. Portuguese Harpactea spiders. Vulva. A. H. minoccii . Portugal: Mertola; B. H. subiasi . Portugal: Setúbal. Views: dor.—dorsal, fro.—anterior, hin.—posterior, ven.—ventral. Structures: aa—anterior arc, cb—copulatory bursa, kp—keel-like projection, mr—median rod, pd—posterior diverticle, s—spermatheca, tb—posterior transversal bar, th—transversal hinge, wt—whitish tissue. The photo in grey scale is made under the scanning electron microscope. FIGURE 8. Portuguese Harpactea spiders. Vulva. A. H. magnibulbi . Portugal: Fóia; B. H. korenkoi sp. nov. Portugal: Carrapateira; C. H. crespoi sp. nov. Portugal: Sobral da Adiça; D. H. algarvensis . Portugal: Barranco do Velho; E. H. tavirensis . Portugal: Barranco do Velho. Views: dor.—dorsal, fro.—anterior, hin.—posterior, ven.—ventral. Structures: aa—anterior arc, cb—copulatory bursa, kp—keel-like projection, mr—median rod, pd—posterior diverticle, s—spermatheca, tb—posterior transversal bar, th—transversal hinge, wt—whitish tissue. TABLE 1. Measurements and spination of holotypes of the new Portuguese Harpactea species and Harpactea tavirensis . The numbers in brackets indicate the number of spines on left legs. Measurements are in mm.

Harpactea korenkoi sp. nov.	Harpactea henriquesi sp. nov.	Harpactea pekari sp. nov.	Harpactea crespoi sp. nov.	Harpactea tavirensis	Harpactea adicensis sp. nov.	Harpactea krejcii sp. nov.	Harpactea dolanskyi sp. nov.
Carapace
Length	2.1	1.38	1.62	1.6	1.73	1.69	1.78	2.22
Maximum width	1.59	0.95	1.18	1.24	1.29	1.21	1.33	1.64
Anterior lateral eye diameter	0.11	0.08	0.08	0.1	0.07	0.08	0.07	0.1
Posterior lateral eye diameter	0.1	0.07	0.06	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.06	0.07
Posterior median eye diameter	0.08	0.06	0.06	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.06	0.07
Legs
Relative length ratio lenght of the first leg femur / length of carapace	0.87	0.87	0.82	0.94	0.82	0.9	0.89	0.96
Spines on proapical femur I	1	1	2	1	1	1	1	1
Spines on proapical femur II	2(1)	1	2	2	1	2	2	2
Spines on apical femur III	3(5)	4	5	5(6)	3	3	7	4(5)
Spines on dorsal femur IV	1	1	4	4	1(2)	1(2)	3	5
Spines on prodorsal tibia III	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Spines on retrodorsal tibia III	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on proventral tibia III	2	1(2)	2	2	1	2	2	2
Spines on ventral tibia III	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on apical ventral tibia III	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on prodorsal tibia IV	2	2	3(2)	4(3)	3(2)	2	2	3
Spines on retrodorsal tibia IV	3(4)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Spines on proventral tibia IV	2	2	2	3(2)	2(3)	2	2	3
Spines on retroventral tibia IV	2(1)	2	2	0(1)	2	2
Spines on ventral tibia IV	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on apical ventral tibia IV	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on prodorsal metatarsus III	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Spines on retrodorsal metatarsus III	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on proventral metatarsus III	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on retroventral metatarsus III	1	1	1	1
Spines on apical ventral metatarsus III	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2
Spines on prodorsal metatarsus IV	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
Spines on retrodorsal metatarsus IV	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Spines on proventral metatarsus IV	2	2	2	2	2(3)	2	3	2
Spines on retroventral metatarsus IV	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Spines on apical ventral metatarsus IV	2	2	2	2	2(1)	2	2	2

......continued on the next page TABLE 1. (Continued)

