Genetic and chemical diversity of the toxic herb Jacobaea vulgaris Gaertn. (syn. Senecio jacobaea L.) in Northern Germany
Author
Jung, Stefanie
∗ & Systematic Botany, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
Author
Lauter, Jan
Author
Hartung, Nicole M.
Author
These, Anja
Author
Hamscher, Gerd
Author
Wissemann, Volker
text
Phytochemistry
2020
112235
2020-04-30
172
1
9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112235
journal article
10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112235
1873-3700
8294291
2.1. PA profile of
J. vulgaris
We coupled chromatography with high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR-MS) in order to detect low PAs contents and different structures of PAs. A total of 98 different PA structures were determined in 367
J. vulgaris
plant samples of which 347 were located in
Schleswig-Holstein
and 20, respectively 2 populations, in
Hesse
(
Fig. 1
,
Table.1
). At the time of the study, 13 of these 98 PAs were available as reference standards and could therefore be unambiguously determined. The most abundant PA in
J. vulgaris
individuals was erucifoline-
N
-oxide (16.33%) followed by senecionine-
N
-oxide_senecivernine-
N
-oxide (13.75%) and jacobine-
N
-oxide (10.84%) (
Table 2
).
Fig. 2
shows the structural formula of the most abundant PAs and a comprehensive list of all identified PAs is shown in
Table 5
.
The average total PA content of an individual was 1032 ±
365 mg
/ kg corresponding to 0.1% of dry weight. The mean amount of PA between populations differed from the lowest 777 ±
237 mg
/kg of dry weight (Heiligenhafen) to the highest 1666 ±
476 mg
/kg of dry weight (Breklum) (
Fig. 3A
). Both locations in
Hesse
show similar sums of PAs when compared to the locations in
Schleswig-Holstein
. Population 17 (Breklum) has a higher PA content, than the remaining populations (Kruskal-Wallis, p <0.0001). However, given our hypothesis, this content might not be relevant for selection by big herbivores, as all found concentrations do not reach the level of harmfulness for big grazing mammals like cattle. For insect herbivores it is known that the effect of the concentration of PAs depends on both PA and insect species (
Macel et al., 2005
). Nonetheless compared to other investigations in
Germany
, we found lower overall PA contents in dry weight (
These et al., 2013
).
Explanations for different contents of PAs are rare. A possible influence might be soil composition and nutrient availability. This was shown by
Kirk et al. (2010)
who found higher PA concentrations in plants growing in soils with limited nutrients.
Kirk et al. (2010)
also suggested that there is no selective pressure on PA content by different herbivores. However, other studies did not point towards relevant effects of locational factors including soil composition or herbivory insects on PA content (
Joosten et al., 2009
;
Van der Meijden et al., 1989
;
Vrieling and Wijk, 1994
), indicating the need for further research in this field.
PA diversity was investigated by counting the different PAs that are produced by individuals and subsequently averaged within populations (
Fig. 3B
). Individuals from population 5 (70 ± 2), 6 (71 ± 3), 15 (73 ± 3), 16 (74 ± 3), and 19 (71 ± 3) produced a greater range of different PAs than the average of all individuals hence are chemically more diverse. Population 2 (49 ± 2), 3 (51 ± 2), 12 (57 ± 3), 23 (49 ± 3), 24 (50 ± 2), 25 (51 ± 5) and 27 (57 ± 2) in contrast produced a lower range of different PAs (ANOVA, F (27, 706) = 18.86, P <0.0001). Population 15 was genetically investigated, too and shows one of the highest genetic diversity values (
Table 4
).
Table 1
Location of collection sites of
J. vulgaris
populations with number of individuals used for chemical analysis (sample size PA analysis), number of individuals used for genetic analysis (sample size AFLP analysis), and coordinates. Chemotype of locations including significant differences between relative abundance of erucifoline and jacobine. - = not used, ns = not significant, *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001.
