A review of the subfamily Picobiinae Johnston and Kethley, 1973 (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Syringophilidae) Author Skoracki, Maciej Author Sikora, Bozena Author Spicer, Greg S. text Zootaxa 2016 2016-05-19 4113 1 1 95 journal article 39032 10.11646/zootaxa.4113.1.1 80c5d033-a100-47c9-afad-53ff7fcf37a4 1175-5326 271508 8B8CDC5A-304F-407F-A06F-F350F916DCD1 Key to species of the genus Neopicobia (Females) 1. Hysteronotal shields well developed, bearing bases of setae d1 and e2 . Agenital and genital plates present … / freya species group /............................................................................................. 2 - Hysteronotal shields reduced to small rings surrounded bases of setae d1 or absent. Agenital and genital plates absent … / anthi species group /........................................................................................ 4 2. Pygidial shield with well developed wing-like lobes. Setae 4c situated out of coxal fields IV.............................................................................................. N. hepburni Glowska and Laniecka, 2014 - Pygidial shield without wing-like lobes. Setae 4c situated on coxal fields IV...................................... 3 3. Length ratios of setae vi : ve : si 1:1.8:2–2.2, f1 : f2 1:4.5–5.5 times. Agenital plates fused to genital plate. In males, setae d2 are about 3.5–4 times longer than e2 .............................................. N. ea Skoracki and Unsoeld, 2014 - Length ratios of setae vi : ve : si 1:1.3–1.5:1.5–1.7, f1 : f2 1:11. Agenital plates not fused to genital plate. In males, setae d2 are 9 times longer than e2...................................................... N. freya Skoracki and Unsoeld, 2014 4. Setae f1 situated out of pygidial shield.......................... N. troglodytes ( Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 ) - Setae f1 situated on pygidial shield....................................................................... 5 5. Hysteronotal shield as small punctate rings surrounded bases of setae d1 ..................................................................................................... N. cardinalis ( Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 ) - Hysteronotal shields absent............................................................................. 6 6. Setae ag1 and ag3 no more than twice longer than ag2 ....................................................... 7 - Setae ag1 and ag3 4–5 times longer than ag2............................ N. modularis ( Skoracki and Magowski, 2001 ) 7. Setae ag1 and ag3 twice longer than ag2 .................................................................. 8 - Setae ag1 and ag3 1.4–1.6 times longer than ag2 ............................................................. 9 8. Coxal fields III and IV densely punctate. Pygidial shield punctate... N. carpodacus ( Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 ) - Coxal fields III and IV apunctate. Pygidial shield apunctate.................................. N. anthi ( Fritsch, 1958 ) 9. Coxal fields I and II apunctate. Length of setae si , c1 , d1 and e2 70 –75, 105, 80–95 and 85–100, respectively...................................................................................................... N. pari sp. nov. - Coxal fields I and II punctate. Length of setae si , c1 , d1 and e2 165–175, 180–190, 165–170 and 155–170, respectively.............................................................. N. ictericus ( Skoracki and Glowska, 2010 ) comb. nov.