New euagrid spider species from Thailand and Malaysia, and new localities of Leptothele bencha (Arachnida: Araneae) Author Schwendinger, Peter J. Muséum d’histoire naturelle de Genève, C. P. 6434, CH- 1211 Genève 6, Switzerland Author Lehmann-Graber, Christina Muséum d’histoire naturelle de Genève, C. P. 6434, CH- 1211 Genève 6, Switzerland Author Hongpadharakiree, Komson Sirinath Rajini Mangrove Ecosystem Learning Center, Pranburi, Prachuab Khiri Khan, Thailand Author Syuhadah, Nurul The Liphistius Project, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia text Revue suisse de Zoologie 2020 127 2 423 453 journal article 123209 10.35929/RSZ.0031 72faffc3-802a-4d40-944d-4f6e5f002bbb 0035-418 5743952 Leptothele Raven & Schwendinger, 1995 Leptothele Raven & Schwendinger, 1995: 636-637 . Type species: Leptothele bencha Raven & Schwendinger, 1995 by monotypy and by designation. Species included: Leptothele bencha Raven & Schwendinger, 1995 and L. chang sp. nov. Revised diagnosis: Distinguished from Phyxioschema by males lacking a prolateral band of elongated spinules and by possessing a much shorter ventral spur ( Figs 3B, E , 5E , 6G cf. Raven, 1981: fig. 7; Schwendinger, 2009 : figs 2D, 4C, 5C, 9C, 12C, 15C) and a low transversal subdistal ventral ridge on tibia II ( Figs 3 B-C, E-F, I-J, 5E, 6G-K), and by possessing a single, widely conical or mound-like ventral process instead of 2-3 longitudinal ridges on metatarsus II ( Figs 3 B-C, E-F, I-J, 5E, 6G-I cf. Raven, 1981a : fig. 7; Schwendinger, 2009 : figs 2D, 6J, 10J, 13J, 16K, 19L). Females with Fig. 2. Localities of Leptothele spp. and Malayathele spp. on the Thai-Malay Peninsula. The coast of Sumatra is omitted. 1 - Ko Sirey ( L. bencha ); 2 - Ko Yao Noi ( L. bencha ); 3 - Khao Phanom Bencha ( L. bencha , type locality); 4 - Thab Khaek - Hang Nak Hill and Khlong Jilat ( L. bencha ); 5 - Ban Chong Phlie ( L. bencha ); 6 - Ko Lanta ( L. bencha ); 7 - Ko Muk ( L. bencha ); 8 - Ko Libong ( L. bencha ); 9 - Ko Sukon ( L. bencha ); 10 - Ko Tarutao ( L. bencha ); 11 - Tham Khao Chang Hai ( L. chang sp. nov. , type locality); 12 - Ulu Groh ( M. ulu sp. nov. , type locality); 13 - Chenderiang ( Malayathele sp. ); 14 - Cameron Highlands ( M. cameronensis sp. nov. , type locality; M. ulu sp. nov. ); 15 - Fraser’s Hill ( M. maculosa sp. nov. , type locality); 16 - Genting Highlands ( M. maculosa sp. nov. ); 17 - Templer Park ( M. kanching sp. nov. ; type locality); 18 - Ulu Gombak ( M. kanching sp. nov. ); 19 - Jeram Pasu Waterfall ( Malayathele sp. ); 20 - Singapore ( Euagridae / Dipluridae gen. sp.). Key to the genera of Euagridae in Asia: 1A Males with a band of elongated spinules on prolateral side of tibia II ( Raven, 1981a : fig. 7), with a distinct, quite long spur (carrying megaspines) on ventral side of tibia II, and with 2-3 longitudinal keels on ventral side of metatarsus II (proventral one reduced to a small cone in P. sayamense Schwendinger, 2009 : fig. 13I-J); patella I with a row of short, sigmoid or (rarely) curved retroventral-distal spines ( Schwendinger, 2009 : figs 3L, 6F, 10F, 13F, 16F); femur II with a long proventral band of hooked spinules (almost or actually reaching distal margin of leg article; Schwendinger, 2009 : figs 2B, 4E, 5E, 9E, 12E, 15E, 18E); palpal tarsus with strong distal bristles (not spines; Schwendinger, 2009 : fig. 2C). Females with or without secondary receptacles, if present then situated posterior of median receptacles ( Schwendinger, 2009 : figs 3A-I, 7, 11, 14, 17, 20; Schwendinger & Zonstein, 2011 : figs 4-5, 8). Both sexes usually with spines on tarsi of posterior legs (most males of P. suthepium Raven & Schwendinger, 1989 and some P. eripnastes Schwendinger, 2009 without). Central Asia and all over Thailand ..... ............................................................................................................................................................. Phyxioschema 1B Males without a band of elongated spinules on prolateral side of tibia II ( Figs 5E , 12G ), with a rather indistinct short spur (carrying megaspines) on ventral side of tibia II, and with 1-2 mound-like, conical or tooth-shaped processes on ventral side of metatarsus II (exception: a short retroventral keel in M. cameronensis sp. nov. , Fig. 11 G-J); patella I with a row of long, not sigmoid bristles ( Figs 6F , 8F , 11F , 13I ) or with only a single curved spine retroventrally-distally ( Fig. 15E ); femur II with a short proventral band of hooked spinules (distant from distal margin of leg article; Figs 5F , 10B ); palpal tarsus with distinct distal spines ( Figs 3A, D, H , 6 B-E, 8A-E, 11A-D, 15A-C). Females without secondary receptacles ( Figs 4 , 7 , 9 , 11K , 16 ), if exceptionally present, then situated anterior of median receptacles ( Fig. 7C ). Both sexes without spines on tarsi of posterior legs. Southern Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2A Small body size (carapace length in males 1.52-2.73), distal article of PLS pseudosegmented ( Fig. 5I ), no metatarsal preening combs in both sexes. Males with at least two megaspines and with a transversal subdistal ridge on ventral side of tibia II ( Figs 3 B-C, E-F, I-J, 5E, 6G-K); metatarsus II with a single conical or mound-like process on ventral side ( Figs 3 B-C, E-F, I-J, 5E, 6G-I); tarsi I-II not ventrally bulged ( Fig. 5H ). Females with quite long spermathecal trunks; stalks of median receptacles not sclerotised ( Figs 4 , 7 ). Southern Thailand ................................ Leptothele 2B Very small body size (carapace length in males 1.11-1.44), distal article of PLS not pseudosegmented ( Fig. 12 J-K), metatarsal preening combs present on legs II-IV in both sexes. Males with only one ventral megaspine and without a subdistal ridge on ventral side of tibia II ( Figs 8 H-K, 10B, 11G-J, 12G, 13J-M, 15F-H); metatarsus II with two small conical processes, a proventral and a retroventral one ( Figs 13 J-K, M, 15F-H), or with only a small conical retroventral process ( Fig. 8 I-J), or with a small conical proventral and a keel-shaped retroventral processes ( Fig. 11 G-J); tarsi I-II ventrally bulged ( Fig. 10D ). Females with rather short spermathecal trunks; stalks of median receptacles sclerotised ( Figs 9 , 11K , 14 , 16 ). Peninsular Malaysia ........................................ Malayathele gen. nov. Key to the species of Leptothele : 1A Small body size (carapace lengths in males 1.52-2.04). Males normally with two ventral megaspines ( Fig. 3C, F ; single asymmetrical exception, Fig. 3J ) and always without wrinkles behind and in front of subdistal-ventral ridge on tibia II ( Fig. 3C, F, J ); ventral process on metatarsus II widely conical ( Fig. 3B, E, I ); bulbous part of palpal organ as long as wide or wider than long ( Fig. 3A, D, H, G ). Females with quite long and narrow spermathecal trunks; stalks of median receptacles mostly shorter than corresponding heads ( Fig. 4 A-D), except for females from Ko Siray ( Fig. 4 E-F) .................................................................................................................................. L. bencha 1B Larger body size (carapace lengths in males 2.30-2.73). Males with 2-3 ventral megaspines and with wrinkles behind and in front of subdistal ridge on tibia II ( Fig. 6 H-K); ventral process on metatarsus II less distinct, developed as a low, wide mound ( Fig. 6G ); bulbous part of palpal organ longer than wide ( Fig. 6 A-E). Females with relatively shorter and wider spermathecal trunks; stalks of median receptacles very long and thin, almost twice of corresponding head lengths ( Fig. 7 ) ................................................................................. L. chang sp. nov. vulvae quite similar to those of Phyxioschema females, but stalks of receptacles not sclerotised and usually no secondary receptacles present [one exception – unsymmetrical and situated anterior of median receptacle – in L. chang sp. nov. ( Fig. 7C ); secondary receptacles in Phyxioschema , if present, posterior of or at same level as median receptacle, see Schwendinger, 2009 : figs 3A-I, 11, 17 and Schwendinger & Zonstein, 2011 : figs 4-5, 8]. Metatarsal preening combs absent (present in P. suthepium and P. erawan Schwendinger, 2009 , but not in other Phyxioschema ). Distinguished from Malayathele gen. nov. by distal article of PLS with a pseudosegmentation ( Fig. 5I cf. Fig. 12 J-K) and by lacking metatarsal preening combs in both sexes; males with 2-3 ( Figs 3C, F , 6 H-K; exceptionally more, Fig. 3J ) megaspines (only one in Malayathele gen. nov. , Figs 8 I-J, 11I-J, 13J, 15F) and a transversal subdistal ridge ( Figs 3 B-C, E-F, I-J, 6G-K; absent in Malayathele gen. nov. ) on ventral side of tibia II, and with a single, widely conical or mound-like median process on metatarsus II ( Figs 3 B-C, E-F, I-J, 6G-I; 1-2 small conical processes or one conical process plus a short keel-shaped process in Malayathele gen. nov. , Figs 8 H-K, 11G-J, 13J-M, 15F-H); tarsi I-II not ventrally bulged ( Fig. 5H cf. Fig. 10D ). Females distinguished from those of Malayathele gen. nov. by possessing median receptacular stalks with unsclerotised walls ( Figs 4 , 7 cf. Figs 9 , 11K , 14 , 16 ). Revised character: teeth on unpaired leg claws either all sessile ( Fig. 1 F-G) or proximal teeth raised on indistinct common base ( Fig. 1E, H ). Distribution: Southern Thailand ( Fig. 2 , localities 1-11).