Nr. |
Location |
Sample size |
Sample size AFLP analysis |
Lat. |
Long. |
Chemotype |
PA analysis |
1 |
Rauischholzhausen |
11 |
9 |
50.762199 |
8.879012 |
Mixed, ns |
2 |
Cleeberg |
9 |
– |
50.454095 |
8.556469 |
Erucifoline, ** |
3 |
Stodthagen |
9 |
9 |
54.281263 |
10.115665 |
Mixed, ns |
4 |
Goosefeld |
15 |
– |
54.428561 |
9.808093 |
Jacobine, * |
5 |
Dazendorf |
15 |
8 |
54.362362 |
10.944441 |
Erucifoline, *** |
6 |
Neustadt |
15 |
7 |
54.088625 |
10.798694 |
Mixed, ns |
7 |
Eutin |
15 |
– |
54.133031 |
10.6095 |
Erucifoline, *** |
8 |
Mühlenbarbek |
15 |
53.954671 |
9.654996 |
Jacobine, * |
9 |
Drögen Eider |
15 |
– |
54.164423 |
10.123386 |
Jacobine, * |
10 |
Bordesholm |
15 |
– |
54.193261 |
10.047096 |
Jacobine, * |
11 |
Preetz |
15 |
– |
54.235568 |
10.296812 |
Jacobine, * |
12 |
Langwedel |
11 |
– |
54.214269 |
9.921167 |
Jacobine, * |
13 |
Rastorf |
8 |
– |
54.275717 |
10.300127 |
Mixed, ns |
14 |
Dithmarscher Geest |
15 |
8 |
54.130057 |
9.254603 |
Jacobine, * |
15 |
Heiligenhafen |
15 |
9 |
54.377679 |
10.931665 |
Erucifoline, ** |
16 |
Neumünster |
15 |
– |
54.039343 |
9.980943 |
Jacobine, * |
17 |
Breklum |
15 |
– |
54.607393 |
8.987367 |
Erucifoline, *** |
18 |
Flensburg |
15 |
7 |
54.728386 |
9.367222 |
Mixed, ns |
19 |
Füsing |
15 |
10 |
54.524689 |
9.637699 |
Jacobine, * |
20 |
Hamburg |
15 |
8 |
53.643896 |
9.928421 |
Jacobine, * |
21 |
Rehburg |
16 |
– |
54.284511 |
10.288206 |
Mixed, ns |
22 |
Schwarzenbek |
15 |
– |
53.553038 |
10.414365 |
Mixed, ns |
23 |
Niebüll |
15 |
– |
54.767187 |
8.866052 |
Mixed, ns |
24 |
Lottorf |
6 |
– |
54.453106 |
9.571611 |
Mixed, ns |
25 |
Barkauer See |
14 |
– |
54.086987 |
10.641261 |
Jacobine, *** |
26 |
Forstkrug |
15 |
– |
53.486318 |
10.733531 |
Mixed, ns |
27 |
Bültsee |
13 |
– |
54.497838 |
9.753609 |
Mixed, ns |
Table 2
Description of the ten most abundant PA structures detected in
J. vulgaris
plants in Northern Germany. Senecionine and senecivernine as well as their
N
-oxides were respectively quantified as sum due to coelution. SEM: standard error of the mean.
average |
SEM |
Minimum |
Maximum |
[mg/kg] |
[mg/kg] |
[mg/kg] |
Erucifoline-
N
-Oxide
|
168.43 |
6.93 |
1.10 |
487.79 |
Senecionine-
N
-
|
141.87 |
5.77 |
8.23 |
671.95 |
Oxide_Senecivernine-
N
-
|
Oxide |
Jacobine-
N
-Oxide
|
111.82 |
5.10 |
1.45 |
473.07 |
Jacobine |
90.50 |
4.10 |
0.00 |
393.19 |
Erucifoline |
83.03 |
3.90 |
0.94 |
431.43 |
Seneciphylline-
N
-Oxide
|
82.33 |
4.44 |
2.48 |
475.52 |
Seneciphylline |
64.05 |
3.36 |
1.72 |
457.44 |
Retrorsine-
N
-Oxide
|
54.34 |
1.84 |
6.58 |
204.07 |
Senecionine_Senecivernine |
48.91 |
2.45 |
2.53 |
344.73 |
Retrorsine |
19.43 |
0,71 |
1.80 |
97.72 |
Fig. 2.
Structural formula of the 6 most abundant PAs in this study.
Previous studies have specified three (
Macel et al., 2004
) respectively four chemotypes of
J. vulgaris
(
Witte et al., 1992
)
. According to the dominant PAs, a jacobine
type
, an erucifoline
type
, a senecionine
type
and a mixed
type
were assigned. We found mainly individuals with both PA jacobine as well as erucifoline. However, ANOVA revealed that averaged trough all populations, 11 populations contained a significantly higher relative share of jacobine. In contrast, 5 populations produced more erucifoline (
Fig. 3C
), confirming Marcel at al. (2004) who postulated that erucifoline chemotypes are not only restricted to South-East Europe. Moreover, one population (10) contained no erucifoline and 5 populations contained no jacobine at all (2, 5, 7, 15, and 17) or less than 2% (
Fig. 4
). Remarkably individuals from Population 3 (Stodhagen) produced neither much of jacobine nor erucifoline but plenty seneciphylline and its
N
-oxide. However, our data regarding PA composition widely spread so that individuals from the same population produce considerably different amounts of different PAs. As we cannot figure out any consistency or dominant PA profile we suggest that there might not be a direct evolutionary constraint as a selective pressure on PA composition in
J. vulgaris
at all. At least for specialist herbivores other studies confirm that they do not put any selective pressure on PA composition (
Macel et al., 2002
;
Macel and Vrieling, 2003
;
Vrieling and Boer, 1999
). In contrast, the same authors showed that different PAs had different effects on generalist and specialist herbivores and thus hypothesized that herbivores could play a role in the evolution of PA diversity (
Macel et al., 2005
;
Macel and Klinkhamer, 2010
). Furthermore, soil constitution and its content of microorganisms can affect PA composition (
Joosten et al., 2009
). Although diversity within populations does exist, averaged values of our data do not support any directed evolution, therefore we interpret the overall diversity of PAs in
J. vulgaris
, lacking specific chemotypes to be the result of a panmictic metapopulation with no directing selection on the geographic range of our study.