Bryozoa of Floridan Oculina reefs Author Judith L Winston text Zootaxa 2016 4071 1 1 81 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.4071.1.1 8ffe5a88-06f7-44af-95aa-5fd49e0302c4 1175-5326 260490 D47C792F-E91D-40A6-ABB7-FA7810578562 Domopora floridana Canu & Bassler, 1928 a ( Fig. 42 ; Table 41 ) Domopora floridana Canu & Bassler, 1928a: 164 , pl. 30, figs 5, 6. FIGURE 41. Microeciella floridana (Canu & Bassler, 1928) : A, small colony, showing gonozooid in upper left; B, another colony; C, close up of gonozooid and ooeciostome; D, zooids, showing distal tubular portions; E, growing margin of colony; F, close up of depressed pseudopores at margin between gonozooid and zooids. Scale bars: A, B, 1 mm; C, D, 0.5 mm; E, 0.2 mm; F, 0.1 mm. FIGURE 42. ? Domopora floridana Canu & Bassler, 1928 : A, much-abraded colony in side view; B; upper surface of colony; C, sides of colony, showing two sizes of openings; D, close-up of zooidal interior showing pinhead spinules with stellate heads. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.3 mm; D, 0.03 mm. TABLE 41. Measurements in mm of Domopora floridana Canu & Bassler, 1928 a.
Wz Col D Lz or c Wz or c
N 6 6 6 6
Mean 0.095 0.063 0.086 0.068
SD 0.011 0.015 0.014 0.008
Min 0.081 0.036 0.072 0.054
Max 0.108 0.072 0.108 0.072
Material examined. VMNH no. 70665. Description. Colony encrusting, forming circular mound, with flat to slightly sunken upper surface, with generally higher sides ( Fig. 42 A). Upper surface with polygonal cancellae ( Fig. 42 B); sides have zooid tubes interspersed with additional cancellae ( Fig. 42 C). Interior walls of zooids and cancellae with minute spinules in form of stalks with stellate heads ( Fig. 42 D). Remarks. Canu & Bassler (1928a) described this species from 30 fms in the Gulf of Mexico . They claimed to have found another Recent species in the Philippines and believed the genus to belong to a group that was abundant in the Cretaceous and Tertiary. Osburn (1940) included Domopora floridana in Lichenopora , but while it probably does not belong to the fossil genus, it does not really seem to be a lichenoporid either. Superficially the species resembles an encrusting foraminiferan, such as Homotrema , but the size of the zooid tubes and their internal ultrastructure with calcareous spinules are characteristically bryozoan. Maturo (1968) reported Lichenopora floridana [sic] from southeastern continental shelf collections in a checklist. The specimens in the Oculina study were old and abraded and could be taken for senescent colonies of Disporella or Patinella , but no other lichenoporid colonies in any condition were found in the study. It seems to be a real entity, but further classification must await better specimens. Distribution . Florida and Gulf of Mexico continental shelf.