Taxonomic study of Chinese species of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) III: a review of oak-dwelling species Author Li, Hu Author Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu. Author Dai, Ren-Huai Author Li, Zi-Zhong text Zootaxa 2014 3760 3 351 368 journal article 46532 10.11646/zootaxa.3760.3.3 aa7962b2-ab22-466b-8f6b-46a0ffaae00d 1175-5326 230528 96CCE33F-8EC9-4B9B-A59D-689DE3515105 Key to species of oak-dwelling Macropsis in China 1. Body colour bright-green or yellowish-green (Figs. 3–4, 22)......................... M . jozankeana ( Matsumura, 1912 ) – Body colour yellowish brown to brown without green tinge................................................... 2 2. Posterior margin of male pygofer process serrated at middle.................................................... 3 – Posterior margin of male pygofer process smooth, not serrated at middle......................................... 4 3. Male pygofer process with 8–10 regular denticles posteriorly and abruptly narrowing beaklike tip (Fig. 109).............................................................................. M . meifengensis Huang & Viraktamath, 1993 – Male pygofer process with 2–5 irregular denticles posteriorly and wider tip (Figs. 70–77)..... M . irenae Viraktamath, 1981 4. Male pygofer process long, distinctly extended beyond dorsal margin of pygofer side................................ 5 – Male pygofer process of moderately long, not extended beyond dorsal margin of pygofer side........................ 6 5. Male pygofer process slightly sinuated, and directly pointed caudodorsally (Figs. 99–100)............................................................................................... M . longiprocessa Li & Tishechkin sp. nov. – Male pygofer process strongly sinuated, and with apex twisted caudally (Fig. 118).......... M . rubrosternalis Kuoh, 1992 6. Male pygofer process short, reaching middle of dorsal margin of pygofer, widened and abruptly narrowed in distal half (Figs. 89–90).............................................................. M . latiprocessa Li & Tishechkin sp. nov. – Male pygofer process longer, surpassing middle of dorsal margin of pygofer, subapex slightly expanded then gradually nar- rowed to apex....................................................................................... 7 7. Male pygofer process parallel-sided, not expanded in distal half in lateral view (Figs. 51–56); aedeagal shaft upturned dorsally in distal 1/3, with rounded apex (Figs. 61–64)............................... M . huangbana Li & Tishechkin sp. nov. – Male pygofer process distinctly expanded in distal half in lateral view; aedeagal shaft upturned dorsally in distal 2/3 or 1/2, with relatively sharpened apex.......................................................................... 8 8. Apex of male pygofer process relatively broad and bent antedorsally (Fig. 32); aedeagal shaft gradually upturned dorsally in distal 1/2 (Fig. 34).......................................................... M . hainanensis Li, Dai & Li, 2012 – Apex of male pygofer process relatively slender and bent caudodorsally (Fig. 37); aedeagal shaft abruptly upturned dorsally in distal 2/3 (Fig. 39)............................................................ M . matsumurana ( China , 1925 )