Polyphyly of the traditional family Flabellinidae affects a major group of Nudibranchia: aeolidacean taxonomic reassessment with descriptions of several new families, genera, and species (Mollusca, Gastropoda) Author Korshunova, Tatiana Author Martynov, Alexander Author Bakken, Torkild Author Evertsen, Jussi Author Fletcher, Karin Author Mudianta, I Wayan Author Saito, Hiroshi Author Lundin, Kennet Author Michael Schroedl, Author Picton, Bernard text ZooKeys 2017 717 1 139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.717.21885 journal article http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.717.21885 1313-2970-717-1 C19B43B1B3214CB1B1B2A246CEAC56BC Calmella Eliot, 1910 Figs 33, 34 Type species. Eolidia cavolini Verany , 1846. Diagnosis. Body narrow. Notal edge completely absent. Cerata on short stalks in several groups. Rhinophores smooth, larger than oral tentacles or similar in size. Anterior foot corners present. Anus mixed: pleuroproctic shifted towards dorsal acleioproctic position. Distinct oral glands. Rachidian teeth with narrow compressed cusp and distinct denticles. Lateral teeth weakly denticulated to smooth with attenuated process basally. Single distal receptaculum seminis. Moderately long prostatic non-granulated vas deferens. Penis conical. Species included. Calmella cavolini ( Verany , 1846) (Fig. 33) (original description in Verany 1846, detailed description in Schmekel and Portmann 1982 ), Calmella gaditana (Cervera, Garcia-Gomez & Garcia , 1987), comb. n. (original description in Cervera et al. 1987 , = " Flabellina " confusa Gonzalez-Duarte et al. 2008 , original description in Gonzalez-Duarte et al. 2008 ; for discussion see Furfaro et al. 2017 ), Calmella bandeli Marcus, 1976 (original description in Marcus 1976 ). Remarks. The genus Calmella was established by Eliot (1910) and since that time it has never been synonymised with Flabellina , until the most recent Furfaro et al. (2017) study. According to the present phylogenetic analysis Calmella is valid, related to the true Flabellina s. str. (Fig. 2) and differs morphologically regarding its much less ramified and raised ceratal stalks and presence of smooth rhinophores. See remarks also under the genus Piseinotecus .