Studies on chevron crickets: Contribution to the knowledge of Lutosinae / ini taxa (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)
Author
Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J.
0000-0001-5646-0602
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Grupo de Investigación en Artrópodos “ Kumangui ”. ojccorthoptera @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5646 - 0602
ojccorthoptera@gmail.com
Author
García, Alexander García
0000-0001-5646-0602
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Grupo de Investigación en Artrópodos “ Kumangui ”. ojccorthoptera @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5646 - 0602 & agarciag @ udistrital. edu. co; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 9905 - 003 X
ojccorthoptera@gmail.com
Author
Nos, Maria Del Pilar Castella-
0000-0003-3551-4370
Universidad INCCA de Colombia. Grupo en Ecología Evolutiva y Biogeografía Tropical ECOBIT. & https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 3551 - 4370
Author
Sarmiento, Juan Pablo Prias
0000-0002-5602-3370
Universidad INCCA de Colombia. Grupo en Ecología Evolutiva y Biogeografía Tropical ECOBIT. & https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 5602 - 3370
Author
Tavares, Gustavo Costa
Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Av. Augusto Correa # 1 66075 - 110, Belém, PA, Brazil. Grupo de Estudos de Artrópodes da Amazônia (GEAA).
text
Zootaxa
2022
2022-08-29
5178
4
347
379
journal article
133175
10.11646/zootaxa.5178.4.3
80cbc663-bb6f-4ce3-a069-91bd0858c006
1175-5326
7031765
24BCAB12-3C2C-4BD0-BD23-5027C9AC9A1F
Dolichochaeta inermis
(Salfi, 1925)
comb. rev.
Comments.
This species was described from
Chile
as a variety of
Pherterus cubaensis
. Additional specimens have not been recorded since its description, and no additional study of the
type
specimen has been carried out, so the association of this species is not clarified.
Johns (1997)
placed this species in
Dolichochaeta
, since his description better fits that genus. However,
Gorochov (2001a)
moved it back into
Lutosa
without justification, but he keeps that this species is dubious and should not be included in
Lutosa
. It is suggested to move the species back to
Dolichochaeta
, since the original description indicates characters more akin to
Rhaphidophoridae
than to
Anostostomatidae
.