Studies on chevron crickets: Contribution to the knowledge of Lutosinae / ini taxa (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) Author Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J. 0000-0001-5646-0602 Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Grupo de Investigación en Artrópodos “ Kumangui ”. ojccorthoptera @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5646 - 0602 ojccorthoptera@gmail.com Author García, Alexander García 0000-0001-5646-0602 Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Grupo de Investigación en Artrópodos “ Kumangui ”. ojccorthoptera @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5646 - 0602 & agarciag @ udistrital. edu. co; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 9905 - 003 X ojccorthoptera@gmail.com Author Nos, Maria Del Pilar Castella- 0000-0003-3551-4370 Universidad INCCA de Colombia. Grupo en Ecología Evolutiva y Biogeografía Tropical ECOBIT. & https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 3551 - 4370 Author Sarmiento, Juan Pablo Prias 0000-0002-5602-3370 Universidad INCCA de Colombia. Grupo en Ecología Evolutiva y Biogeografía Tropical ECOBIT. & https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 5602 - 3370 Author Tavares, Gustavo Costa Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Av. Augusto Correa # 1 66075 - 110, Belém, PA, Brazil. Grupo de Estudos de Artrópodes da Amazônia (GEAA). text Zootaxa 2022 2022-08-29 5178 4 347 379 journal article 133175 10.11646/zootaxa.5178.4.3 80cbc663-bb6f-4ce3-a069-91bd0858c006 1175-5326 7031765 24BCAB12-3C2C-4BD0-BD23-5027C9AC9A1F Dolichochaeta inermis (Salfi, 1925) comb. rev. Comments. This species was described from Chile as a variety of Pherterus cubaensis . Additional specimens have not been recorded since its description, and no additional study of the type specimen has been carried out, so the association of this species is not clarified. Johns (1997) placed this species in Dolichochaeta , since his description better fits that genus. However, Gorochov (2001a) moved it back into Lutosa without justification, but he keeps that this species is dubious and should not be included in Lutosa . It is suggested to move the species back to Dolichochaeta , since the original description indicates characters more akin to Rhaphidophoridae than to Anostostomatidae .