Harpactea korenkoi sp. nov.	Harpactea henriquesi sp. nov.	Harpactea pekari sp. nov.	Harpactea crespoi sp. nov.	Harpactea tavirensis	Harpactea adicensis sp. nov.	Harpactea krejcii sp. nov.	Harpactea dolanskyi sp. nov.
Length of coxa I	0.94	0.62	0.71	0.69	0.71	0.77	0.8	1.08
Length of femur I	1.83	1.2	1.33	1.51	1.42	1.52	1.59	2.12
Length of patella I	1.28	0.87	0.84	1.02	0.95	0.99	1.06	1.59
Length of tibia I	1.59	1.02	1.15	1.38	1.18	1.3	1.4	1.95
Length of metatarsus I	1.35	0.93	1	1.2	1.04	1.23	1.23	1.66
Length of tarsus I	0.46	0.4	0.38	0.44	0.4	0.43	0.43	0.53
Length of leg I	7.45	5.04	5.42	6.24	5.71	6.24	6.51	8.94
Length of coxa II	0.77	0.49	0.6	0.64	0.62	0.6	0.67	0.89
Length of femur II	1.66	0.98	1.2	1.44	1.24	1.35	1.45	1.98
Length of patella II	1.13	0.69	0.8	0.98	0.89	0.84	0.96	1.42
Length of tibia II	1.47	0.84	1.07	1.22	1.11	1.16	1.3	1.78
Length of metatarsus II	1.28	0.75	0.98	1.15	0.95	1.06	1.13	1.59
Length of tarsus II	0.46	0.38	0.36	0.44	0.38	0.41	0.41	0.51
Length of leg II	6.77	4.13	5	5.88	5.19	5.42	5.93	8.17
Length of coxa III	0.51	0.27	0.38	0.4	0.4	0.39	0.41	0.58
Length of femur III	1.35	0.84	1	1.2	1.07	1.11	1.21	1.61
Length of patella III	0.7	0.4	0.47	0.51	0.53	0.51	0.6	0.82
Length of tibia III	1.16	0.67	0.78	0.95	0.8	0.89	1.04	1.47
Length of metatarsus III	1.21	0.75	0.93	1.11	0.93	1.04	1.16	1.61
Length of tarsus III	0.39	0.38	0.36	0.42	0.36	0.36	0.39	0.48
Length of leg III	5.3	3.31	3.91	4.6	4.08	4.29	4.8	6.58
Length of coxa IV	0.6	0.38	0.47	0.51	0.53	0.48	0.55	0.72
Length of femur IV	1.9	1.22	1.38	1.73	1.55	1.61	1.74	2.34
Length of patella IV	0.96	0.62	0.62	0.84	0.8	0.75	0.84	1.16
Length of tibia IV	1.69	1.07	1.27	1.55	1.33	1.37	1.52	2.12
Length of metatarsus IV	1.83	1.09	1.29	1.69	1.49	1.52	1.66	2.36
Length of tarsus IV	0.51	0.42	0.4	0.47	0.38	0.43	0.48	0.6
Length of leg IV	7.5	4.8	5.42	6.79	6.08	6.17	6.8	9.3
Length of leg spine	0.29	0.27	0.27	0.27	0.18	0.24	0.27	0.43
Abdomen
Length	2.51	2	1.93	2.02	2.12	2.31	2.07	2.58
Length of hair on dorsal abdomen	0.07	0.08	0.07	0.08	0.07	0.1	0.08	0.12
Chelicerae
Basal segment length	0.72	0.53	0.6	0.62	0.62	0.67	0.72	0.77
Fang length	0.43	0.27	0.33	0.36	0.31	0.39	0.39	0.53

......continued on the next page TABLE 1. (Continued)

Harpactea korenkoi sp. nov.	Harpactea henriquesi sp. nov.	Harpactea pekari sp. nov.	Harpactea crespoi sp. nov.	Harpactea tavirensis	Harpactea adicensis sp. nov.	Harpactea krejcii sp. nov.	Harpactea dolanskyi sp. nov.
Pedipalps
Length of gnathocoxa	0.77	0.53	0.62	0.67	0.69	0.65	0.72	0.75
Length of palpal coxa	0.36	0.24	0.31	0.29	0.31	0.29	0.67	0.41
Length of palpal femur	1.23	0.62	0.73	0.98	0.87	0.92	1.01	1.25
Length of palpal patella	0.8	0.36	0.4	0.47	0.53	0.58	0.58	0.75
Length of palpal tibia	0.55	0.31	0.33	0.49	0.4	0.46	0.51	0.63
Length of palpal tarsus	0.89	0.4	0.42	0.71	0.58	0.67	0.65	0.77
Length of palp	3.83	1.93	2.2	2.93	2.69	2.92	3.42	3.81
Bulbus diameter	0.84	0.33	0.35	0.51	0.58	0.53	0.7	0.7

The vulva is of the type minoccii . It resembles H. subiasi but it can be distinguished from the later species by larger paired posterior diverticles, easy to overlook in H. subiasi ( Fig. 7B —pd) and by more compact hooks of the anchor-shaped anterior arc ( Fig. 7A ven.). Description. The female has not been known so far. The somatic characters correspond with those described for the holotype male. The vulva is well developed. The anterior arc is high in ventral view. The median rod carries large crest, it does not contain any spermatheca. The anterior arc with median rod strongly resemble anchor in the ventral/dorsal view. The transversal bar carries a couple of translucent membranous pockets ( Fig. 7A ). Ecology. In humid leaf litter under trees or bush on shaded slopes. Females lay eggs at the beginning of spring. The presence of independent juveniles at the same time suggests a two-year life cycle. Distribution. Relatively large area comprising southern Spain (Ferrandez 1990: 37, fig. 3; Ferrandez & Ferrandez 1990: 49, fig. 4; Machado & Ferrandez 1991: 58 , fig. 8) and southern Portugal .